masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
December 29, 2007

Preparing For Dayton

Filed under: Basketball,Conference,Media,Opponent(s) — Dennis @ 3:07 pm

There are currently eight undefeated teams left: North Carolina, Miami (FL), Kansas, Memphis, Washington State, Vanderbilt, Mississippi, and our Pitt Panthers. Looking to keep the streak alive tonight in Dayton. Both teams have been off since before Christmas — Dayton beat Loyola (MD) a week ago while Pitt last played two Thursdays ago and beat Duke.

It’s been mentioned that there will be plenty of support for the Flyers tonight, and they haven’t hosted such a big name opponent in a long time. The fans and players and everyone else wants to knock us off — the target on our backs comes with the territory I guess. They are 10-1 with their only loss coming very early in the season against George Mason. Since then they’ve rolled off nine straight including a win over then-#11 Louisville. In that game, Brian Roberts had 28 points and carried the team — watch out for him tonight.

The big theme from the national media has been putting Pitt on “upset alert”.

ESPN:

Pitt and Dayton are both terrific defensive teams, holding opponents to fewer than 60 points per game. The Flyers could pull off the upset if the defense holds and if last season’s A-10 Sixth Man of the Year, forward Charles Little, steps up his game.

Rivals/Yahoo:

Why you should watch: The Flyers have played surprisingly well and look as if they’ll be a contender in the Atlantic 10. A victory over Pitt, though, and Dayton becomes a team that could stay in the top 25 all season.
The buzz: Pitt has used its usual modus operandi – tough defense and dominating play in the paint – to get off to a fast start. Big men DeJuan Blair and Sam Young are an effective duo, and point guard Levance Fields has been excellent. Dayton also is playing good defense, but the Panthers will be the best team the Flyers have seen this season. Freshman F Chris Wright must hold his own in the low block and also stay out of foul trouble for Dayton to have a chance.
Spotlight player: Dayton senior guard Brian Roberts is underrated nationally and is playing at an extremely high level this season. He’s the Flyers’ only real long-range threat. Pitt’s perimeter defense has been outstanding.

Fox Sports:

The Panthers are coming off a huge win against Duke, but this atmosphere will be even tougher. The Flyers are one of the nation’s hottest programs.

(h/t: Raise the Jolly Roger for the links)

Just writing this post has made me a bit more nervous that I was 20 minutes ago. It will certainly be a tough game, but this isn’t the kind of team to get a big head and walk into UD expecting to easily win. Just keep Roberts in check and I think we’re in good shape. Tipoff is at 8:00 on ESPN2. Go Pitt.

December 21, 2007

Vote: Jerome

Filed under: Alumni,Basketball,Good,Internet,Media — Chas @ 7:02 am

ESPN is doing some sort of top highlights of all time.

Jerome Lane’s backboard breaking dunk is on the list. Since they list by date — Jan 25, 1988 — it is somewhere in the middle of the list.

Vote early and often.

December 2, 2007

Movie Time: The Celebration

Filed under: Football,Internet,Media,Players — Dennis @ 5:08 pm

I’m still pumped after the win, which I expect will carry through at least the next few days. The game ended over 18 hours ago but I still feel great. Probably the two best YouTube videos you will ever see as a Pitt fan:

On-field and Locker Room Celebrations

Doing The Soulja Boy

You know…the “Soulja Boy“.

I’ve already watched those five times apiece — makes me feel great.

Screenshot Happiness

Filed under: Football,Internet,Media — Dennis @ 1:27 pm

You want screenshots? You can’t handle the screenshots!

Enjoy…

More fun after the jump.

(more…)

November 29, 2007

As BigEast.org comes up on my screen, I see the Pitt and West Virginia logos near the top. You would think it might say “Listen Live For Free To The Backyard Brawl”.

Nope…

No doubt the higher-ups of the Big East offices want to see West Virginia advance to the BCS title game. Will the refs give the Mountaineers a few calls? Conspiracy theory? Or am I just looking for an excuse after White/Slaton put up 600 yards and 50 points on us?

November 1, 2007

I’ve tried to not get into this too much, but I think something needs to be said. By now, I’m sure a lot of you have seen the video from Saturday’s PSU-OSU game in Happy Valley. At a tailgate party, Penn Staters throw beer cans and shout obscenities at Buckeye fans. The video made it’s way to Youtube but has now been taken down, probably by the kid who put it up in order to attempt to stay clear of any charges. It’s too late.

First thought: This is a perfect example to throw back at Penn State’s face. Look at their fans, acting classless and stupid, throwing things at opposing fans.

Second thought: Take a step back and look at it a little bit more. There’s no way this represents their entire fan base. Sure they might all be elitists, but they can’t all be the jerks the video showed them to be. When I want to see something involving Penn State, I always turn to Black Shoe Diaries. In Mike’s post with the original video:

This is Penn State, bitch.

No, son, that is not Penn State.

To the Ohio State fans featured in the video, I’m sorry. On behalf of the 99% of Penn State fans that are nice people capable of showing respect to opposing fans, I’m sorry. This is not the Penn State I know and love.

See, they’re not all bad people.

One point that many people noticed, though, was that the cameraman (who, if you saw the video, was worthy of a sucker punch to the jaw) mentioned his beer-slinging friend was from Pittsburgh. It didn’t necessarily mean he was a Pitt student though.

Today (via Mondesi’s House), I saw a link to an update on the story: the kid you see below is, in fact, a Pitt student.

Oh no! A Pitt student did this! Now there’s someone to blame! Whoa, hold on…

A Pitt fan did this? No, not a Pitt fan, but a Pitt student. If he is a Pitt fan, there’s no way in hell he’s up in Happy Valley helping Penn Staters to throw beer at innocent OSU fans. Also, this does not let the other 100 PSU fans involved get off the hook. A lot of them threw beer (but most completely missed) and all should be charged. Hopefully when this is all over, that Pitt student is no longer a student at our school.

October 29, 2007

I’m sure most of you have read the comments from Pat Bostick and LeSean McCoy. Each essentially trying to take the blame for the fumble at the 1 yard-line at the end of the game.

To their credit, Bostick, who was 10 of 20 passing for 136 yards, and McCoy, who rushed 26 times for 125 yards and a touchdown, took responsibility for the fumbled exchange. Both were fighting back tears when they discussed that sequence.

“I didn’t get the ball to him, bottom line,” Bostick said. “We don’t have much to show for [the effort] because we didn’t make the play.”

McCoy then responded, “No, it wasn’t all on Pat. I didn’t secure the ball well enough. I was trying to read the defense, but you have to secure the ball first. Things like that happen.”

Wannstedt was quick to defend his talented freshmen and pointed out that the Panthers would not have been in position to possibly tie the score had Bostick and McCoy not performed so well.

“These kids played as hard as they can play and there were a lot of plays in the game that could have made a difference and this is not about one play,” Wannstedt said.

And this one.

“I didn’t get it to him, bottom line” Bostick said, sniffling.

“It wasn’t on Pat,” McCoy quietly interrupted. “I didn’t secure the ball well enough. I got lackadaisical with the ball, trying to read stuff. I need to secure the ball first.”

Good stuff. Both players clearly distraught over the loss. Taking it hard and trying to shoulder all the responsibility. Just, um, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Before he entered the interview room, Pittsburgh coach Dave Wannstedt could be overheard talking to quarterback Pat Bostick and running back LeSean McCoy.

He instructed the two freshmen to share responsibility for the goal-line fumble on a handoff near the end of the game, then he deflected blame from both.

“There were a lot of plays in the game that could have made a difference, and this is not about one play,” he said. “If these two guys continue to play like they did today, the University of Pittsburgh is going to win a ton of games, and these guys are going to have great careers.”

Well, clearly Bostick and McCoy are coachable in all facets.

Would Love To Know Who

Filed under: Football,Media — Chas @ 12:27 am

Interesting little tidbit from a Cinci student paper.

While watching the University of Cincinnati Bearcats football team take on the Pittsburgh Panthers last week at Heinz Field, I could not help but notice an annoying reporter from the Pittsburgh media. Throughout the game he was complaining about Pitt head coach Dave Wannstedt. Even when the game looked well in Pitt’s hands he still believed Pitt would blow the game.

“Wannstedt is going to [mess] this up,” he said.

For all we know, this was some kid from the Pitt News getting worked up over his team. Not the paid media. Still, that should fuel the Monday Morning Speculation.

Enjoy.

October 26, 2007

Solid podcasting from CFB Weekly takes a step backward this week. They talk to me about Dave Wannstedt, Pitt and dodging the Morelli bullet. Take a listen and fully grasp why I should be read and not heard.

Also on there, the always entertaining Troy Nunes is an Absolute Magician. Really, it almost  took a coach on the hot seat episode as UCLA and Ole Miss bloggers were also in the mix this week.

October 24, 2007

It’s under way.

I’ll get back to this later. Just wanted to give the links.

The preseason coaches poll has Pitt picked to finish 4th.

2007-08 Preseason Coaches’ Poll

 

1. Georgetown (8)                            217

Louisville (8)                           217

3. Marquette                                    191

4. Pittsburgh                                    170

5. Syracuse                                     153

6. Connecticut                                  149

7. Villanova                                      143

8. Providence                                   141

9. Notre Dame                                 122

10. West Virginia                              112

11. DePaul                                       79

12. Cincinnati                                    62

13. Seton Hall                                   56

14. St. John’s                                   52

15. Rutgers                                      32

16. USF  23

 

First-place votes in parentheses

This despite not having a single player selected for the 11-player (huh?) pre-season All-Big East team. Levance Fields only merited honorable mention

October 22, 2007

The kickoff time for Pitt and Syracuse’s November 3 game at Heinz Field has been set for noon. Similar to Saturday’s game against Cincinnati, it will be televised on ESPN Regional as the “Big East Game of the Week”. It can also be seen locally on WTAE.

Also, kicker Conor Lee was recognized as the Big East Special Teams Player of the Week (to be known as the BESTPOTW from now on). Lee accounted for 10 points against Cincinnati which ties his career high. He was perfect on three field goals (41, 25 and 37 yards) and one extra point. Lee, who is a candidate for the Lou Groza Award, extended his school-record PAT streak to 66.

October 21, 2007

Some of the Leftovers

Filed under: Fishwrap,Football,Internet,Media — Chas @ 5:04 am

I have a bunch of links that I meant to post before the Cinci-Pitt game. Just going to clear them out now.

How about an article on how Cinci wanted to cut down on the number of penalties they commit? Whoops.

Puff pieces on LeSean McCoy and Jeff Otah.

Pitt didn’t sell all of their allotment of WVU tickets for the 100th Backyard Brawl.

Paul Zeise has done a good job with his daily Q&As. Actually enjoy them more than the chats, where he seems more guarded and defensive since he has to respond immediately.

Panther_Rants: If, as some people have insinuated, there are coaching changes at the end of the season, who do you expect will go? Rhoades? Cavanaugh? Dunn?

Paul Zeise: No offense, but I’d rather not get into that. I think we all know where the deficiencies are on this team and there is no need to rehash it every Thursday.

ilivedinmemphis: Why are you always so negative?

Paul Zeise: Negative? If you listen to the fans of your rivals I am a homer! And explain to me how you write about a team that has lost nine of ten games versus I-A opponents, who consistently has gotten beaten around by any team with a pulse, who gets blown out at home by Connecticut and then loses at home – and looks completely overmatched in doing so — to Navy — and be flowery and positive all the time?

ilivedinmemphis: Can’t you say something positive?

Paul Zeise: Conor Lee kicks the ball real good.

ilivedinmemphis: Why do you never quote recruiting analysts or national broadcasters in your stories?

Paul Zeise: Because recruiting “experts” are usually self appointed and what, other than perhaps recommendations on where to get good hair spray, do national broadcasters have to say that I couldn’t get out of some former coaches or players in the area who might actually have a clue as to the subject matter with which I am writing about? I think the practice of quoting people just to quote them is bad journalism.

Like I said, I generally enjoy the Q&As more. There are more things that slip in there.

Q: I know Pitt has a lot of young players, but are the Panthers just falling apart? Do you think the coaching staff should just write off the season and play as many freshmen and sophomores to get the team ready for next season?

ZEISE: I’d say by the looks of it that yes, the Panthers are falling apart. They have lost four in a row and with consecutive games against Cincinnati and Louisville coming up, it’s probable that the losing streak will grow to six. But this is college football and a lot can happen in a short period of time and teams are quickly able to change the direction of their season, for the good or the bad. If Pitt could beat Cincinnati this week, perhaps they gain some confidence and it grows and they finish strong (strong being 3-3 with three close losses over the next six). It doesn’t look likely, but it could happen. Which brings me to the second point, Pitt needs to put the best 22 players on the field regardless of their class, their age or their experience. The 22 guys who best give the team a chance to win a football game THIS YEAR because that’s really what the focus should be.

[Emphasis added.]

That actually seemed to happen in the Cinci game. Pitt played the best players, not the most experienced.

This one had the issue of a teeth-grinding cliche.

Q: Dave Wannstedt stated that he has a young team that is a “year away” from really competing. Do you really think a team that is a “year away” would be struggling this much? The last time I checked teams that were a “year away” could win seven games and get to a bowl. See Cincinnati (2006) and Rutgers (2005).

ZEISE: Of all the things coaches say, the one that usually makes me cringe the most is “we are a young team”. That is usually code for “we aren’t winning and we want you to give us more time to figure it out.” Teams with young players have found ways to win games in the past, so the excuse is used too often as a reason things aren’t going well. While I understand if you are young in certain areas – like the line on both sides of the ball – it is indeed tough to overcome, but there is never any excuse to lose on your home field to Navy, or get blown out by the likes of Connecticut or Virginia…

He then backtracks a bit in the case of Pitt because of injuries.

Of course, then Zeise could be accused of a little bit of bias in this response.

Q: At some point in the not so distant future, the Big East is going to have to make a change and add a team. Either that or some essential Big East team will escape to the Big Ten. Besides the unlikely possibility of adding Notre Dame to the football line-up, what are some other likely cases? What might be the best situation for Pitt football? I suppose this is something the new athletic director might have to think about during his tenure.
Zeise: The Big East had a built-in answer to its scheduling problems — Temple — and chose to throw it away because of some pettiness. Had they kept Temple — and really should have once it was clear it was going to have to lose itself — it would have a ninth football team, in a large market that makes sense geographically and every team could have four home and four away games every year and there’d be no talk of adding teams. And the beauty of it was Temple is already in a conference for its other sports, so you wouldn’t have had to go to 17 teams in basketball. As it is, finding another team willing to accept football membership only will be next to impossible so the Big East will continue to be a league that is rumored to be in transition because of the scheduling problems its current make-up presents.

Zeise got his Masters at Temple. He is ignoring a lot of reality here. The long-term is that the Big East will split. When has become a little more nebulous but it will still happen. The last thing the football conference wanted was having to deal with Temple. The program is a drag on finances (sharing bowl money) and academic standings (they are struggling badly to make the APR). There is the lack of fan support. The administration has never made any effort to really bring them up to modern standards or put money into them. Major media market or not, they aren’t a factor in football there.

Anyone remember when plenty of programs dreamed of luring Wannstedt back to college?

Coach on the outbound train: Pittsburgh’s Dave Wannstedt. He’s gone from NFL coach to being offered $20 million in 2001 to coach the Hurricanes, to getting fired by the Dolphins and going home to Pitt. Now, his team (2-4) has lost four straight, including 34-14 to Connecticut and 44-14 to Virginia. Cincinnati, Rutgers, South Florida and West Virginia are left on the schedule. When Wannstedt got the Pitt job, an NFL coach said he’d turn it into Rutgers, pre-2005.

I thought the rumored quote used Temple, not Rutgers.

October 14, 2007

Greatest. Analogy. Ever.

Filed under: Football,Media — Dennis @ 4:02 pm

From Paul Zeise’s Q&A on page C-2 in today’s Post-Gazette

Q: I actually don’t mind Dave Wannstedt going for the win [vs. Navy]…but a fade to the tight end? Why not to a wide receiver or just run LeSean McCoy?

A: It was refreshing that Dave Wannstedt went against his nature — he even admitted he wasn’t comfortable going for it on fourth down — and went for the win. But you are right, the last two play calls were, well, like a closer giving up a game winning home run because he threw his fourth-best pitch instead of bringing the heat.

The more I think about those last two play calls, the more my anger level rises.

October 11, 2007

Navy-Pitt: Media Links

Filed under: Fishwrap,Football,Media,Opponent(s) — Chas @ 10:57 am

Too tired, too limited in time, too pissed and too frustrated to do much right now.

Here are the links for the day.

A couple stories in notebooks on honoring Dorsett, Martin and Starbauch from the Trib. and P-G.

Zeise at the P-G’s story (boy, you think his chat today will be fun or what?).

The Panthers’ defense began the second half reeling again but the Midshipmen made their first mistake of the game on the opening drive of the second half and it turned out to be a crucial one. Navy appeared to have converted a first down on a 2nd-and-6 run but was penalized for holding, pushing the ball back ten yards and putting the Midshipmen in 2nd-and-15.

That was a big break for Pitt because, the triple-option offense is not designed to convert long down-and-distances and sure enough, the Panthers held and forced the Midshipmen to punt for the first time.

Pitt then took its first lead of the game –and its first lead since the second game of the season in a win over Grambling –when McCoy capped a seven-play, 54-yard drive with a 2-yard touchdown run.

Since Grambling? I really didn’t need to know that.

Kevin Gorman at the Trib. Reads like a straight recap of the scoring which isn’t too shocking considering when this game ended and the story needed to be filed.

The good in the game was QB Pat Bostick and the offense getting a boost of confidence. The great, LeSean McCoy.

On a night when Tony Dorsett was an honorary captain for the Pitt football team, the Panthers’ latest fantastic freshman tailback, LeSean McCoy, stirred memories of the former Heisman Trophy winner.

McCoy ran for 32 times for 165 yards and three scores, but it wasn’t enough as Navy pulled out a stunning 48-45 double-overtime win Wednesday night at Heinz Field.

McCoy has nine rushing touchdowns this season, which is three shy of Dorsett’s freshman mark set in 1973.

The disaster, of course, the defense.

Pitt had 10 days to prepare for Navy, 10 days to decipher an offense that’s so darned unpredictable that it runs the ball 84 percent of the time, 10 days to ponder the implications of two Navy slotbacks whose combined weight does not equal that of starting Pitt tackle Jeff Otah.

Swear to God.

So it took only two hours after the opening kickoff last night for the Panthers’ “defense” to accomplish what could definitely be called a stop of the Midshipmen, aided though it was by an offensive holding penalty. For the record, it was Joe Clermond, the senior defensive end, who sacked Navy quarterback Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada, the Hurryin’ Hawaiian, on a third-and-10 from the Navy 27 on the first series of the second half.

10 days was the theme of the column.

Had it ended there, it would merely have been a disgraceful performance by Pitt’s defenders and, more pointedly, its defensive coaching staff. As it was, Navy put up another 17 points in a 48-45 double-overtime victory that was, from Pitt head coach Dave Wannstedt’s tortured perspective, well, indefensible.

“I was very confident,” Wannstedt said of Paul Rhoads’ defensive game plan. “We spent more than 10 actually, although it probably didn’t look like it. We spent time in the summer, talking to different people about [Navy’s] offense.”

The Middies’ crisp execution of the allegedly antiquated triple option makes for a nice nostalgic theme for press box antiquarians who might believe the game has long since become hopelessly over-coached, but this isn’t necessarily what the Panthers bargained for on a night soaked with nostalgia.

At least one columnist made mention of the DC being responsible for the defenses’ game plan. Collier’s column puts the blame on the defense as he notes so much attention will go to the OT playcalling on offense. The defense’s performance was indefensible.

It has to be pointed out, for example, that when Wannstedt and his staff have more than a week to prepare for an opponent, Pitt’s record is 2-8. In the same situation, by damning contrast, Navy coach Paul Johnson is 17-7 given the same advantage.

“We went for it on fourth down a lot more than I was comfortable with out there,” Wannstedt said, effectively illustrating the desperation Pitt brought to the field last night. “That was not normal football.”

No, not at all.

Normally, football teams with the size, speed and recruiting advantages Pitt holds over the Naval Academy cannot be outfoxed by an offense that hasn’t been operating at the elite levels of the sport in 20 years. They can sometimes be fooled by a play or an inspired series, but not for 45 minute and 32 seconds, which was Navy’s time of possession last night. The Panthers spent so much time chasing Kaheaku-Enhada, trying to pull down Navy’s bullish fullbacks, trying to spot its whippet slotbacks, that when slot back Reggi Campbell swept out of the backfield on a pass pattern toward the left flank of Pitt’s defense, veteran safety Mike Phillips just let go.

“Guy just ran right by him,” Wannstedt said. “He thought he was gonna block him.”

Starkey, by contrast did mention the defense sucking. Funny thing, however, no mention of the DC by name or direct blame.

The Midshipmen spent the rest of the first half torturing Pitt with its triple-option. Pitt’s defensive linemen wore shin guards in practice to prepare for Navy’s cut-blocking. Maybe they should have worn chest protectors, because Navy’s fullbacks spent the better part of the evening stomping over them for big gains.

Didn’t that fullback dive play show up on film study?

Navy quarterback Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada (spell check just exploded) also had more yards passing in the first half (96) than he’d had totaled in three of his first five games.

Not that any of this was particularly surprising. The Panthers haven’t stopped an option attack of any kind in years.

I eagerly await the next defense of Paul Rhoads needing more time.

Baltimore Sun sportswriter blogs a bit about the game (and thanks for the link).

In the first OT, Pitt hammered out a touchdown and Navy answered with a single strike 25-yard pass from QB Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada to Reggie Campbell. In the second OT, the Middies went on offense first and settled for a 29-yard field goal by Joey Bullen. Then, Pitt comes storming back. The Panthers had second-and-goal from the 3-yard line. Second down: running play for one yard. Third down: incomplete pass (illegal motion penalty declined). And with the game on the line, Wannstedt goes for the win on fourth down and the Panthers go incomplete on a jump ball in the right side of the end zone. In western Pennsylvania, they want to back up the truck and load up the whole coaching staff.

Yep. Pretty much.

Attendance was officially listed at a bit over 30,000. Looked like less on TV.

October 7, 2007

The Other Pitt Basketball Team

Filed under: Basketball,Media,TV — Dennis @ 3:01 pm

Enjoy today. It’s one of the few Sundays this fall where you won’t be replaying every single Pitt mistake in your head after an ugly loss. Instead, we’ll save that for Thursday this week. How about some women’s hoops? Last year’s landmark season, which included our first-ever trip to the NCAA Tournament, put the women’s program on the map.

This year could be even bigger. All five starters are back plus the addition of All-Big East point guard Mallorie Winn who missed all of last year. Now we’ll be on TV a number of times this season.

“Playing on television seven times this year is a tremendous reward and opportunity for our program,” Berenato said. “It is very gratifying that networks like ESPN and CSTV have recognized the excitement surrounding Pitt women’s basketball and want to showcase our program to a larger audience. I know our players and fans are really looking forward to the season and this announcement is one more reason to be excited about what we are building at Pitt.”

Pitt’s ESPNU telecasts include its road game at DePaul (Jan. 6) and home contests against Louisville (Jan. 27) and Connecticut (Feb. 17). The Panthers’ Feb. 10 game at Notre Dame will be an ESPN2 telecast.

Other TV games are on the Big Ten Network and CSTV.

Expect a preseason poll ranking for the team.

The Pitt women’s basketball team continues to break new ground as it has received numerous preseason rankings, including a No. 18 ranking from Lindy’s Sports Annuals and a No. 21 ranking from both Athlon Sports Annuals and WomensBasketballMagazine.com.

A full team preview can be found here.

I definitely think I’ll come to at least a few women’s games this year — come support the program, too.

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter