Before I do the media rundown of Pitt’s 23 point win over UNC-Ashville, I’ll take a moment to explain why I wasn’t too worried about Pitt’s start yesterday.
First, Pitt had been off for over a week. You have to expect some rust — and sure enough it was there. Second, you just cannot keep trying to read too much into every moment of a game. It becomes easy in hindsight after a team loses. Oh, there were the signs. It becomes the cliche — weak spot X finally caught up to team Y. But in a one-and-done format it comes down to the teams, their skill and talent, match-ups and luck.
Look at Louisville. Coming into the Tournament, they were the runner-up in the Big East Tournament. They had won seven of their last nine. Beaten teams like Pitt, UConn and Notre Dame. They looked like the second hottest team in the Big East. They came out and laid an egg against Morehead St. Maybe they would have come back to win if Knowles hadn’t gotten hurt in the second half, but would you, did you in your bracket expect that?
Remember Pitt last year? Absolutely dismantled Oakland in the opening game and then lost to Xavier. Or how about a few years back, when Pitt won the Big East Tournament? They throttled some poor team and then played horribly against Michigan State to bow out early. The year Pitt went a Scottie effin’ Reynolds lay-up short of the Final Four, Pitt putzed around for most of the game against ETSU.
(more…)