masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
March 2, 2010

Okay, spare stuff.

I’ve said it before, seeding will take care of itself. That doesn’t stop the conversation, and wondering whether Pitt’s personnel issues will be considered to swing it upward.

Maybe the one factor that’s missing is an unknown to most: how the selection committee will take the absence of Jermaine Dixon and Gilbert Brown into consideration.

Dixon missed the season’s first eight games rehabbing a knee injury and sat out the Panthers’ loss at South Florida with an ankle injury. Brown missed the first 11 games under academic suspension.

With Dixon, the Panthers’ shutdown defender, in the lineup, Pitt is 15-5 (.750) against a schedule that included 15 games against the RPI top 100. Against the RPI top 50, the Panthers are 6-2 with Dixon, a number better than Pitt’s overall mark vs. the top 50 (7-3). The numbers are similar against the top 100.

It’s a nice point, but I’m guessing it won’t get much weight considering the whole team improved into the season. Pitt’s run in the Big East will give it plenty of weight — assuming they take care of the next couple of games.

Lots of Coach Dixon love as the Horizon League player in the year, Gordon Hayward, is still giving love to his U-19 coach.

Hayward is fourth in the league in scoring (15.8) and third in rebounding (8.5). He credited Butler strength coach Jim Peal and USA coach Jamie Dixon of Pittsburgh for improving and expanding his game.

Dixon was “on me from day one” to rebound, Hayward said. “He was exactly right. Sometimes I would just sit on the perimeter and get ready to go back on defense.”

Then there is this interview with Coach Dixon.

SNY.tv: What sold Jermaine, and so many other young athletes, on Pittsburgh?

JD:: When we talk to a player and player’s family, we make them a promise: you’re going to improve as a player, as a student, and as an individual. That’s what a coach’s job is. That’s what we put our efforts and our energy into. It’s about helping young people improve. When their time as a student is finished, I want them to be a better player, but ultimately, I want them to have their degree and to have become a better human being.

Speaking of interviews. Here’s his interview from yesterday with Jim Rome.

Lot of good stuff including wanting to be at a place where the fans aren’t satisfied (boy, is he at the right place). Plus he stated (at least for public consumption) that he felt the ND game was just one of those games where ND wasn’t going to lose to anyone. I can somewhat agree. The fact that it was a blowout loss, though, was on Pitt playing a step slow.

For the record, nothing undermines complaints about not playing zone when the example is against a ND team drilling 3s.

Speaking of defense, Providence does not seem to be playing any. Their coach is frustrated.

Up at PC, it is Spring Break, so the Friars’ campus is quiet. The one exception is inside Mullaney Gym, where Davis is still stinging from the 99-93 loss to South Florida. In the heated moments after that game, Davis could be heard from behind closed doors laying into his team. After pleading with his players all season for defensive basics such as closing out on shooters, getting back after made baskets, and halting penetration, the coach now seems to be swallowing hard, shrugging his shoulders and thinking a better defense won’t appear until next November.

“We need our returning guys to improve defensively or they won’t play as much or at all,” Davis said Monday in the toughest remarks he’s made all season about a defense that is allowing 81.2 points, the third-worst total in the nation. “Some of our players have offense as their strength and their weakness is on defense. That’s going to change or they won’t be playing.”

Davis insists he knows how to teach defense. He considers it a priority, although this team seems to regard it as an afterthought. He’d like to hold his weakest defenders more accountable for their misdeeds, but says a lack of depth has prevented him from making those moves.

“There’s a point where guys make mistakes, and as a coach you can sit them, but are you ruining your chances of winning a game?” Davis said. “I’m always about winning each game. Accountability comes down to flexibility. With our top six or seven (players), you have to fight through their faults.”

It will be interesting to see if they respond to having a national game and absolutely being embarrassed. Last night, during the Georgetown-WVU game Jay Bilas called Providence the “Worst defensive team I’ve ever seen in the Big East.” Yow.





I hope we don’t end up playing Butler in the tournament and regret all that JD did for Hayward!

Comment by TMGPanther 03.02.10 @ 1:04 pm

I second that .. our record against teams from Indiana this year is horrendous

Comment by wbb 03.02.10 @ 2:33 pm

Pitt is in the rumor-mill for the Big Ten again….link to sports.espn.go.com

Comment by Pendlum 03.02.10 @ 3:26 pm

Zone defense does not stop the 3 point shot. A matchup or man will. When a team like ND is hitting their shots, all you can do is use your TO’s and pray. Pitt has certainly run into 3 point buzz saws over the Dixon era.

Comment by Dan 72 03.02.10 @ 4:27 pm

Ya, we’re in the rumor mill, #3 on the list of the Big Tens firm that looked into it. Behind #1 Rutgers and #2 Missouri. Pitt would be such a sweet fit, I guess NYC tv market too much to pass on. Oh boy, get ready for Central Florida, Memphis and geez, maybe we’ll get Temple back. Difficult situation for all, but, my nightmare is looking more and more real. Pitt would fit in there perfectly, and let’s be honest, our hated rival is PSU. Sure, WVU gets you mad, but in our hearts, blood boiling, we know it’s PSU. All specualtion of course, but, I don’t like more and more I’m hearing. Oh, wow, maybe E.Carolina fffffffffffffffffff

Comment by Dan 03.02.10 @ 4:28 pm

Three things to take from that ESPN article on the Big Ten expansion:

1. Pitt is mentioned as part of a study of whether taking 5 teams would be profitable for the Big Ten (the conclusion was that it would be). This doesn’t mean Pitt is a top choice, but rather, that they may be among the top choices if the Big Ten goes to 16 teams.

2. Barry Alvarez appeared to be quoted that the conference would charge an entrance fee to any Big East team of $5 million (he called it a “loyalty fee”). Personally, I find it offensive that a university would have to pay that kind of money to join an enterprise that is being driven by an attempt to make even more money.

3. If only one Big East team were to leave, and that team were Rutgers (based on the current rumors du jour), I’d be very happy with Pitt staying in the Big East. If more teams leave the Big East, Pitt needs to be one of them or be caught on the outside looking in.

Comment by Pantherman13 03.02.10 @ 5:01 pm

I would miss the Big East Tourney at MSG… been going for almost 10 years now.

Comment by Snala the Panther 03.02.10 @ 5:27 pm

I was under the impression that the $5mil was what the team has to pay the Big East to leave. Would this be additional?

Also, I am not sure if I’d like Pitt to go or not. Yes good for football, but hoops, I am afraid Dixon would leave.

However, I think Rutgers is not going to be a good add. The school will never be competitive enough to get many TV sets tuned in if they enter the Big Ten. People there just don’t care about RU. They tuned in the one good year because it was a surprise, a good story. They have been on a good little streak but I feel they have peaked.

Comment by OntarioLett'sGoPitt 03.02.10 @ 6:40 pm

OLett – you may be correct about the $5 million fee. The ESPN article is very poorly written, so it is hard to tell to what the $5 million refers. It does appear right after the following quote from Alvarez:

“You just don’t jump into the league and get a full share of what everyone else in this league has established over time. I think someone has to buy their way into the league.”

That made me think the $5 million was an “entrance fee” but it may be that ESPN was referring to two separate expenditures without really distinguishing them.

Comment by Pantherman13 03.02.10 @ 8:46 pm

A “matchup” is a type of zone defense, i.e. matchup zone.

See
link to coachesclipboard.net

Comment by shadyforpresident 03.03.10 @ 8:50 am

Follow the money. Big Ten expansion has always been and will always be about the money. For that reason, I think they will go to 16 teams. If not right away, then in the very near future. When they go 16, Pitt HAS TO be one of them. Big East football will not be relevant in a 16 team Big Ten world.

Comment by Boubacar Aw 03.03.10 @ 10:01 am

As the Big 1x commish said on Cowherd last week, it’s very premature to discuss expansion and who will be invited in. They are just fact-finding right now and the study was part of that. The conclusion that the Big 1x should expand based on the study is simply one reporter’s opinion of the findings.

Comment by TampaT 03.03.10 @ 10:48 am

Tampa, I agree, it is all specualtion, but, it is major issue for Pitt and those who bleed blue and gold. Ya, I’m gonna enjoy the BE and NCAA tourney, and get ready for spring ball, but, in the back of my mind, and many Pitt buddies, being faced with a BE in a few years that consists of E.Carolina, Memphis, Toledo and maybe Temple again, is a nightmare!! Is it as important as whether Iran is going to use nukes, no, but, in the Pitt sports world, it is the biggest direction marker for Pitt in years, hence, all the talk. Said this once before, we all bleed blue and gold on here, I personally am just fearful we are going to end up in irrelavant conference and not be part of the “scene”. I hope I’m wrong, Hail to Pitt!! Go Hoops!!!

Comment by Dan 03.03.10 @ 1:17 pm

Dan, I hear ya. I bleed blue and gold as much as anyone. Heck, my TV room is blue and gold, and decorated with Pitt and Steelers stuff. I’m also a long time Panther Club member even though I live too far away to enjoy most of the benefits.

My point is that it is too early to get worked up over, because the Big 1x is still clueless on what they’re going to do. And, the Big East for the most part, is sitting on their thumbs waiting for the Big 1x to make a move.

I have my opinions too, but I’d rather talk about playing in the best basketball conference in history. That’s the one we’re in right now, and that’s the season we’re in right now. Let’s worry about the Big 1x expansion when it actually is a known factor, or in that lull between Spring ball and the start of camp. That’s all I’m sayin’.

Comment by TampaT 03.03.10 @ 2:18 pm

Combing two of the above topics, seeding and Indiana, I have a thought. If the selection committee lowers Purdue’s seeding (assuming they would) as a result of the loss of Robbie Hummel, why wouldn’t they increase Pitt’s seeding with the gain of Dixon and Brown? Sure, Indiana was Dixon’s first game back, but surely they’re away that the Pitt team that lost to Indiana is the same team that BEAT Syracuse at away, beat UConn away, beat Villanova, and beat WVU in three OT’s. I find it hard to believe they could punish Pitt’s early season struggles.

Comment by Lou 03.03.10 @ 9:13 pm

Lou: The bracket matrix at link to bracketproject.50webs.com (follow the links from Chas’ post above) has Pitt as a solid 3 seed. Bracket gurus like Lunardi and Palm have us as a 3 as well. That makes Pitt no worse than the 12th best team in the bracket.

Since the various polls and power rankings have Pitt no better than 17th, it seems like the bracket experts expect the committee to consider the factors you mention in addition to Pitt’s RPI and SOS.

Of course, Pitt has to keep winning and have a good showing in the BE tourney, because as Chas keeps pointing out, this stuff is all very fluid right now. Lose tonight or on Saturday, and we could tumble 2 spots.

Comment by TampaT 03.04.10 @ 8:44 am

I’m with ya Tampa, heading to the Rutgers game in about fifteen min. You’re right of course, nothing going to happen till the Big 10 makes a move, I just worry, and it is interesting. Tell ya what, I’ll have a couple pre-gamers in the lot for ya, and I won’t mention expansion…….for at least a week!!! lol

Comment by Dan 03.06.10 @ 2:37 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter