masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
September 1, 2014

Final Thoughts on Grilled Blue Hens

Filed under: Football — Chas @ 9:37 am

Thanks Reed and Justin for taking care of most of the post-mortem. Two days later that just leaves the final clean-up to me.

Mid-way through the 3d quarter I was talking with another guy in the press box. We were half-joking, wondering what Pitt fans were going to be complaining about after the game — other than whether Boyd should have been returning punts. Considering the complete dominance on both sides of the ball. The fact that James Conner was already done for the day. All the running backs were seeing time. Chad Voytik wasn’t having to do too much, the only thing we could come up with was: the tight ends weren’t used enough. (This was shortly before Orndoff caught a TD pass.)

Sure enough late in the 4th quarter he showed me a tweet he got from a fan complaining/questioning why the TEs weren’t thrown to much in the game. It was so cute.  14 total passes attempted in the game with 10 completions. Very little pressure even came close to Voytik that required him to dump it off. 7 different players caught the ball.

That’s okay. There’s an impulse in us all to look for some negatives. Especially when the game went that smoothly and perfectly. We know it won’t be like the rest of the season (well, maybe FIU), so there needs to be something to fix or tweak. Heck, in Coach Paul Chryst’s post-game presser, even he eventually got around to the subject of cleaning things up.

It was a hot and steamy one. I can’t say I blame the fans who didn’t stick around to the end — or much beyond halftime. Especially those that were baking in the sun all game. A huge blowout and stifiling weather, and the crowd — which wasn’t large to start — didn’t make it to Sweet Caroline. Credit should definitely be given to the students who did pack their section to start the game. The Labor Day weekend has long been a weekend where a lot of students use the long weekend for a quick trip back home. Add in people who unnecessarily worrying about incoming traffic tie-ups for the Pirates game at 4 pm.

Reed linked to Artie Rowell’s post-game interview. If you watch it, look for the moment (about 3:42) when he finds out just how much yardage the running backs gained. The surprise and grin that flashes is one of those neat moments.

In the post-game stuff, Chryst was asked about using Tyler Boyd in punt returns. Let’s just say he was unapologetic.

“No, no,” Chryst said. “Tyler got hurt carrying the ball, and we’re going to put him in that position a lot.”

Isn’t that part of it?  Boyd is a playmaker. You want him to have a chance to make things happen. I have no problem with Boyd returning punts. When he took the shot to his hand, it was midway through the second quarter. Yes, it was already 28-0; but it was way too early in the game to start pulling players. Add in the fact that on the previous punt return Weatherspoon fumbled it. Don’t know who else they want to return punts — but Weatherspoon is not the answer.

In the post-game press conference and the player interviews, there seemed to be little concern with Boyd’s dislocated finger. A clear relief, because he was in such obvious pain when it happened. Running back across the field after the play. Holding the hand and so clearly hurt.

Almost lost in the dominance of the offense and running game, the defense completely shut down Delaware. I mean, dominated utterly and completely. And it was all up-front. In Ray Vinopal’s post game interview he stated that the secondary had it pretty easy because the D-line did most of the work. There was only two sacks by the defense, but Delaware is not much of a passing team. The Blue Hens only attempted 16 passes.

About the worst thing you can say about this game is that Pitt had such control and dominance that there is no way to judge this team. Not the worst problem to have.





Weather forecast for Boston 88 degrees and sunny, just the way we like it.

Comment by gc 09.01.14 @ 9:42 am

Regardless of an outcome, some people always see the glass of water half empty. Before the seasons end, many of the Pitt naysayers will (unfortunately) have their day. But I’m enjoying my favorite football team being undefeated and un-scored upon. 🙂 Hail To Pitt!

Comment by MariettaMike 09.01.14 @ 9:46 am

What I really like about the win is that we FINALLY pounded an opponent like we should have. For so many recent years we have played “down” to our opponents level and even lost, had to come from behind, etc. This single fact was a BIG plus for me.

HTP and POUND BC!

Comment by PITT it IS 09.01.14 @ 9:51 am

“Yes, it was already 28-0; but it was way too early in the game to start pulling players.”

By that team, all 2nd teamers except for some OL already were in the game. Rori Blair apparently played DE the very first series.

What part of the game up to that point made you think that (1) Delaware even had a remote chance of coming back and (2) it was better practice for the 1st teamers to be out there, as opposed to practicing against your own tea?

Comment by wbb 09.01.14 @ 10:15 am

wbb,

They had subbed, yes. But not pulled players. You still need to give players meaningful snaps. These aren’t NFL veterans who know exactly what they should do and are being rested for the playoffs. This was the first game of the season. The first meaningful snaps for this team in months.

Comment by Chas 09.01.14 @ 12:29 pm

Funny – I’m working on a “Monday Morning Quarterback” series of articles and will post the first one up later today.

Bitchin’ is part of the fun of following sports.

Comment by Reed 09.01.14 @ 10:59 am

Football remains a game of emotion. Spread offenses can look terrible in one half and look great in another. Look at Oklahoma State. They looked completely out of sync for awhile and they got it together and gained confidence. Heck, look at Duke last year. You just can’t let up anymore. Heck, it’s just not now either. Didn’t Buffalo come back from like 35-0 against Houston one playoff year?

The coaches know how many possessions typically occur during a game and as such, know when to call off the dogs. 28-0 in the second is not one of those times. Would we be complaining if this was the WR reverse during the first series?

I like to bitch, I mean be a contrarian, but for me, this isn’t one of those times. Carpe’ Eagles!

Comment by dhuffdaddy 09.01.14 @ 11:46 am

Bitching is a whole lot more fun after a win!

Comment by dinosaur 71 09.01.14 @ 12:07 pm

Here’s two things to complain about. Cut down on penalties, and quit fumbling the ball.

Hail to Pitt!

Comment by Digdug 09.01.14 @ 1:08 pm

Chas, I suggest you look at the punt return data from last year. Boyd didn’t return a punt in entire regular season, and then returned one (of his 3) for a TD in the bowl game.

And again, I don’t think returning a punt vs Delaware provided much valuable practice.

Comment by wbb 09.01.14 @ 2:07 pm

Wbb, coaches never think it’s over…One of the better known HS coaches in this area was George Chaump. He was a HC at Marshall and Navy in the mid 80’s to mid 90’s. After he left college coaching he returned to coach a few local HS Teams. He happened to be sitting in front of me at a Bishop McDevitt game once, and McDevitt was destroying their opponent 42-0 with 52 seconds left in the first half. McD had the ball on the opponents 45 yard line with a second and 1. They ran a fake dive play and threw a deep post pattern for a touchdown. Wating for the ensuing kickoff I said to my brother, “What the hell did coach call that play for, he does not need to run up the score because this game is already over”. Coach Chaump turned around and looked at me with a stunned look on his face and said “Son, that was a great call!”. I never forgot that comment. Every play is a competition, an opportunity to improve. I think that is why you virtually never see the starters removed from an NFL game.

Comment by HbgFrank 09.01.14 @ 2:27 pm

Nice post-mortem gentlemen! Watched the replay on ESPN3 and was thrilled by the video even more because you knew what was coming! The answer to back-up kick returning seems simple and it’s name is Jones! Follow-up to Keith’s prior comment about aggressiveness on JC’s part re: ball control, I counted 3 occasions where he did not fumble but the ball got a little loose on him. Good thing his heels kicked the ball back under him on one of his TD runs. I’m hoping the ville beats the Canes because Miami needs an early loss in our division! Hail to Pitt! UPone

Comment by UPone 09.01.14 @ 2:29 pm

Back in the late 80s,the University of Houston once scored 95 points in a ball game and the following season scored 80 in a game … on both occasions, they were upset the very next week.

In RichRod’s 1st year at WVU, they ran up something like 70 vs Rutgers only to lose thereafter to lowly Temple.

In Petrino’s 1st stint at Louisville, they scored 69 points vs Oregon St and then was beaten by underdog USF the very next week.

Running up big scores doesn’t mean sh*t!

Comment by wbb 09.01.14 @ 4:47 pm

note that my posting above was in response HBFrank’s posting … I was not implying that PC ran up the score. When you have the back-ups playing the entire 2nd half, there is not much more you can do

Comment by wbb 09.01.14 @ 4:55 pm

Isn’t it pleasant not to read a single post this weekend that contained the phrase, “the same old Pitt”?

@ wbb, you are sooo right, last week’s result often has little effect on the outcome of the next contest. Focus on one opponent at a time and the season will evolve in it’s own good time,favorably, one hopes, if they take care of their business in the here & now! Now on to Chestnut Hill and preparing for the Boston College Eagles!

Still scratching my head over the BC+1 initial betting line, however. What is it that makes BC the favorite? The only thing I see is the home team advantage. Sorry, I’m just not buying that Saturday’s a$$ whoopin was a Pitt mirage.

Let’s hope that BC is believing that line. Sneak up on the opposition while we can! I don’t know how much longer Pitt can fly under the radar if they beat BC on Friday, considering the exposure on national TV?

H2P, Pluck the Eagles!

Comment by Dr. Tom 09.01.14 @ 5:15 pm

Correction BC-1.

Comment by Dr. Tom 09.01.14 @ 5:17 pm

Dr Tom, FWIW, in 08, we lost the opener to Bowling Green and then struggled with Buffalo before pulling away towards the end. Iowa won the first 2 games handily, yet we were a slight home favorite which surprised many .. and we won!

Comment by wbb 09.01.14 @ 5:53 pm

wbb
08 is the typical Pitt pattern of playing like a pansy until coming up against a real team, getting punched in the mouth, then playing better for the rest of the year.
Last year we got punched in the mouth, and other places, in the first game and yet still played like pansies against lesser teams.
This season, I’m glad we had a warm-up game, next is a real game so we can toughen up for the rest of the season. I don’t expect us to play like pansies at all this year.
H2P

Comment by Caw Miller 09.03.14 @ 9:45 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter