Yes, I am blatantly stealing this idea from Nunes. Too good not to do an info-dump version for Pitt.
The final year for Pitt in the Big East. Next year, it’s the ACC. So, time to take a historical look at the most played teams, the past and future. The list is of the teams Pitt has played 20 or more times.
Most Played Teams in Pitt Football
1. West Virginia: 104, 61-40-3. Like it or not, you know at some point the Backyard Brawl will be played once more.
2. Penn State: 96, 42-50-4. Unless this resumes as a full-time series.
3. (tie) Notre Dame: 67, 20-46-1. Sadly, this is not the most lopsided historical record on the list.
3. (tie) Syracuse: 67, 34-30-3. You would think both sides would care more about this series, as within the next 5 years or so Pitt will be their most played opponent and Cuse remains a top-3. Yet you would be hard pressed to find a fan on either side who circles this game on the calendar.
5. Navy: 38, 22-13-3. Kind of a sharp drop-off to the 5th spot.
6. Temple: 35, 26-8-1. Useless factoid: four of the eight losses happened in the 90s. Sums up how far Pitt football dropped in that period.
7. Washington & Jefferson: 33, 18-13-1. Odds are they will remain in the top-10 for several more years.
8. Miami: 32, 9-22-1. No, even this record isn’t the worst.
9. Carnegie Tech: 30, 24-5-1. Suck it, nerds.
10. (tie) Boston College: 29, 16-13. Meh.
10. (tie) Rutgers: 29, 21-8. Over the last 20 year Pitt has been only 12-8 vs. Rutgers. Ouch.
12. Army: 27, 19-6-2. And on the flip side…
13. Ohio State: 25, 5-19-1. God, that is embarrassing.
14. Nebraska: 24, 15-6-3. Probably the oddest thing to see on this list.
As you can see, the only teams on that list that will still be in the Big East next year are Temple and Rutgers. Not exactly feeling like Pitt is leaving part of its heritage behind. Only two teams on this list that we can be absolutely sure Pitt will never again play.
Now, in the swan song of the Big East season, here’s the history against Big East foes.
Big East Remainders
Temple: 35, 26-8-1.
Rutgers: 29. 21-8.
Louisville: 15, 8-7. I hope these guys get to the Big 12, someday.
Cincinnati: 11, 8-3. Saw comments on Twitter about how Pitt needs to win the last game to reclaim the River City Rivalry Trophy — so it can be tossed in the Ohio River so as to never be seen again. I guess that beats sticking it in the closet with the CBI trophy. My hope is that Pitt wins, then politely gives it back to the Bearcats saying, “Enjoy the memories when you briefly gained relevancy.”
USF: 9, 6-3. The Big East team that annually challenged Pitt for most disappointing.
UConn: 8, 4-4. Pitt can’t really leave the Big East with a losing record to these guys. May actually be considered a must win this year.
If you are wondering about the future Big East teams: UCF, Houston, SMU, Boise St. and San Diego St. Pitt’s combined record against them is 4-4. Pitt has never played Boise St. and SDSU.
And just for fun, the Future.
ACC
Syracuse: 67, 34-30-3.
Miami: 32, 9-22-1.
Boston College: 29, 16-13.
Clemson: 1, 1-0. 1977 Gator Bowl. Pitt 34 Clemson 3.
Duke: 17, 9-8. Actually played Duke 6 straight years… in the 30s and 40s.
Florida State: 8, 5-3. Last meeting, 1983.
Georgia Tech: 7, 5-2. Last game was back in 1976.
Maryland: 6, 3-3. Can someone. Anyone. Explain how Pitt and Maryland have only played 6 times?
North Carolina: 7, 3-4. So, was anyone on those Butch Davis teams academically eligible?
North Carolina St.: 9, 5-3-1. Russell f**kin’ Wilson.
Virginia: 5, 3-2. It’s a very pretty campus.
Virginia Tech: 11, 4-7. I am really looking forward to the Hokies.
Wake Forest: Never played a game. Not sure they really exist.
Even though, Pitt was an independent for all those years, ACC teams never seemed to make it on the schedule. Weird.
Pitt-MD will likely become a very good hoops rivalry though.
Why are you trying to pretend the 90s didn’t happen? Pitt was disgustingly bad, not the Big East. Syracuse was really good. Miami was mostly Miami and even re-surged in 2000. VT emerged. Pitt lost to Temple and Rutgers in that time. Pitt then had to rebuild from that. Pitt lost to Rutgers and Temple a combined 7 times in that decade. 7 of the 16 total losses Pitt has to those two teams came in that period.
You might want to say that the reputation of the Big East wasn’t much of a help after the first ACC raid, but Pitt had a lot more to with Pitt’s problems. In fact, Pitt was one of the teams the Big East was counting on to try and restore the profile of the league. Throughout the 2000s, Pitt was expected to be resurgent. 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010. All years where Pitt could have or was expected to be the top team in the conference. All years where Pitt missed its opportunities.
Again, just as FSU failing to take care of business against teams like Wake Forest in the recent years, along with their ending of the Bowden era had a lot more to do with FSU’s problems than the ACC’s rep in recruiting.
I am glad to be leaving the Big East. I am excited for the possibilities of the ACC. I am not, however, going to blame the Big East for Pitt’s failures.
Pitt, with its academic requirements in this 60s, Oval in the 90s and even recently where the coaching staff and recruiting budget were much less than its rivals, has not always placed such a high premium on football … maybe not necessariy a bad thing considering what our friends 3 hours to the east are experiencing.
And the results from the last one have not come in yet the u just cant play bye the rules.
And golden was at penn state in the past right.
The reason the ACC has been able to recuit the BE teams was simply due to money, which in turn is due to a bigger passion of college FB in the southeast than the northeast. The hope here is that the increased passion is infectious to the dispassionate Pitt fans … whom like most of the NFL cities in the northeast, looks at college FB simply as a minor league to the NFL.
of Johnny Majors II !!!!!!!
A corollary: Hire a great coach and they will win.
FYI, Wake Forest’s campus (and stadium) is very much like UVA’s, but a lot smaller (only 4,500 students). Winston-Salem is much more developed than Charlottesville, though. It’s amazing that they can actually field a D1 football team.
It had recent FB success when it brought in UM alum Ralph Freidgan who had a couple of 10 wins season, yet dumped him after 2010 because he apparently couldn’t take him to the next level. (his replacement, R Edsall didn’t exactly win over the UM faithful this past season.)
UM does seem a naturall ACC rival mostly due to geographic, bet also because it situated near an NFL franchise that is revered by the locals … I guess the other similarity is that it dumped its coach (an alum) who couldn’t meet their expectations.
It’s time to shut down Penn State football and penalize the University as a whole!
WE ARE…Arrogant
WE ARE…in Denial
WE ARE…penn state
I lived in the Baltimore DC area for six years before escaping to Westeern Pennsylvania. UM football just doesn´t have a huge profile in DC. Baltimore just doesn´t seem to be a big football market. Oh, they sell out for the Ravens, but their high school football isn´t that great.
(CBS News) CBS News has learned that the NCAA will announce what a high-ranking association source called “unprecedented” penalties against both the Penn State University football team and the school.
Penguins Fan, I don’t think there is a big disdain of Cincy or any other of the BE teams that are left behind. I know Rutgers fans can be arrogant and I took exception to remarks made by Lville AD and head BB coach, but overall I believe I speak for many in saying that we wish them well.
When their whole 2013 recruiting class flees after
tomorrow’s announcement, maybe they will.
OR they may mean something about the actual penalty, if thats the case it makes me think that they wouldnt give the death penalty b/c thats been done before..i get the feeling I think we may be looking at a very long probation with an incredible financial penaltynthat will set up a fund to care for the victims and pay for an NCAA new program to assure this sort of thing never happens anywhere ever again
Former BE teams should challenge the NC/Greensboro ACC mentality.
Frank MD
According to ESPN “The penalties, however, are considered to be so harsh that the death penalty may have been preferable, the source said”
Announcement coming at 9:00 AM Monday
over the next 3 years and 3 years with no bowls.
And on another front Aaron Berry arrested again in Harrisburg for a second time this summer. You really have to wonder how so many of Dave’s recruits were and still are such idiots…we never saw this with Walt’s players!
PSU needs to rebrand itself…change uniforms and logo..do what Pitt did when it tried to change it’s losing ways…new uniforms, new colors, new logo etc..instead of Penn St they should call themselves Pennsylvania State University Nittany Lions.
They can relocate the statue to the paterno library. It would be a reminder to the students to be quiet.
When the NCAA publicizes that PSU will “wish” they had gotten the “death penalty”, it is a preview to a slap on the wrist because the NCAA is a gutless and could not pull the trigger on the death penalty and wants everyone to think they are tough when they are spineless!
To think that Penn State thought they were too good to have Pitt as a rival! A rival should be someone you dislike, yet respect. There can be no respect now.
Any lost revenue wouldn’t happen for 4 years anyway. There’s plenty of time to fill those spots on the schedule.
Living in College Park, I certainly hope so 🙂