masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
November 3, 2011

Defense Terrifies But Delivers

Filed under: Football,Players,Tactics — Chas @ 10:56 am

With the exception of the Iowa game, the Pitt defense has really done a great job this year. They’ve kept Pitt in games. They changed defensive systems, and have had to play a lot more minutes than they did last year given the change (and struggles) of Pitt’s offense.

There have been no indications that the defense is outwardly frustrated with the offense, or even rumblings of such. Defensive coordinator Keith Patterson has done a very good job as the season progressed of getting the defense to make more stops. Though, he isn’t satisfied.

“What I tell our guys, you can go all the way back to the Iowa game, we’ve just played good but we haven’t played great yet because there isn’t an opponent we have played yet that we couldn’t have held to 15 points or less — not one — so that is what we are striving for.”

Patterson said he wants to “shoot for perfection and shut people out.” That will come down to paying attention to details and maintaining a focus throughout the entire game.

He cited examples of what he was talking about from each of the past three losses (Notre Dame, Rutgers, Utah), instances when the defense lost focus for one or two plays, and it cost them.

That’s part of where the terror comes into play. During the games themselves, I get frustrated with the defense. I literally find myself squirming when the defense is out there. As if twisting and contorting while watching will improve on the angles the defensive players are taking to the ball.Failing to get off the field a lot of times. Giving up big chunks of yardage, and letting the field position be shifted against the offense. As close as they seem to be to making the big play, they are just as close to giving up the big play.

The lack of generating turnovers probably skews perception (and field position). The defense is supposed to force them. Lord knows how many opportunities have been there on interceptions dropped or flat missed. My completely unscientific, biased opinion is that Pitt’s defense has had more opportunities to make big plays on defense than opportunities allowed by opposing offenses to make big plays. The problem is that Pitt hasn’t finished on the opportunities. They’ve droppeed the interceptions. They haven’t quite reached the QB. They didn’t make the initial tackle.

Plenty of reasons to be optimistic each game that it could finally flip, and even more optimism for the future. But lots more frustration in each game.

And of course, another reason of madness with the defense is the constant burning of timeouts when the defense is on the field. There was a mock cheer in the last liveblog when Pitt made it through most of the first half without burning a timeout. I’ve likened the way Coach Graham blows through timeouts to the way Ben Howland does in basketball. And the rationale by both seems similar. They see mistakes or something they don’t like, and just decide they need to talk about it right then and there.

Part of that reduction in timeouts called in the UConn game seems to be from — like the offense — simplifying things. That simplification of the number of schemes. Of shuffling players in and out, also means some lesser playing time for some.

We asked defensive coordinator Keith Patterson about the disappearing acts of players like EJuan Price and Shane Gordon in recent weeks and he said it is all a part of simplifying the defense. He said the coaches realized they were trying to do too much, with too many different formations and too many different players and moving parts. So they’ve simplified some things but in doing that it has meant using less players – or at least settling in on a core group of guys – and the result has been less confusion. That by no means signals that coaches have lost faith in those younger guys, it is just that they have gotten good production from the older guys and frankly it is hard to argue with results.

There’s no question that Price is a future star for Pitt. Not really worried there.

Cinci is the best offense Pitt has faced to this point. They have a good O-line. Really good skill players all over. Guess we will find out if the defense can still deliver.





The burning of timeouts generally is annoying. Burning them when the other team is about to be penalized for delay of game is just about inexcusable. In the past two games, Pitt has called timeout while on defense with the play clock just reaching zero. These calls have come from the coaches, not the players. I get that they don’t want to be caught in the wrong defense, but they have to be aware of the situation when they are burning through these.

Comment by Pantherman13 11.03.11 @ 11:13 am

I think that too much is made about this. We cannot see the outcome if the timeout isn’t called. For example…in the last game…UConn moving the ball, facing a third down in the red zone, Pitt calls a timeout on defense. Things get settled, Pitt gets a stop (holding UConn to a FG)…BIG MOMENTUM SHIFT. Offense gets the ball back and procedes to score a TD…effectively ‘putting the foot on the throat’. Now, we cannot see what would happen if Pitt didn’t call that timeout. Would UConn have converted that third down into an eventual TD? Would they have still ended up with a FG?

I DON’T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT TIMEOUT!!!

Not because it worked but because I feel that this coaching staff UNDERSTANDS how big of a play that down/situation is and sees something that could hurt them. Take a timeout and correct it… I also feel strongly that this is something that the other staff DID NOT do…understand how big actual plays/turning points are. For example, that fourth down against UConn last year…

Comment by George 11.03.11 @ 11:22 am

If Sunseri can play like he did in the USF or UConn game, Pitt will beat UC hands down.

The Defense is the constant, Sunseri is the varible in the equation!

Comment by Joe Kumpf 11.03.11 @ 11:37 am

I’ve been really happy with the defense this year. If only they could hold onto interceptions, then Pitt would have at least one extra win and maybe another. If I remember correctly, the D dropped a couple interceptions including a pick-6 against Iowa, with those Pitt doesn’t lose to Iowa. Saturday should be a great test for the D.

Comment by Wardapalooza 11.03.11 @ 11:49 am

I think the key to stopping Cincy’s offense is shutting down Isaiah Pead. I watched Collaros against USF. When he was pressured, he didn’t respond well. But, he still puts up alot of yards (big plays). Hopefully, Pitt comes out with a good plan.

Comment by Gdodson 11.03.11 @ 12:04 pm

If Pitt stops Pead, Cincy becomes one dimensional; however, a one dimensional Cincy is still better on offense than a one dimensional Pitt. Pitt winning the turnover battle and getting good field position will be keys to the game. I still like Pitt’s chances.

Comment by TX Panther 11.03.11 @ 12:26 pm

No doubt that there is more quality and experienced talent on the defense than on the offense … and the 3 most talented and experienced offensive players are on the shelf (unless Nix plays this week.)

I do agree that Patterson is doing a good job which is enhanced by the talent he has. Makes you wonder if the Tulsa teams were not that talented defensively. I hope and pray that Pitt can continue to recruit quality defensive players .. you know that they will likely get good offensive ones.

Comment by wbb 11.03.11 @ 12:36 pm

I’ve reviewed the Iowa game acouple times since that debacle to review the issues surrounding Pitt’s fourth quarter implosion and it is obvious that although the Pitt defensive performance left something to be desired, the player who really rose to the occasion in that game was Vandenberg, Iowa’s QB. When it was essential, do or die time, he put together drives that was thing of beauty, if you’re looking at it as just pure college football.

The Iowa game was lost because Pitt’s offense could not match that performance blow for blow in the fourth quarter. In fact, we still had the game in hand if we could have just driven down the field on our last offensive possession, ate the clock and put it in the endzone. Nope, no can do, Sunseri throws the game ending interception instead and we shit the bed for the initial time this year on national TV.

The defense is NOT this teams weak link. Even defensive guys who have gotten nothing but ridicule for their play, like Gruder, IMO have played adequately enough to at least give Pitt the chance to stay in ever game that we’ve played.

When the offense does put up the numbers and possess the ball long enough to give the defense a breather, the D has played even better. The only glaring deficiency for the defense has been it’s take away numbers. For sure, multiple defensive backs have dropped a lot of catchable balls thrown thier way. We need some of those passes to be controlled by our brick handed DBs.

Every game that Pitt has lost you can pin on the offense in some way, shape, or form. It’s not all on Tino, even though his play often was so putrid you could physically SEE the stench. It has really been the entire offensive unit thats responsible however. Sometimes the line is getting dominated, other times backs aren’t picking up their blocking assignments and then the receivers have their chance to drop passes, dog routes or just plain not get open fast enough for the play to develop. Tino gets most of the greif however because his position is so essential that when his play is inferior it is so obvious that we forget about the rest of the issues surrounding the poor offensive execution as a whole.

Tino’s play has been all over the map. If he can just continue to play “average” as Graham described his play against UCONN and the receivers get the YAC train consistantly rumbling like they did in that game, then I think we actually have a chance to win this thing on Saturday.

I feel that us loyal Pitt fans deserve to have another surprise win like the USF game. Come on guys show us what you got, beat Cincy!!

Comment by Dr. Tom 11.03.11 @ 2:21 pm

I think taking timeouts to adjust on offense is totally ridiculous unless you are in the last two minutes of the half or at the end of the game.

Is burning a TO worth it just to make a play that may gain you a few yards? If worse comes to worse the QB either gets on the ground or throws the ball into the sideline.

A TO when needed is a hell of a lot more important than one offensive play.

On defense it’s a different story where one blown play can be seven points.

Comment by Reed 11.03.11 @ 5:21 pm

If Sunseri can play like he did in the USF or UConn game, Pitt will beat UC hands down.

The Defense is the constant, Sunseri is the varible in the equation!
Comment by Joe Kumpf 11.03.11 @ 11:37 am

Sunseri is ALWAYS the variable Joe. What’s new?

Comment by EMel 11.03.11 @ 10:06 pm

How many interceptions does this defense actually have for the season?

I remember the Alexi (sp) big pick and runback, which has been the biggest play the D has made all season.

What 2 or 3 other picks the whole year. They better come to play Sat. nite, because Zack Colloras and Cincy can throw that ball around the lot.

If they don’t produce any pressure on the QB, he will pick them apart. So the key is PRESSURE AND SACKING OF THE QB. Or it could be the 4rth quarter of the Iowa game. Hope not.

Comment by EMel 11.03.11 @ 10:11 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter