masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
November 1, 2011

WVU filed a lawsuit in its own state yesterday against the Big East. If you feel like wading through it, you can read it here (PDF). I’ve looked it over, but I haven’t practiced law in nearly a decade. So my opinion that it is pretty flimsy, but for the fact that they are attempting to have it litigated in West Virginia, is not really that of an expert. Would it surprise anyone to learn that the Circuit Court judges in Monongalia County, West Virginia all received their J.D.’s from WVU? Didn’t think so.

The gist of the case seems to be that the Big East is incompetently run, that the departures of Pitt, Syracuse and TCU means the Big East is not the conference they really joined, and that with those departures the Big East is doomed to lose their AQ status in the future. All of which, may (is) true, but irrelevant when it comes to the contract that WVU not only signed, but actively constructed:

…former West Virginia president David Hardesty, a lawyer, wrote the current Big East exit penalties, which include a $5 million departure fee and that 27-month waiting period.

I encourage everyone to read the analysis of the lawsuit by Brian Ewart of VUHoops.com. It’s a solid piece from a guy actually practicing law. I think he’s right about this primarily being about trying to force the Big East to negotiate an exit price, but I don’t think the Big East will back down on holding WVU (and Pitt and Syracuse) for at least one year.

The reason is the same one I have asserted early on. The Big East cannot exist as a recognized conference under the NCAA rules (and BCS) if they have less than 8 members. And for football, that is where they would be. The remaining 5 schools would not be able to get an automatic qualifying bid to the BCS. Who knows how the bowl tie-ins would be affected. And even though the TV contract is weak, it would likely be voided. The economic losses to the Big East and remaining football schools — to say nothing of long-term harm — would be significant and not simply remedied by extra money paid by the departing teams.

The likelihood of getting even one new team in the Big East for 2012, is rather low. Conference USA, for example, requires a one year notice to depart. As does Mountain West. Given the size and budgets of likely members — Air Force, UCF, SMU, Houston, Boise St. — and the exit fees are in line with what the Big East charges, most of those programs couldn’t afford to try and negotiate a higher exit fee to leave early.

Even independents like Navy (or BYU) would have a hard time joining by 2012. There are contracts with 12 different schools for games. An independent would have to break at least seven contracts with less than a year. Even assuming those seven contracts each have a penalty clause for breaking the agreement, that’s a significant chunk of change. Very questionable that a service academy will do that.

The only other claim is that since TCU didn’t have to stay 27 months, neither should WVU. Apparently, though, when TCU agreed to join the Big East it had an out on the 27 months if it didn’t actually play a Big East game before leaving. TCU hardly seems a great analog, since they were in a sort of limbo. They were scheduled to join in June 2012, but were in the midst of finishing out their time in the MWC. Essentially a non-voting member in the MWC and a non-voting member in the Big East.

Ewart is right, though, that the Big East could make this lawsuit a lot more fun by interpleading the Big 12 and members from that conference in a counterclaim. Remember how the SEC was very determined to get all those waivers from the Big 12 and those members before doing anything with Texas A&M? Suddenly it makes a little more sense.

The move to file in West Virginia gives rise to one question. It would appear that this case will be governed by Washington D.C. laws, as that was where the Big East was incorporated as a non-profit. I guess, I would expect that the Big East by-laws would also have a venue designation where any litigation is supposed to occur. In fact I would be floored if there isn’t one. If so, expect that one of the earliest filings by the Big East will be to dismiss based on the venue or in the alternative move the litigation to the appropriate venue.

The Big East could easily tie this up in litigation, well beyond the 27 months if it wanted. Especially by bringing in the Big 12.

Part of me would love to see this advance. The discovery would be fascinating.





I know I’m in the minority, but I have no problem with staying another year in the BE … and of course, don’t blame the BE for insisting we stay. It would be nice, however, if we wouldn’t have to serve the entire 27 month term .. but that still isn’t the end of the world knowing that waht awaits us after that.

Comment by wbb 11.01.11 @ 3:55 pm

You have to love the part were they say Marnatto failed to support the football schools and failed to take proactive measures.
that he favored the BB schools over football schools .
That is what we all have been saying for 6 months or more nice to see it in print .

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.01.11 @ 4:17 pm

I’m with you Chas…I see no possible outcome that allows us to move for 2012. Best case is avoiding 2013 in the Big East.

Discovery would be entertaining. Somehow despite all that has happened thus far with realignment I think there’s still much more to come.

Comment by FG 11.01.11 @ 4:19 pm

I heard Mr. Haney is representing WVU and Oliver Wendell Douglas is representing the Big East!!

Looks like John Marinatto screwed up again!

Comment by Joe Kumpf 11.01.11 @ 5:11 pm

The ONLY way I see anyone leaving early is if SugarDaddy ESPN works behind the scenes and basically tells Marinara sauce to skip the BS and let PITT, Cuse & the Billies go their merry way.

Or else you get a visit from Chris Berman & the Syracuse Media Mafia. haha

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 5:14 pm

@ Joe Kumpf

I thought Arnold Ziffel was representing WVU and Mr. Haney would then be representing the BigEast.

Oliver is far too good a lawyer to take on a clown outfit like the BE. Mr. Haney is much more appropriate for WVU. Don’t you agree?

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 5:32 pm

Whoops, type Mr. Haney of course would be much more appropriate for the BigEast. Much like Marinara, he’s a bad con man.

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 5:34 pm

This is going to blow up in their faces. This is about long-term stability and now they have it, so why do something so risky? Opening up the Big XII and its members to legal action is stupid.

Comment by Chris 11.01.11 @ 5:35 pm

You know I really am proud of how classy Pitt has been through out this whole process.

WVU looks ugly and petty.

Regardless of the real reasons Pitt and Syracuse look classy throughout this whole thing.

DaveD

Comment by DaveD 11.01.11 @ 5:37 pm

Haney might be a bad con man but he never made a bad deal, Marinatto like Mr. Douglas bought the wrong farm! LOL!!

Comment by Joe Kumpf 11.01.11 @ 5:44 pm

And typically Haney made Douglas look like ass….kind of like WVU whipping Pitts ass huh?

Comment by A-Wild 11.01.11 @ 5:46 pm

in all seriousness, regardless of the legal outcome, you have to like the jabs at Meatball and the lack of support for the football schools.
If they had been proactive none of this would be happening. Hey at least Villanova can now get in eh?

Comment by A-Wild 11.01.11 @ 5:53 pm

HAIL TO PITT

Comment by 63 Team 11.01.11 @ 6:22 pm

@Joe,

I’ll take your word about Mr. Haney. I didn’t watch the show that closely to remember all the finer details of Haney’s cons.

I was thinking more on the order that Haney was bascially selling junk. Just like what’s left in the BE, it’s basically worthless. Sure some network will pay it something to broadcast it’s games, if it survives. Because we all know most Americans will watch virtually anything. Even Rutgers at SMU. Well maybe not most. lol

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 6:36 pm

wbb — I am with you. I don’t have any problem playing in the Big East for another season, or even two if that’s what it takes. In my view, I have peace of mind that Pitt has a conference home (ACC) where it can continue to compete at a high level in both football and basketball for the foreseeable future. Not sure what the big hurry is for WVU to get to the Big 12 for 2012. Did the Big 12 make their entry contingent on that or something?

Comment by JCE 11.01.11 @ 7:05 pm

If Arnold is representing WVU then they have a real good shot of leaving early. Mr. Aiffle is wa smarter than that city slicker maranotto, looks better too !

Comment by michael 11.01.11 @ 7:06 pm

Excuse the typos, I meant Mr. Ziffel is way smarter and better looking than that city slicker Maranotto!

Comment by michael 11.01.11 @ 7:09 pm

If the ACC were to invite Rutgers and Uconn right away the league would fold quickly. Cincy and the Ville can’t wait to hit the road also! Get back to hoops Big East!

Comment by michael 11.01.11 @ 7:14 pm

The only way this lawsuit gets any legs is if the Big East makes an unforced error.

In other words, get your popcorn ready!

Comment by Brian in BK 11.01.11 @ 7:16 pm

JCE–From what I have read you may have hit the nail on the head. The story has been floating that the Big 12 made entry in 2012 a condition for WVU to be admitted.

Comment by pitt1972 11.01.11 @ 7:53 pm

So we stay in the Big East for one or two years, that’s really not such a big deal. After hearing Dana Holgerson’s commments about WVU joining the Big 12, that might be good. Holgerson basically stated that they have to dramatically up-grade all their programs.

Comment by Justinian 11.01.11 @ 8:07 pm

Hmmm…Page 3, Paragraph 11 of the suit details who the members of the Big East were in 2000 but there is no mention of Pitt…clever dig or accidental?

Comment by HbgFrank 11.01.11 @ 8:11 pm

I dont think holgerson is right wvu could play BB with any one over there.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.01.11 @ 8:11 pm

Hey… what happened if the Big 10 invites PITT & Cuse before we actually start play in the ACC?

Do we then have to pay another exit fee?
And also wait for another 2-3 years before we can actually compete in it?

Just thought I’d add another WHAT IF, to this already surreal experience known as Expansionapocalypse to Chas and ConferencePalooza to me.

If that happened we might be playing in the BigEast till like 2020 or so. That’s a cheery thought huh. haha

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 8:24 pm

Should read,

Hey…..what would happen….my bad

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 8:25 pm

By say like 2013, ALL the BigEast football playing teams might be exiting to one conference or another.

The Catholic schools will be making more money in exit fee’s than they do at Sunday Service collection basket time. Maybe. lol

Marinara will be living the ‘never ending’ 7 course meal at Olive Garden, forever.

Or until he explodes !

Comment by EMel 11.01.11 @ 8:33 pm

I find it interesting that the Big East invited 3 football only schools and 3 for all sports and excluded Temple completely for both categories. I guess even with world falling apart all around them, Villanova still was able to block Temple’s inclusion.

Comment by Justinian 11.01.11 @ 8:35 pm

I suggest Pitt gets it’s own football house in order over the next 27 months. Bringing home at least a couple BE championships during the next 3 seasons would be a nice bonus and a good warm up for the step up in competition that we are going to encounter in the ACC.

Remain a class act all the way through, tipping their collective hats to the Big East upon finally leaving(whenever that may be).

This too shall pass.

BTW, good attorney joke, Why does every law school class have an even number of students???????

Every graduate has to have someone to sue once they get out of school, who would want to be the odd man or woman out??

Comment by Dr. Tom 11.01.11 @ 8:46 pm

EMel and DR. TOM you both have done better in the past you get no points to night for your jokes.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.01.11 @ 8:53 pm

Bevo vs. Butthead. The power of Almight Texas is on the side of West Virginia. According to the Dallas News and other sources, UT wanted WVU, not Louisville. UT is anxious to settle issues in the Big 12. Butthead, however, keeps talking about inviting schools to join – it’s gone on for weeks – but no written invitations have gone out. Marinatto makes too many excuses. The only mantra he knows: You must stay in the Big East for 27 months. How in the hell does he keep his job? With Deloss Dodds and the UT legal team counseling the Mounties, WVU will be a formidable foe for Butthead and the Providence Mafia.

Comment by TonyinHouston 11.01.11 @ 9:44 pm

Throw this in to the WVU mess. Hot rumor, yes, we all know about rumors, but, what the hell does it matter at this point.

If Georgia fires Mark Richt at the end of the year, guess who a front runner is???

Yep, Mr. Holgersen!!!

Only a rumor, but, some WVU co workers have mentioned it, and not happy about it!!

Comment by Pump-kin-eer 11.01.11 @ 11:16 pm

I don’t know, as an Italian American, what’s worse about EMel’s jokes.

That they’re kind of offensive, or that he thinks REAL Italians would actually stoop to eating at the effing Olive Garden…

Comment by Jimbo Covert's My Dad 11.01.11 @ 11:25 pm

What’s Mr. Pitino’s feeling on all of this. He has to be thrilled right, telling everyone that left, that they had no class and were thieves in the night???

Hmmmm Ricky, should be some great games for you, against UCF, SMU and Houston in hoops!!! I’m sure you’ll get the ESPN3 PC games sometimes!!

LOL!!!

Or, will you be the hypocritical whore that we all know you are, and will be coaching in the ACC, SEC or Big 12 as soon as you get a chance.

Ricky, if you’re still at Louisville in 3 years, a public apology and dinner anywhere you like, on me!!!

Comment by Pump-kin-eer 11.01.11 @ 11:32 pm

No, no public apology, you’re a scum bag, but, you pick the restaurant!

Comment by Pump-kin-eer 11.01.11 @ 11:33 pm

link to espn.go.com

Enjoy the short flights from Florida to Idaho, Big East.

Comment by Cool Hand Nuke 11.01.11 @ 11:50 pm

I love how Marinotto was “stunned” that WVU filed a law suit against the BigEast! Once agaIn right on top of things John.

Comment by Marco 11.02.11 @ 12:07 am

WVU may be getting pressure from Big 12 to get out by next year, whether it is contingent on membership I don’t know. If Mizzou leaves and the Big 12? goes to 9 teams, all of the network partners can open up the TV contracts to renegotiation. Big 12 doesn’t want to go through that. Bottom line, though, is that WVU does not file this lawsuit without the full knowledge, support, and assistance of the Big 12…That is, unless WVU is being counseled by John Marinatto.

My ACC law degree tells me that WVU’s claim is pretty thin, but this is all a negotiating ploy.

Comment by Brett97 11.02.11 @ 12:15 am

what does Holgerson know about WVU’s shooting team which has been national champs and often highly ranked? Also, does he not expect that the men’s and women’s BB team will not be able to compete in the B12? What a pompous ass .. just what colege does he represent anyway?

Comment by wbb 11.02.11 @ 7:23 am

follow-up; WVU’s rifle team is currently ranked 2nd (Kentucky is 1st .. defending national champ is TCU, also a new B12 member) His football team may need an upgrade and possibly its baseball team, but what does he know about the other programs?

BTW, Army, as you might expect, is also ranked in the Rifle poll

Comment by wbb 11.02.11 @ 8:14 am

I still steamed about Holgerson … it should be known that in Jan 2008, WVU whooped 4th ranked Oklahoma 48-28 in BCS Bowl

Comment by wbb 11.02.11 @ 8:17 am

Holgerson is not the guy I want to represent my university. He makes too many disparaging remarks about West Virginia, for my liking. If I’m not mistaken, WVU is the school who gave him the opportunity to be a head coach. He may be a terrific offensive co-ordinator, but a head coach has to handle the media questions better than he does.

Comment by Justinian 11.02.11 @ 9:08 am

Interesting tidbit in the Trib this morning in an otherwise benign article about WVU/Big 12 dance (the full story is at link to pittsburghlive.com).

From the Trib: “Neinas said West Virginia’s acceptance into the Big 12 was contingent on the Mountaineers’ ability to be a full-time member in 2012. The Big 12 needs at least 10 teams to fulfill its television obligations.”

This is the first that I had heard this as more than a rumor. If this is true, meaning that WVU will not be accepted unless they can join for 2012, then this is big news and not such a great deal for WVU. As others have stated above, on first glance the lawsuit almost seems frivolous and its purpose appears to be an attempt to gain some leverage in negotiations. Even if WVU could convince a court that they have a legitimate claim, litigation over breach of fiduciary duty oftentimes takes years to resolve.

At this point, it is hard to see how WVU plays in the Big 12 next year unless the Big East realizes that it does not want to split revenue with them. Is it really possible that they lose their invitation/acceptance if they can’t join by July 1, 2012?

Comment by Pantherman13 11.02.11 @ 9:36 am

Just how pretentious WVU and the B12 is in thinking that it can get an immediate release from the BE?

Maybe Holgerson should note that the WVU and B12 schools’ legal departments needs an upgrade.

Comment by wbb 11.02.11 @ 10:08 am

Even if Pitt, Cuse, and WVU all leave, the Big east keeps their automatic bid until 2013 regardless of if theres 8 teams or not, only for the renegotiation of the qualifiers is it necessary to have 8 teams.

Comment by h2p 11.02.11 @ 10:18 am

Had sympathy for the pump-kin-eers originally.

Then saw some of their message boards and some trolls on here. They went away humbled for a few weeks, when their world was crumbling, but being saved by the Big12, brought them back, and cocky as ever.

So, I will take the schadenfreudian approach, if somehow, the Big12/WVU would fall through!!

If that does not happen, I will look forward to Holgersen going to Georgia at the end of the season!!

I’ll take one of the two, I’m not greedy!

Comment by Dan 11.02.11 @ 10:31 am

@h2p, not questioning you, just wondering though, are you sure about that?

I know they need the teams, in the conference, to do well, for the next evaluation period.

I’ve seen a lot of places saying, that a conference must maintain 8 teams to go to a BCS bowl, even right now???

Again, not questioning, just wondering if you know this for sure??

Far fetched hypothetical. Pitt, WVU, Cuse get to bolt. New teams can’t come for a year.

You mean, one of Rutgers, Cincy, USF, UCONN or Louisville, will go to a BCS game, no matter their overall record, and with, say, a 3-2 conference record, and perhaps all 5 of them having an overall losing record???

I can’t believe there isn’t some sort of “out” for the BCS for this.

You may very well be correct.

Comment by Dan 11.02.11 @ 10:38 am

Dan – according to an espn blog post from a week or so ago, the BCS requirement that a conference have at least 8 teams is only for evaluation of non-AQ conferences that are trying to obtain AQ status. That would seem to indicate that the Big East, as a football conference, could not lose its AQ status until after 2013.

I think some folks have raised a separate question, which is whether the NCAA would still recognize the Big East as a football conference if it had fewer than 8 teams. The reasoning is that if the Big East is no longer a football conference under NCAA guidelines, they would not be eligible to earn a BCS bid. There is a certain amount of logic in this position, but I must admit, I haven’t seen it documented anywhere (to be fair, I haven’t been looking for it either).

As you note, on a practical level, the Big East probably does not want to dip to 5 teams prior to an evaluation period as (i) it might take a hit in terms of whatever evaluation standards are put in place, and (ii) the PR would be a nightmare.

Comment by Pantherman13 11.02.11 @ 11:10 am

Maybe a lawyer can answer this. Can the BE actually legally enforce the 27 month rule on WVU via an injunction and force them to play in the BE next year? Or, will courts only entertain financial compensation for breach of contract damages if West Virginia simply ignores the 27 month rule and bolts to the Big 12 without BE permission?

Comment by pitt1972 11.02.11 @ 11:43 am

I see no reason why an injunction can’t be enforced being there is a written, mutually agreed upon contract in place … but I’m no lawyer either.

Comment by wbb 11.02.11 @ 12:05 pm

I’m just a 2L, but my immediate thought is that an injunction is possible given that the Big East can make fairly good arguments about the immediate, irreparable harm that allowing everyone to leave would do to the league. Typically courts don’t make contracting parties comply with the terms (specific performance) of the contract if a financial alternative is there–it avoids the acrimony of doing something you don’t want to do, etc.

Comment by The Big Egg 11.02.11 @ 1:08 pm

If WVU was to start playing in big 12 next year. just walk away from big east how long would it be before the the case was setteld in the courts would it drag on for years.

lawyers tell us how long what do you think.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.02.11 @ 1:11 pm

Big Egg should get an “A” for the injunction lesson (and yes, I am an attorney). While courts would prefer to settle contract disputes with monetary damages, they will intervene with an injunction if the aggrieved party cannot be made whole through money damages. To further the explanation, and to possibly address Frank’s question, the Big East would probably seek and obtain a preliminary injunction against WVU, which means that they would be barred from participating in the Big 12 even while the merits of a permanent injunction were being adjudicated.

Also keep in mind that this case may involve more than straightforward contract law. I have not read the Big East bylaws or other constitutional documents, but it is very possible that the dispute will at least partially be governed by corporate governance laws, which may create different liability than pure contract law. In fact, WVU’s claim of a breach of fiduciary duty appears to be rooted in this principle. As I mentioned in a previous post, claims such as these often take years to resolve.

The suit itself seems to be an attempt to gain some leverage and force negotiations. That being said, from what is known now, I am glad that Pitt is not pursuing this strategy. From my vantage point, this just seems like a very undisciplined act that is just as likely to have a negative effect as a positive.

Comment by Pantherman13 11.02.11 @ 1:28 pm

Pantherman13–An interesting reply. I am wondering if West Virginia may be in really serious difficulty since it appears from what has been reported that their Big 12 admission is contingent on their playing there in 2012 and could very possibly be revoked if the BE forces them to stay and play in the BE via an injunction.

Could they ignore an injunction if it was issued by a court (i.e.., District of Columbia or Rhode Island court) that was neither a Federal court nor a West Virginia state court?

Comment by pitt1972 11.02.11 @ 1:49 pm

Here’s what I don’t get…the Big 12 needs to stay at 10 Teams because of their TV contract — but they are already at 10 Teams because Missouri hasn’t left yet. The Big 12 has a 14-month waiting period similar to the Big East’s 27-month rule…why not just enforce it and make Missouri stay for the 2012-13 season, and work on getting WVU for the 2013-14 season?

If everyone just stays put next year (2012-13), then they can work on the moves and scheduling for the following year (2013-14). By then the Big East can have some replacements ready to go and would probably be much more willing to let WVU — along with Pitt and Cuse — leave before the full 27 months. And the Big 12 will have 10 teams each year.

Comment by Hank the Tank 11.02.11 @ 2:01 pm

I’ve been wondering about the contingency thing also, particularly since Chuck Neinas was quoted in the paper this morning as saying that their admission was contingent upon playing in 2012. The problem is, if it really is contingent, why would anyone say that out loud? If the Big East knows that, it takes away whatever leverage WVU might have had. I have to think that Neinas misspoke, or maybe he’s just confused as to what “contingent” actually means.

In terms of ignoring the injunction, that is not likely. As long as the court has jurisdiction over the matter, the Big East could easily have it enforced by the courts of another state. If a WV court tried to rule that the other court did not actually have jurisdiction, that would set up another round of legal wrangling, but as long as the preliminary injunction was in place, WVU and the Big 12 would have to abide by it.

I would guess that the next step will either be the Big East asking for the case to be dismissed due to venue (if the Big East bylaws specify where suit needs to be filed), or remove to federal court. If it is dismissed due to venue, then WVU would have to refile in the appropriate court. If it is not dismissed, the Big East could appeal that decision, or they could try to remove the matter to federal court. As an aside, can you see why actually litigating this could take years? Heck, the questions as to venue could take months to resolve, and that is long before anything of substance occurs.

Comment by Pantherman13 11.02.11 @ 2:13 pm

Pitt will leave whenever it wants.

Big East has basically screwed themselves with all of these back door meetings and membership gatherings to which Pitt was not invited.
also – cannot enter into contracts without all members (new tv deals etc… pitt, wvu, and cuse can hold up EVERYTHING)

Marinatto is literally the worst leader in American corporate history – it is so hilarious to watch the Big East blow up in his face.

Some of you may remember my long winded rants regarding the attempts to bring Villanova in for football. Villanova’s program and facilities were a joke, and still are a joke. I also hinted that Pitt powers that be would take this as the last straw for the catholic basketball school favoring incompetency in Big East offices.

(Victory lap)

cannot wait to get out of the BE – who else is ready for trips to Clemson, FSU, Miami, VT for football?

Comment by DeVanzo 11.02.11 @ 2:33 pm

Pantherman13 do you remember when Pitt said they were going to the ACC it came out that they had sent a letter to Marinatto last year.

That letter said that if things did not change and if a better deal came along they would take it.
Marinatto dident put mutch stock in that letter would that letter that was mailed last year be enough to knock 12 months off of the 27 months waiting peroid.
would it count as notification.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.02.11 @ 3:00 pm

FRANKCAN–an interesting question. Without the actual text of the letter I can’t offer an opinion, but my intuition is such that since it is contigent, i.e., “if things don’t get better,” it can’t suffice as notice. If it specified items then it is a concrete step. However, both of those are probably trumped by specific bylaws which dictate a procedure for leaving the conference (hence the waiting period and the exit fee).

Comment by The Big Egg 11.02.11 @ 3:25 pm

Frank – interesting argument, although I think it would be tough to prevail since at best it would be contingent notice (i.e., it only became effective once they had somewhere to go).

If nothing else, Nordenberg is a disciplined attorney (something that I suspect Oliver Luck may not be), and probably prefers to operate behind the scenes on this one. I think the Big East will eventually negotiate the 27 months down, but not until it is financially advantageous to do so. I just wish the Big East would get the damn invites in the mail.

Comment by Pantherman13 11.02.11 @ 3:28 pm

If you want to read what was in the letter not whole text but more than what i wrote go to sept 18 news conference.
with Nordenberg and AD on going to the ACC.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.02.11 @ 4:23 pm

I truly wanted to write down a quick remark to thank you for these pleasant secrets you are showing at this website. My time-consuming internet lookup has at the end been rewarded with really good know-how to go over with my contacts. I ‘d express that we readers actually are undoubtedly blessed to dwell in a fantastic community with many outstanding individuals with insightful concepts. I feel rather grateful to have used the web site and look forward to tons of more cool times reading here. Thank you once more for all the details.
My blog is Travel Tips.

Comment by Travel Guide 11.06.11 @ 3:54 pm

Hey, I can’t view your site properly within Opera, I actually hope you look into fixing this.
My website is about Healthy Cholesterol Diets.

Comment by Healthy Cholesterol Recipes 11.12.11 @ 5:09 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter