I’d love to give you a big overarching message about this game. Some heavily symbolic storyline or theme. Really, though, it can be whatever you want. Make it macro, micro.
I don’t think there really is. It was a wild game. It was an absolute rarity in that so much was happening that Dick Vitale was actually forced to stay on point for most of the game. I’d love to be able to go big picture, but you can’t make those declarations at this point in the season. Doubly so in the Big East.
In fact, this piece by Luke Winn may be the best piece on the game.
It’s best, when covering college basketball, not to let your opinion of a team be swayed too much by one game, one half or one stretch. These are teams of collegians that can look terrific one week, awful the next. I suspect this is why national writers (myself included) are so bad at filling out NCAA tournament brackets. Despite our best efforts, we assign too much meaning to the marquee games we see firsthand — mostly because we’ve been sent to cover those games and write about what they mean.
And when you attend one of these games — such as Monday’s duel between No. 3 (and undefeated) Syracuse and No. 5 Pittsburgh — and the home team opens with a 19-0 run, it becomes impossible not to leap to a number of conclusions.
And whether it is just a senior knowing the big picture, or Coach Dixon’s message being repeated, even the players are cautious about ascribing a big picture to this game.
But when I asked McGhee if the win had any kind of greater meaning for Pitt, he said he wasn’t sure. “It shows we do a great job of defending our home court,” he said, “and that we do a great job against Syracuse.”
Indeed, you can establish plenty of reasons to keep perspective on this win. Let’s keep in mind:
— Pitt is now 13-3 vs. Syracuse since 2001. They continue to run a clinic on how to beat Boeheim’s 2-3 zone.
— Pitt was the home team.
— The preseason rankings had Pitt winning the Big East, not ‘Cuse.
— National ranking-wise there is little difference between #3 and #5.
— Syracuse was without its leading scorer, Kris Joseph.
— Pitt is now 9-0 at the Pete against top-5 teams.
Does it change that Pitt won a big game? That it was a lot of fun to watch? That Pitt is definitely for real? Absolutely not.
Maybe. Except that Boeheim, when he took the podium for his postgame remarks, said something that could be worth remembering. He complimented Pitt’s depth, its defense and its rebounding, and said that it was a better shooting team than he’d seen in the past. “To me, they’ve had good teams,” he said, “but this is a really good team.”
This was coming from someone who didn’t need to say it. Someone who’s used to getting beat by the Panthers, and has perspective that spans seasons, rather than 19-0 runs. If Boeheim can discern a difference in Pitt, then maybe we should, too. There’s no way that he could be caught up in the moment, right?
Pitt sits atop the Big East with a 6-0 record, and 18-1. It’s best start in the conference ever. Pitt has knocked off Georgetown on the road. Beaten the Orange and UConn at home. Survived a game against Providence. The Big East (and college basketball in general) is about dominating at home while doing better than .500 on the road.
To date, the Big East’s championship contenders are defending homecourt as fiercely as Troy Polamalu protects the goal line.
Home teams won both of the league’s two Big Monday games, bringing the collective home record of the league’s top six squads to 17-1.
Most of them still have a half-dozen or so league home games left. It appears the decisive issue in winning the league title will be which can continue dominating the home turf.
Pitt has 5 home games left and 7 on the road. Pitt needs to keep winning at home. Something most who saw last night’s atmosphere don’t see as too difficult.
…But, let’s be honest, that’s mostly a waste of time when the truth is so much simpler.
Why did Syracuse lose to Pitt at the Pete?
Because Syracuse played Pitt at the Pete.
That’s the bottom line. You play Pitt at Pete, you lose. You’re better off challenging Johnny to a fiddle-playing contest in Georgia.
“The Zoo really helps us out a lot,” Pitt forward Gilbert Brown said in reference to the famed student section at the Pete after helping the Panthers to a 74-66 win in front of a record crowd of 12,925. “There is a reason why we’re so tough to play at home.”
Now Pitt needs to keep it up and carry it on the road. The good news for the road? It includes Rutgers, DePaul and USF. The flipside: Villanova, WVU, Louisville and St. John’s.
There will be losses. More likely on the road, than at the Pete. This conference is just too deep and tough for losses not to occur.
Right now, just enjoy the moment.
The Steelers are in the AFC chmpionship game and Pens play Red Wings tonight without Crosby. As much as we can hope for as Pitt fans; Pitt BB is 3rd on the list of Pittsburgh sports stories right now.
Come March they’ll jump to the #1 Pittsburgh sports for a few weeks…that’s the best it is going to get.
1- We knocked off the #4 team and helped our cause come NCAA seeding time. The #1 seed in the East region plays in Cleveland and freakin’ Newark for the first two weekends of the tournament! This was a big win toward getting that #1 seed. We can withstand a loss or two against lesser teams, but these matchups against SY, VN, and WVU are critical and those two locations are aligned perfectly within striking distance for our students and alumni base.
2- We provided a SIGNATURE series of moments with the first 12 minutes that asserted both Dixon’s brilliant coaching and fine, unselfish team execution. Syracuse countered with a nice run of individual shots. Pitts run came first and was a clinic in team ball. I’ve never heard such effusive praise from the broadcasters before in regards to a team performance- which was downright clinical. I was getting texts like crazy from non-Pitt dudes watching that game. This wasn’t one play, it was a quarter of the ballgame. And I for one, will continue to be schoolgirlie giddy proud when Bob Knight toots our praises because that dude has 900+ wins under his pudgy sweater. BTW, I’m trying to think of another instance following sports when one of the top figures in the history of the sport was a regular commentator, broadcasting games, etc…
Also, we continued to highlight to potential recruits the crazed atmosphere of the Zoo (ESPN shot the Pete differently this time, with more panned perspective from the alumni side and corners looking at the Zoo) and the quasi-nexus of sports celebritidom that is Pittsburgh. I know, this has been done before, but it came off somehow better now that the team is at a level of established recognition.
So far, so good.
Especially the article by ESPN’s normally pro-Pitt
Dana O’Neill.
(Dhttp://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/21362/pitt-still-throwing-punches)
Was Pitt’s loss to Tennessee really “inexplicable?” The No. 1 team in the country hasn’t beaten anyone and has nearly lost to its last three cupcakes (PSU included).
I also didn’t like the fact she describe Syracuse as being “depleted.” They were down one guy…
Hope Jamie works em over and over against the full court press! Know he will get it fixed.
Glad to see a measured response to the game. We’ve been here before, killing giants. Given our history in March we’ve become a stoic fan base.
Btw, the only thing last night that’s left me worried is the lingering fact that our defense isn’t quite what it should be. Maybe the stats will go upward a bit when we play more of the mid-lower Big East teams. I’m not sure what it means, the history of teams having to be ranking in the top 10-15 of both Off & Def to be nat’l contenders (and not sure how that statistical history changes if you introduce rebounding margins into the equation). Maybe Dixon is focusing on the offensive side of things more this year given that offense has been an achilles heel in some of our March losses — and maybe its simply been a matter of strategy that we haven’t had to live/die w defense yet. Dixon pretty much always has decent defenseive teams and I’m sure the principles are there. Still, I’d like to see a game or two where we prove our defense can win us a game, just to know its there.
Is this something to worry about or is it simply Jamie’s excellent employment of the tools at hand? I vote for the latter.
Last year we almost always sweated out games in which we never had an early lead and were nip and tuck to the very end. We tried to slow things down to a crawl. We couldn’t get out of the gate like we can now because we didn’t have a bench to rely on.
The Tenn game was a regression to last year. We played not to lose, for example, committing only 5 fouls in the 1st half.
So much more fun for both the team and us to come out and go for the jugular early, eh?
link to syracuse.com
The PPG could muster only 2 articles? Shame on you.