masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
September 6, 2010

I’m not saying there should be deep fear of New Hampshire this weekend, but remember that this is the #5 team in 1-AA. Also Ole Miss showed the follies of complacency when thinking the game was over. To say nothing of Temple needing lots of weirdness to beat Villanova.

Oh, and there is this added fun.

As Division I-AA teams go, the Wildcats are exactly the kind of team most Division I-A teams like to avoid because they are capable of pulling an upset.

In each of the past four seasons, the Wildcats have beaten a Division I-A team on the road and, while the list of teams they upset is not a who’s who of college football powers (Northwestern, Marshall, Ball State and Army), the fact that they have won those games means the Panthers will have to play well to win.

Oh, and naturally New Hampshire runs the spread offense.

For all the talk of depth (outside of the O-line), it’s amazing that when there’s an injury suddenly there was none.

“We basically were stuck and couldn’t use all the packages we prepared,” Wannstedt said. “And that means we had to juggle some players and, at times, we got caught with K’Waun Williams and Jason Hendricks — two freshman — and [cornerback] Antwuan Reed — a first-year starter — in the game.”

If the Panthers are in the same bind this week, they will be forced, as they did for most of the game against Utah, to defend the Wildcats out of their base defense, and that means starting linebackers Greg Williams, Max Gruder and Dan Mason would again be forced at times to face difficult matchups.

This is where there is the obligatory comment about rightfully dismissed Elijah Fields being missed. That said, it’s not like Pitt was able to count on him when he wasn’t kicked off the team, suspended or generally being in the doghouse. Plus, it’s not like Pitt hasn’t had the entire offseason to prepare to be without him. Dom DeCicco is improving. I am betting on “probable” when Pitt puts out the injury report.

There is the obligatory local angle to the game. The New Hampshire coaching staff has a former Pitt player in Joe Conlin, the offensive line coach.

“I think it will be exciting to line up against my alma mater at Heinz Field,” he said. “The kids will get a kick out of it. But I don’t think I will have any mixed emotions about what we are down there to do.”

Conlin, in his seventh year on head coach Sean McConnell’s staff, is a 2002 graduate of Pitt and played for the Panthers under Walt Harris from 1997-2002. He was a two-year starter at defensive tackle.

Of course, the people with the most at stake in this game is any and every Pitt fan who has used the Furman OT game as evidence of why Coach Wannstedt is superior to Walt Harris. If that is the baseline, then this had better be at a minimum, a game with the outcome never in doubt. Not trying to turn this into yet another Harris vs. Wannstedt debate, but since people started busting out that argument after the Utah game it is clear that this still rankles people.

Obviously the Big East had a less than stellar opening weekend. Fair or not, the conference will have an even steeper battle for perception after seeing so many teams fail in the first weekend. On the road or not. Against quality opponents or not. The fact that the only Big East win against a 1-A team was Syracuse over Akron is absolutely embarrassing.

In the Utah game, I remain firmly in the camp that Pitt played too conservatively in the final series before the game tying field goal to send it to OT. I also feel that Sunseri showed a lot from the start of the game to the end. I really have no problem with Sunseri as the starter.

Said coach Dave Wannstedt: “I thought he got a little better. He’ll be better next week than he was this week, and he will be better the week after that.”

Pitt will get a chance to rebound when it plays host to Football Championship Subdivision squad New Hampshire on Sept. 11 at Heinz Field. Baldwin, who had only two receptions for 8 yards in the first half before catching two passes for 63 yards in a two-play span in the fourth quarter, said he expects to be a bigger part of the offense in the season’s second game.

“Coach (Frank) Cignetti is a great offensive coordinator,” Baldwin said. “I’m sure whenever we get back on the practice field and do some film study on New Hampshire, they will do the things they need to do to get me the ball.”

I feel relatively confident in the offense. The defense has the question marks to me.





Don’t know if anyone saw the Navy-Md game last last night but Navy went for the win instead of the tie on 4th and goal and did not make it. The Navy coach said afterwards that he should have gone for the field goal. I think Wanny made the right decision last Thursday night

Comment by Bruce F 09.07.10 @ 10:51 am

WHICH EVER WAY A COACH DECIDES TO GO,AND DOES’NT MAKE IT,THE OTHER WAY ALWAYS SEEMS BETTER.

Comment by CATAMOUNT 09.07.10 @ 11:55 am

i actually like the navy went for it on 4th down, navy just made to many mistakes that game or they would have won that game. College FB takes guts, they played to win, not to go to OT.

Comment by mike 09.07.10 @ 12:22 pm

When you lose, the decision you didn’t make is always the better decision.

Comment by BnG 09.07.10 @ 1:23 pm

Of course, the Navy situation really was not the same as in the Pitt game. Navy made a decision to go for a win on 4th down. Pitt made a decision to play for the tie on 3rd down. I don’t think anyone has suggested that Pitt should have eschewed the field goal, just that they should have taken a shot at the endzone on 3rd down.

FWIW, I have less of an issue with Wanny playing for the field goal late than with the approach with Sunseri for the first three quarters. If the goal is to put a young quarterback in the situations where he is most likely to succeed, I think the coaches failed. At some point, they are going to have to let him pass on 1st down rather than force him to pass on 3rd and long. Hopefully, they can open it up just a little bit more in the NH game so that the attack is a bit more balanced for Miami.

Comment by Pantherman13 09.07.10 @ 2:14 pm

So the polls prove it out. You get rewarded for a win…imagine that. Even PSU and WVU are awarded for blowing out lesser opponents. What do we get for what some posters are calling a “good loss”? We get bounced from the polls. That means overrated for those that can’t read between the lines and that no loss is a good loss. PERIOD.

We had better play to whatever potential we have this weekend.

HAIL TO PITT

Comment by Pitt it IS 09.07.10 @ 4:18 pm

Chas, this is not at you, you provide the info, and my fanorite site it has become. Excellent!!
But, for those talking about the “wildcat”, “tough divison I-AA”, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Blow them the he** out of Heinz Field. No excuses, no learning curves, no “they got some athletes”, blow them out, end of story. The above rhetoric I could deal with during the first, second and third year!!!!!!

Comment by Dan 09.07.10 @ 5:30 pm

Agreed.. Pitt needs to show up and hammer them. The END.

Comment by Snala The Panther 09.07.10 @ 5:33 pm

There is such a thing as a good loss, it just can’t be a team like Pitt. If Ohio State would have lost their first game on the road at Utah in overtime, they would still be a top ten team this week. Thats what sucks about college football. It’s like playing little league baseball on a team made up of all coaches sons.

Comment by Beapanther 09.07.10 @ 7:11 pm

Pitt, I was thinking the same thing as you. We dropped from 15 to something like 27 on the strength of that loss. Thats definitely the writers saying “you suck”. I was not shocked that we lost, but that does not mean I see it as a good thing. It was bad all around, bad for Pitt, bad for the BE. It is one thing to lose, another to look bad losing. You did not see VaTech drop 12 spots for their loss. It is also one thing to play a bad game on Saturday afternoon when 60 or so other games are going on. It quite another to play sloppy on national TV as we did with only one other game going on. Every writer had the chance to witness our bad play. I do have to wonder why they smacked UNC so hard. They damn near beat LSU with 1/3 of their team missing….Dan, agree 100%. We need to come out and burry NH before they even know what hit them. My measuring stick for a game like this is if it is not over by the end of the first half, its not a good thing!

Comment by HbgFrank 09.07.10 @ 8:51 pm

Beapanther. If Pitt were ranked #2 (as is OSU) and lost to Utah, we would still be ranked. Being #15 and overrated is a TOTALLY different story. Now we will fight all season long to finish ( a la last year) #15 at the end of the year with hopefully another bowl win against another overrated program.

Comment by Pitt it IS 09.07.10 @ 10:08 pm

HBG, again, VT at #10 lost to #2. thats what is supposed to hapen – even if it Boise St.!!!! VT also played them hard all game and it was not a sloppy mess of a game on a sloppy of a mess network. Pitt, at #15 lost to an unranked opponent. PERIOD. It does not matter that the utes were favored – and only because it was at home and they have the streak. The other reason they were giving 3 is that the odds makers know how Pitt performs historically in these situations – i.e. OVERRATED.

Comment by Pitt it IS 09.07.10 @ 10:13 pm

i hate writing this stuff, as i said i bleed blue and gold and love Pitt through and through. It is just so damn madening.

Comment by Pitt it IS 09.07.10 @ 10:14 pm

We all should be scared of NH. Seriously. And should we lose, Pederson needs to start looking up his old crony retreads to start interviewing.

Comment by Pitt it IS 09.07.10 @ 10:17 pm

Rankings smankings, the only thing that really matters is that Pitt goes out and wipes the feild with NH players this week. One game at a time. If there is no such thing as a good loss then there is also no such thing as a bad win, all I want is a 1-1 record come Saturday evening and let the rest of the season take care of itself. Go Pitt!

Comment by Dr Tom 09.08.10 @ 7:32 am

After reading some of the post game comments I have come to the follwing conclusions: Wanny sucks, Pitt will always be mediocre, Pitt is overrated (yes losing on the road to a team you are an underdog to makes you overrated, and to say Utah was unranked is a technicality as Utah was ranked in one poll, has been a good program for over 5 years and will be a BCS conference team next year, if you took the same Utah team and changed the name on the uniform to UCLA they definitely would have been ranked in the top 15 to start the season, polls are meaningless, and anyone that looks to polls or uses polls to prove a point is ridiculous, most of the voters don’t even watch college football, so stop using some poll centric argument to make any sort of rational point)and a loss on the road to Utah dooms Pitt to finishing 0-12 on the season.

Haters keep on being haters. Does it make you feel better to be negative and pessimistic? Talk about a lame way to live.

Bottom line Pitt is a lot better now than when Wanny started (Pitt was embarrassing in the BCS loss to Utah and was probably the worst BCS team ever). I’ll be perfectly happy when Pitt finishes 11-1 or 10-2 this year and upsets Texas in the Fiesta bowl.

Hail to Pitt!

Comment by InRodWeTrust 09.08.10 @ 8:17 am

From what I’ve read/heard, UNH runs the “spread” like Navy and WVU. Much more run oriented than pass oriented like Utah/Cincinnati. UNH just does it with 1 and 2 star players instead of 3/4/5 star players. Losing on Saturday is not even a remote possibility.

And well said, InRodWeTrust.

Comment by Chris 09.08.10 @ 12:43 pm

I would love to see PITT run the table as I’m sure most on this blog would to. 11-1 would be great, but I don’t see it with this QB. Unless he improves by leaps and bounds in the first half of the New Hamp. game I would pull him in favor of Bostick for the 2nd half. Despite Bostick’s mechanical flaws he has a stronger arm and better pocket presence. Not to mention ‘game experience’ which Wanny always viewed as most important in most of his player personnel decisions.
The latest being Greg Williams over Tristan Roberts at LB. That nothing like what I mentioned above is even being discussed in the media(I’m not privy to Pgh. radio shows) is quite alarming.

Comment by carolinapanther 09.08.10 @ 6:10 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter