Here’s something to think about heading into the weekend.
When the ACC expanded, it was not a unified decision by the members. To the point that Virginia and the state politics became the swing vote to get expansion done.
As you may recall, the original plan by the ACC was for Miami, BC and Syracuse. This was because Miami wanted to have connections to Boston and NYC where they had strong alumni bases. The problem was that there was significant disagreement within the ACC over this. Miami was problematic enough, but those two schools to the north seemed too far out. There didn’t seem to be the votes for all three.
There was a lot of scrambling and the Virginia legislature was in turmoil and lots of VT pressure was brought on them and the Virginia Governor. The VA Gov. Warner in turn leaned on UVa to back VT or not support any ACC expansion.
The ACC commish found he needed Virginia’s support to get the plan through. So, VT became the school to come with Miami. There still was not enough support at that moment for BC or Syracuse, they waited another year before bringing in BC — after the NCAA rejected their request to change conference championship rules to allow the minimum be lowered to 11 teams.
Pitt is the only candidate (aside from ND) that is within a state that already has a Big 11 member.
Now obviously the Pennsylvania political structure is nowhere near the same and political influence over the major schools seems much more limited — as witnessed by the failure of several attempts to mandate Pitt-PSU play each other annually as states like Florida and Alabama have done.
Now we don’t know how Big Something expansion will work out. It is known that the Big 11 needs 8 of the 11 present members to back an applying school for membership.
(I’m sure everyone can see where this is going.)
So here’s the question: Do you think Pitt and its supporters in the legislature should bring pressure to bear on PSU to back Pitt into the Big Something? Whether this is done publicly or privately is not relevant.
To the point of demanding they not support any other school unless Pitt is included? Would it make a difference? Is it already taking place quietly?
Or do you think that the Big 11 schools would be too unified for PSU to stop it (i.e., at least 8 votes among the other 10 for all other candidates for membership)?
As a fan of limited government and not wild about them interfering in higher education, my natural instincts are to recoil. Of course, the Pitt alum/fan in me is screaming, “By any and all means necessary!”
This may be a no-brainer. Still worth asking.
While Pitt isn’t technically a state university, the state is still a large supporter of both it and Penn State. Shouldn’t the state be able to demand that, in exchange for its financial support that PSU vote in a way which will protect the state’s other investment, i.e. Pitt?
This isn’t a case of micromanagement of the universities by the State. This IS a no-brainer.
If the state’s pumping dollars into these schools, they should have a say in these things.
There’s really nothing unfair or tyrannical about that.
I do, however, think that there are better things for the state to worry about than football.
I’m really just praying that the Big 10 goes the “ginourmous super conference” route here and goes to 16 teams.
Ed Rendell is a New York native and Philadelphian, so he could care less (and he’s out of office in 7 months).
As for the next governor, the two fighting for the spot are hardly good candidates to fight for Pitt, despite being from Pittsburgh; Dan Onorato went Pitt law school, but that will likely be trumped by his undergrad degree from …you guessed it, Penn State; Tom Corbett went to Lebanon Valley for undergrad and St. Mary’s (of San Antonio, TX) for law school [Tom’s not known as a deep thinker…]. Corbett is probably going to win, so we need to get Elsie Hillman and the rest of his sugar-mommas and sugar-daddies to lobby for Pitt!
If left to its own devices, it’s in Penn State’s interest to harm Pitt. Universities are no different than corporations and Pitt is direct competition to Penn State – for dollars and students. That’s why I think the legislature may need to force PSU to do the right thing. It really shouldn’t be a matter of legislators being Penn State fans, it’s in the Commonwealth’s interest to have both schools excel.
If the Big10 ends up taking just one school, even if it’s a Big East member, the conference will survive. If they take 3 or 5 teams and multiple teams come from the Big East, the ACC will follow suit and pick up 2 or 4 teams, and Pitt will be included in that list for sure.
Personally, I hope it’s just Nebraska added and that is that. I do not like the Big10 brand of athletics and I am fine walking away from all that money to try and keep the Big East. We’ve gotten by this long without them. And if we are forced to move on from a non-football Big East the ACC is right there waiting.
– there would be no national security or national currency (the initial recognition of federal interference)
– there would still be no steroid policy in MLB (most recent
– there woould still be no civil rights in at least a handful of states.
I am by no means a socialist or communist (Or whatever trhe apt term is) and would normally prefer less government .. but I am also a realist. But nonetheless, I seriously would hope that Pitt’s inclusion in B10 expansion will not require political intervention.
Virginia’s situation was different because they have no professional football team (unless you count the redskins). PA has 2 NFL teams and its residents are not diehard college football fans. People in Philly by and large don’t live and die by pitt or psu athletics unless they went to one of the schools. It would be a HUGE surprise to me if anyone in PA legislature made so much as a peep about this.
What can Harrisburg do ? Turn up the heat on PSU make it perfectly clear their state allocation will always be at least $22M (B10 share)less than Pitt’s.
Pitt has enjoyed a renaissance both academically and athletically under the direction of Dr. Nordenberg, and lately Steve Peterson. The university is stronger in both areas than it has been since the 60’s when it became state-related. I trust that these guys are tuned in and will make sure Pitt gets the best outcome possible.
At least that’s what I keep telling myself…
HTscriptP
I think Paterno would actually like to see Pitt in the Big 10. Paterno won’t schedule Pitt as a nonconference game because Paterno learned his lesson well from the Ohio State Suck-Eyes, which is to schedule creampuffs at home in the early part of the season and guarantee your team with a winning streak at the start. However, Paterno has no pull in the Big 10. OSU and Michigan run that conference and the rest of them are along for the ride.
Just my opinion but I don’t want Onorato to get elected. Onorato and $pendell are buddies and they both screwed up the Isle of Capri casino proposal that would have provided the Penguins with a new arena at little taxpayer cost. Frankly, I despise OnoRATo, but that is my viewpoint.
I grew up with the rivalry, too. Although I grew up in Ohio and heard about how great the Boring Bowl (OSU – Michigan) was, in most of the 1970s Pitt-PSU was the superior game.
We all have to remember that nobody knows how this will play out. Delaney will likely offer Notre Dame another opportunity. I hope they take it, but who knows?
If Notre Dame refuses, then what? Texas will play Delaney like a fiddle. Texas will not join a conference where they are not the most powerful school, and OSU & Michigan run the Big 10.
Then , who does Delaney get? Nebraska? Missouri? The Big 12 can replace them with some combination of Colorado State, TCU, SMU and Houston.
Rutgers? Take ’em. Please! Rutgers was as bad as Temple not so long ago. Temple actually has a competitive football team in the MAC.
One way or another, Pitt must leave the Big East as it is presently constituted. The basketball only schools have dragged down the football schools.
If the Big 10 offers a bid to Pitt, then Pitt should accept it.
If there is some type of ACC-Big East football school merger, then so be it, and I think this is the most likely thing to happen, the ACC contract notwithstanding. Why? The SEC will not stand idly by. The SEC could easly grab Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Florida State and one other ACC school and be the true superpower conference.
If the worst case scenario occurs, then Pitt, UConn, WVU, either Syracuse or Rutgers (the one who doesn’t go to the Big 10), USF, Cincinnati and Louisville form a conference. Add Temple if their football has improved enough. Throw in East Carolina, Central Florida and Houston. It will be a clear notch above CUSA as presently constituted. Sign a contract with Versus because they want to grow their sports coverage and demand the Big East’s BCS bid. If the other schools say no, then bring an antitrust lawsuit in federal court. Bring in the MAC, the WAC and any other conference shut out if need be. My guess is the other conferences will relent. If not, then nail them all for antitrust violations – which I think they are guilty of now anyways – for treble damages.
I just want to see the Pitt situation resolved and solidified. I would love for Pitt to establish a Division I hockey program. If Bobby Morris can do it, then so can Pitt.
But I digress. Yes, political pressure should be brought to bear, but like everyone else, I question its effectiveness given PSU’s clout and its inability to get the rivalry started.
Pitt alum here in Big 12 country (Manhattan, Kansas). The best move for the Big 12 if they lose Mizzou and Nebraska is to get Arkansas and Louisville.
Arkansas has never been the samesince joining the SEC and would love to get back the Texas link. Not to mention the Big 12 title game will soon always be at JerryWorld (a Razorback grad). Louisville? An absolute no brainer. Better for football for sure and adds a great market for the conference footprint.
Back to topic, the next time a PA legislator’s relative needs an organ transplant at UPMC, he/she should be reminded of Pitt’s clout.
The NYC market is Rutgers. Rutgers would have to receive an offer they can’t turn down, because the State has more pressing issues at present. (NO MONEY!)
If Rutgers makes a move, I would love them to have more fore-site than Boston College and insist on having additional like Northeast schools in the conference.
However, I don’t see a 14 or 16 football team conference working very well. Look at the Big East BB!
I’m not a Big Ten fan for Pitt. Pitt is an Eastern School! We might get lost in the Big Ten. I don’t see PSU written about much in the Metro NYC papers.
Of course, I would like to play PSU every year as well as WV, Syracuse, ND, Rutgers, and maybe Navy. I would even throw in Temple,and Army. I like and see where South Florida expands the Big East market. (Isn’t going South on the Big Tens wish list?
Pitt, at least for now, is the big fish of that group and the Big East It is good to be at the top of the food chain!
I don’t think legislative pressure will work on PSU. They can claim to support Pitt in the Big 10 – and for all any of us know they do – but if a minority of other Big 10 college presidents don’t want Pitt then it won’t happen regardless of how PSU votes – and Graham Spainer will do what Paterno wants in any case.
I said it before. The SEC isn’t stupid. Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma. and Oklahoma State fit in well with the rest of the SEC. The SEC can start their own network and they will wipe up the floor with the Big 10.
The Big 12 should be quaking in their boots right now. They are as likely – if not more so – to disintegrate than the Big East.
Regardless of the outcome of all of this, Pitt needs to be in a conference that is not controlled by private colleges that do not field a Division 1 football team.
“Can the Panthers stop Tony Pike?”
Paul, please give it the hook.
If there is any way I can send a supportive letter etc. to the Big Ten or to the state of Pennsylvania anyone let me know. I feel Pitt is a special place academically, and major atheltically. They desever better national credit than what the national guys give em in both sports, at times.
Again if anyone knows where I can send a supportive letter to pitt joining let me know!
Hail to Pitt!