7 PM on ESPN2 and ESPN360. John Saunders and Fran Fraschilla with the call.
Well, at least I feel good about the telecast. HD. Very good analyst and solid play-by-play. Plus Saunders is Canadian so you know he’ll be on the Olympic Hockey updates.
Usual things. If you need to break the liveblog out of the site, Click Here.
Otherwise, right below.
I think tonight was a little more than a letdown based on the effort, but with ND throwing in absolutely anything for the first 30 minutes of this game, it was really just one of those nights. I am not too upset – actually I think this game could be beneficial in the longer run. This reminds them that they cannot expect to win unless they play hard tough defense and rebound. They don’t have the talent to play half-assed and still gets wins.
After the Nova game, I figured they would lose one of the two road games and end up 3-1, and I still bet that’s what they do. I actually didn’t want them running the table into the BET because I think it would have set them up for failure.
The only thing I worry about is that they still don’t shoot the ball well at all. In the tourney, I don’t know how many games Pitt can win shooting under 35%.
Simply didn’t take it to the rim. Settled for too many jumpers. That game is a lot closer if we get to the line like we have been and stop the clock. I’m surprised we had so much trouble against a less athletic ND team. They packed it in, dared us to shoot the perimeter jumper and dominated their defensive glass.
No doubt we were gassed and they were rested, but the result was surprising nonetheless.
Credit to ND, though. They shot lights out and executed their game plan despite the absence of Harangody.
None of these final games are gimmees. Need the same focus and execution against SJU, Rutgers and Providence that we showed against SU, WVU and Nova. Lesson learned. Hopefully…
A butt kicking like this can actually do them some good.
Jamie should be able to get them refocused quicker than if
they’d lost a squeaker. How would you like to be Harangody?ND actually seems to be playing better without him.
Good points on the shooting and importance of playing good D. Many times I’ve thought of how much this team reminded me of Jamie’s first team with Brown, Page et al. They too had to rely on strong D and if they got suckered into playing a perimeter offensive game, they were toast. It’s might be one of the reasons he likes these guys so much.
Like Dan said, they need to learn from this one and move on.
Hail to PITT!
-al-
Gotta disagree with the criticism of outside shooting. ND played to take away penetration and allow shots from some players. Gibbs didn’t get a lot of open looks, but Woodall, Brown and Dixon all did, and none of them hurt ND for the calculated risk. Woodall had a ton of easy looks and just seemed hesitant to pull the trigger.
The only good outcome was playing til the final whistle. Dixon didn’t let up on his players (or the refs) and sent a message to ND in case of rematch. It would have been easy to bow out late and clear the bench, but the full court press and timeouts after baskets was the most life they showed all night.