masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
January 21, 2010

The advantage of a team having multiple threats was on display last night. Austin Freeman has been hot as the shooting guard and for a good chunk of his time on the court was covered by Jermaine Dixon.

With good reason, Pitt was concerned with stopping Greg Monroe. Pitt’s frontcourt is undersized and Monroe has begun to grasp how much of a force he can be inside. That meant bringing help to slow him down and force him to pass out of the double team. Unfortunately, one of Monroe’s strengths is that he is an excellent passer. He passed right out of the double teams — when they weren’t late — and Georgetown moved the ball very well to take advantage of that.

Specifically Chris Wright found himself uncovered and able to show more of his game than you would expect in a Princeton offense.

“I’m a different type of guard for this system, so it’s a matter of me staying aggressive,” said Wright, a 6-1, 201-pound product of St. John’s Catholic in Washington. “Whenever I see an advantage, I try to take my man. There are different spots where you can take drives in our offense. You just try to read the defense, see where things develop — and attack.”

There’s never been a point guard as physically gifted as Wright running the Princeton offense at the college level. That’s partly true because so many of the point guards who ran the Princeton offense actually played for Princeton, but John Thompson’s been using it since he got to Georgetown in 2004, and Northwestern, Colorado and Richmond all use it, or variations.

Wright got off to a fast start when he got free on an eerily familiar well-executed inbounds play. Jermaine Dixon was actually covering him, but was bumped off on a hedge. Wright went right to the corner and drilled an open 3. Clark hit a 3 and then Wright drilled another one on an open look… and that set the tone for his game.

In toppling its first top-10 team of the season, Georgetown made a statement about the essence of its strength this season. It’s not Monroe. Nor is it Wright. Nor is it Austin Freeman — each of whom has notched a career high in the past month. It is the fact that the Hoyas’ offense spark can break out among any one of several players and, as a result, shutting down Georgetown on a night like Wednesday can be a daunting task.

It was a thrilling game, with the score knotted at 31 at halftime, 11 lead changes and an electrified capacity crowd of 12,677 at Petersen Events Center — most clad in gold T-shirts — that spent most of the time on its feet, hopping up and down, jeering Georgetown players and urging on their own.

It set up an easy storyline of a tale of two guards, proving an irresistible hook with the fact that Gibbs was also being recruited by G-town until Wright committed. Contrasting Wright with Ashton Gibbs.

Gibbs countered by going 3 of 16 from the field, including 2 of 8 from 3-point range, to tie his season-low with eight points. The smooth-shooting Gibbs picked a poor time for his worst-shooting performance of the season.

“Ashton had some open 3s that he normally knocks down, and he didn’t make (them),” Pitt senior Jermaine Dixon said. “He’s our scorer. We’re going to try to find ways to get him open and he’s going to knock them down for us.”

That Wright made them and Gibbs didn’t was a big difference.

Theirs was a game within the game.

Gibbs had a very poor game as I touched on last night. He has struggled in the past couple games against the really good defensive teams that have made stopping him a focal point. He knows he is supposed to score for Pitt, and last night he got frustrated.

Early he tried to wait for his opportunity. He didn’t take a shot until the 14:19 mark of the game — and even that was ill-advised. It was blocked.

Gibbs started forcing things before the end of the first half. In the final 2:44 of the half he took (and missed) 4 shots. He had taken 5 shots up until that point. The frustration was amplified by his missing 3 open 3-point shots in the course of the game. One is a seeming rarity. Three missed open looks seemed like an impossibility up until this game.

While Gibbs was a horrid 3-16 and 2-8 on 3s, the entire Pitt team struggled with their perimeter shooting. Going a combined 4-18.

Unsurprisingly, Coach Dixon wasn’t going to blame the offense for the loss.

“You have to win games with defense, and I don’t think we have with our last couple. We definitely lost this game with our defense.”

It’s admittedly hard to blame the offense when the team shot almost 46% even with Gibbs shooting 18.75%.

So the issue after the game was how Pitt’s defense wasn’t up to snuff.

The culprit, then, was the Panthers’ defense, or modest effort of it at times.

Georgetown (14-3, 5-2), armed with a thorough mix of strong interior players, athletic wings and quick guards, bounced from strategy to strategy as the Panthers (15-3, 5-1) scurried to cover all the Hoyas’ bases. They were 7 of 10 from 3-point range (Chris Wright made all three of his en route to a game-high 27 points) and shot 46.4 percent overall.

“We just (weren’t) there defensively as a group,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “We hadn’t played defense as well as we needed to the last couple of games, and it caught up to us tonight.”

I can’t help but think that part of the issue on defense was that Pitt was so focused on stopping the frontcourt for this game. Monroe, Vaughn and the others finished shooting only 9-27. Pitt was doing everything it could to keep the ball out of the post. It helped open things up for guards to drive and get better looks on the 3-point shots

Austin Freeman was checked mainly by his own foul troubles that limited him to only 27 minutes — but still shot 4-6 — as the Hoya guards ended up going 17-29 and 6-8 on 3s.

Jermaine Dixon was trying to stay philosophical after the loss.

“We still got a long way to go,” Jermaine Dixon said. “We’ve got a lot of games left. We were looking forward to going undefeated, but you don’t have a night off. One loss doesn’t mean anything.”

Given that Pitt had won 8 straight, started 5-0 in the Big East, and the level of competition faced in the conference; I agree that it is kind of hard to get too worked up over this loss.

It only becomes an issue if the team doesn’t bounce back.

Pitt won its past two despite, not because of, its defensive effort. So said Pitt coach Jamie Dixon. And Wednesday’s game needs to serve as a reminder that just because these Panthers aren’t expected to be 5-0 doesn’t mean they’ll be treated by opponents like they’re 0-5.

On the other hand, because of such a wonderful and completely unexpected start to the Big East season, the Panthers deserved a mulligan. In the grand scheme, one loss in the Big East, particularly to Georgetown, won’t hurt those NCAA Tournament chances. Besides, no Pitt team in the past eight seasons before this had made it to 6-0 in the Big East. Every one of those teams went to the Tournament, and a few won conference titles.

So was this an inevitable winter pothole on the Pittsburgh road, or will it beget the latest doomsday theory?

The Panthers must treat it as both. Now that they have successfully convinced most of the country that they are a good team, they need to convince themselves and show they can bounce back with a win over Herb Pope and Seton Hall on the road Sunday. This game is history.

But they also must take notes from Wednesday’s effort as to not be doomed by repeating it.

Yep. Next up a road trip to Seton Hall. They may have lost a lot of close games, but they are definitely the kind of team that can torch Pitt. Pressing defense, an unpredictable perimeter threat in Hazell. Size and versatility in the front court. They desperately need a signature win to get to those preseason expectations (and Gonzalez’s job security) of making the NCAA Tournament.

Lost in the, well, loss, was some of the good things Pitt did on offense. For much of the game, Pitt had excellent ball movement. When Pitt remembered to work the ball inside, Gary McGhee showed much better hands. He handled passes without fumbling or having to gather as much. Nasir Robinson continued to play with confidence that carried from the last game. But for foul trouble he would have been out there more.

Gilbert Brown had his stroke. 8-9 shooting, and not being selfish (though, in the second half he probably could have stood to be).

Wanamaker struggled to score, but was his scrappy self. He led the team with 13 rebounds and 7 assists. It was Wanamaker — not Gibbs or Dixon — who more often than not could get the ball inside and make passes.





Concur with the sorta sucks. Walking out last night I was bummed that we lost at home and the streak was over. I also didn’t like some of the glares being made on our defenders by Hoya players after a nice play. That being said, we will have BE losses. Our back court couldn’t hit a jump shot….quite a few bricks. I’m not worried about Gibbs, he’ll get his head straight for the next game. But Wanny has only hit one jump shot (albeit a big one) in the last three games I believe. Dixon has been almost as awful. We need one of those guys to be more consistent with the outside shooting…especially since we do not have a guard coming off the bench that is threat.

Comment by Final Four 01.21.10 @ 10:51 am

I would’ve liked to have seen Pitt try Woodall in the game a bit last night. I don’t think he played at all, but it may have been an opportunity to move Gibbs to the wing and get some better looks than he was getting for himself. It’s not as if Georgetown was using a press like they were worried about with Louisville, so getting into the halfcourt set wasn’t much of an issue. But having Dixon continue to shoot over the zone is not going to end well most time.

After seeing the way the zone flustered our guards last night you can bet they’ll start seeing a lot of it. I think getting Gibbs on the wing, even if just for a few minutes here and there, will force teams to think twice about that.

Comment by 85 01.21.10 @ 11:22 am

I thought Pitt did relatively well on defense except for protecting the 3 point line. Gibbs definitely forced a ton of shots. Brown was awesome. I thought Wanamaker was good. I think he realizes that he doesn’t have a great jump shot and that his game is all about taking it to the hole. An area I wish Dixon would just stick to. It frustrates me to see Dixon shoot so many jump shots, esp 3’s. He’s not a shooter at all. Only a slasher. And with that being said, he has problems finishing. Taylor is another guy who needs to finish. Too many missed layups by this team.

Comment by MoE 01.21.10 @ 11:38 am

Woodall played but his minutes have been down lately and not being replaced by Adams … which means Gibbs is getting many minutes as of late. While he has been Pitt’s best player for most of the year, I would like to see him get a few more breathers especially since tired legs bother shooters. I still remember playing MSU in the NCAAs two years ago, and that 3 point shooter was not effective for the 1st 30 minutes … Izzo sat him for 5 minutes … and then he came in and buried three 3s which turned the game in their favor.

Comment by wbb 01.21.10 @ 11:41 am

next three are really winnable: SHU, South Florida, St. Johns (though for some reason they always play us tough). I think an 8-1 start is a real possibility, and even if they drop one 7-2 is great.

Need to take care of bussiness. They got through as brutal a start to a schedule I have ever seen at 5-1…now they need to be consistent and beat the mid to lower tier teams.

Comment by steelcty 01.21.10 @ 11:48 am

The way I see it, this loss was “situational” rather than “systemic”. I do think that the better team won the game, but that does not mean Gtown would beat us if we played them again. Hopefully, we will get a shot at them in the BET. So far, I know this team can play with any team in the Big East (except NOVA and we will find that out next month). I’m confident that this team can play with most teams in the country. For me this season has gone from “Oh well, lets watch this new team grow and sneak into the NCAAs” to “Oh man, lets go get em and get back to the Sweet Sixteen!”

Comment by HbgFrank 01.21.10 @ 12:44 pm

Couldn’t agree with you more HbgFrank, but Pitt has more than surprised me this year, so I am not ruling out a win against anyone, and that certainly goes for Nova. On any given night, anyone can bet you in the BE and that goes for Nova. Noone will go undefeated in this conference. We have won the games that we were supposed to lose, now we need to take care of business and not lose the games we were supposed to win.

Comment by ltl49 01.21.10 @ 3:13 pm

Sad,but not surprised by last night’s outcome. Nothing to be ashamed of,however. More good than bad as team is still a work in progress. Brown showed his athletic prowess. Hope this continues. Gary seems to be getting better although he was clearly outclassed several times. The kid is still a pleasure to see improve. Incidentally, for pure basketball enthusiasts, the upcoming match between host Syracuse and G’town should be a classic. They are two of the best three in this year’s BE. I still figure we will win 12 before the conference season is over. But, we all need to realize that the BE schedule is JUST PREPPING FOR THE TOURNAMENT. George from Columbus

Comment by rev. george mehaffey 01.21.10 @ 3:29 pm

Gibbs looked tired last night. He didn’t seem to have his legs under him on his jumper. He seemed a half step slow on defense.

Other teams have realized that he is the most dangerous player in Pitt’s offense and they have shaded their defenses to stop him. Most nights he (and pitt) is good enough to still hit shots and makes plays, but it’s draining.

It also looked like, for the first time, after forcing a few shots and missing, he lost a little confidence in his shot. The last two threes he took looked rushed, uncomfortable and un-gibbs-like.

The BE is a GRIND. Every game is tough, every team can play. For Pitt to win, they need to play with energy. They get a lot of it from their best player (Gibbs) and last night for whatever reason, he just didn’t have it.

Would like to see Woodall get some more playing time. It is a chicken and egg thing. He needs to play better to earn more minutes. But in order to play better, I think, he needs a few more minutes. A still maintain that this team will rise and fall with the three “weakest links”, Robinson, Taylor and Woodall. They are talented players who bring something to the game that would cause other teams problems, but they are all too inconsistent right now.

Time to move on to New Jersey. The Hall is tough. But I’m confident Jamie will get pitt will get back on track.

Comment by Boubacar Aw 01.21.10 @ 3:54 pm

It almost feels good to be disappointed, like at least we expected to win, which wouldn’t have been the case back in december

Comment by Kevin 01.21.10 @ 4:15 pm

One factor I haven’t seen mentioned is that this team was trying to uphold “the second longest home winning streak in the nation” only mentioned a million times on ESPN and elswhere. That had to put a little extra pressure on this young team – maybe even more than playing on the road. Might be a reason for some of those forced shots and defensive mental lapses at the end. Just a thought.

Still very proud of how far these guys have come. They play Jamie Dixon bball in the finest sense so I see why he’s so high on them. Expect continued improvement and strong runs in the BE and NCAA tourneys.

Hail to PITT!

Comment by TampaT 01.21.10 @ 4:17 pm

Hope that the Pitt players don’t deem Seton Hall as a start of the easier part of the schedule … from what I saw, they played Lousiville better than we did. Pope will be a challenge to defend and Hazell is ebe more capable of putting up big numbers as was the Hoyas’ C Wright

Comment by wbb 01.22.10 @ 9:12 am

There was a productive stretch in the second half of the Georgetown game when the line up was Gibbs, Dixon, Wanny, Brown, and Taylor. Arguably, this is the blogospher pundit’s dream team. I actually thought it was really successful. They had a series of strong defensive stops and some good looks on offense. I remember being a little surprised with Jamie switched it up- I believe with Woodall and McGee coming in.?.?. It’s been a couple of years since I could complain about coach’s substitution habits. He’s gotten us to where we are, but I sometimes feel like he does a bit of sub-by-numbers rather than let a gut feeling go. Well anyway, I’m curious to see that line up out there again together and what that particular mix can do through longer stretches of time together.

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 01.22.10 @ 11:25 am

Perhaps the rest of the BE is getting a better bead on us, our strengths and weaknesses. Frankly, there’s been no breather on our schedule so far, nor will there be the rest of the way.

Doc Carlson would be proud, however. These are indeed “Mighty Mites.”

Comment by steve 01.22.10 @ 12:08 pm

SilverPanther – I remember that stretch. It was actually the first time in the game where Taylor became more physical on the defensive side. Earlier in the game, when his man would get the ball near the low post, Taylor was backing off to give space. The result was that the offensive player (usually Monroe or Vaughn) would simply back into the hoop and get a fairly easy shot. Starting with that stretch, Taylor started bellying up to the offensive player, making him work much harder to get inside. It was still a tough matchup, but Taylor did play better defense later in the game.

One thing that struck me in the second half was that Pitt’s offense became much more stagnant on the interior. The ball stayed on the perimeter, and the center (whether McGhee or Taylor) seemed to disappear. I was a little surprised that Georgetown’s zone had this great an effect.

Comment by Pantherman13 01.22.10 @ 12:20 pm

BTW, did anyone catch the end of the Seton Hall-Louisville game last night? I’m curious that none of the national media are really picking up on the final seconds of that game. For those that missed it, Louisville was trying to come back, and actually managed to hit a 3 pointer to pull within 2 points with about a second to play. The Seton Hall inbounder took the ball, walked across the inbound line, then realized that the game was not over, and appeared to try to inbound the ball, but not finding anyone open, just held it. When he realized that he was not where he was supposed to be (or the official reminded him), he stepped back out of bounds over the end line, threw the ball to the referee, who then threw the ball back to him, and he inbounded to a player who was immediately fouled. The game was essentially over at that point.

The question is why the ref did not call a violation? The announcers seemed surprised; Rick Pitino was incensed. Louisville would have at least had a chance because they would have been inbounding from under the Seton Hall hoop.

So, should this have been called? Did the Seton Hall player avoid a violation by throwing the ball back to the ref? Should the ref have been advising the player to step back out of bounds (which appeared to be the case)? At the very least, should 5 seconds have been called?

Comment by Pantherman13 01.22.10 @ 12:28 pm

Pantherman, didn’t see the end of the game but here what was written about it in the game account in the Louisville Courier – Jornal:

Then came confusion.

Lawrence attempted to inbound the ball while standing on the court. The official, citing an inadvertent whistle, allowed him to step out of bounds, and the Pirates survived
—-
that is that what written about it

Comment by wbb 01.22.10 @ 1:05 pm

Seton hall is going to come after us.

We were lucky against Ville and it ran out against a better gtown team.

I wish Gil Brown would take over more… he clearly can. (especially when everybody else is struggling)

Comment by Snala the Panther 01.22.10 @ 1:26 pm

Back to Taylor- I thought he played well against Monroe, who’s got a bit more of a finesse body and finesse game. But Vaughn, and all his stubborn girth, just tore him a new one. It was Vaughn who kept backing him in. Monroe hit some free throws late to put him in double digits, but offensively I thought they did a decent job of containing him. I think it’s fun to watch Taylor’s progress coming along. It seems like he’s right on the threshold of really making a contribution. I liked seeing him smile with glee coming down the court after stuffing down a put back. I hope he does some offseason conditioning though. He still looks kind of baby soft. Maybe Gary can give him some tips.?.?.?.

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 01.22.10 @ 1:36 pm

wbb-thanks for the info. I found a couple more links with opposing views of the play:

link to rivals.yahoo.com

link to ballinisahabit.net

The inadvertent whistle does make some sense, since it appeared that several players stopped moving at about the same time.

It again raises the question of whether refs are overworked and therefore missing calls. My personal opinion is that the quality of officiating has deteriorated over the last several years, although I’m not sure as to the reasons why.

Comment by Pantherman13 01.22.10 @ 1:43 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter