masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
September 8, 2009

Really not much to say about it.

Dion Lewis was the stud. It may have been against 1-AA competition, but it was impressive with gaudy numbers of 129 yards and 3 TDs. A great debut for the freshman.

The offensive line had no problem with run blocking. Pass protection, however, was a different issue.

“We have work to do. When we had to throw the ball, I wasn’t happy with the passing game on third down from a protection standpoint.”

Said Pinkston, “They brought a lot of fire-zone blitzes, but we’ll be better at it next week. We missed a couple of calls. It’s something we have to work on, but we’ll pick it up next week.”

YSU still has not scored a TD against 1-A foes, as the best they could do was a FG.

Pitt’s D-line gets the credit for stuffing YSU all game. Especially not letting the YSU QB get outside the pocket to create or do much of anything. That’s the goal all season.

Before the game, an article about how Pitt would use screens among other things.

…but fans who are expecting big changes in either scheme or philosophy surely will be disappointed.

Cignetti said he and Cavanaugh share a lot of the same ideas about offense, and the changes he has made have been subtle.

“There might be some different formations and some different shifts and motions,” Cignetti said. “And maybe there is a little more wide-open approach in terms of screens and deceptives, but the foundation is the same. Make no mistake, the foundation that Matt Cavanaugh built here in the run game, protection system and passing game is the same.

“You will see some wrinkles that our offensive staff put together.”

Cignetti said he comes from the same mold as Cavanaugh and has always favored a pro-style offense which is centered around a solid run game and uses multiple-personnel packages and gives opposing defenses a variety of looks.

And he also made it pretty clear that the offense he installed had to first receive a stamp of approval from his boss, head coach Dave Wannstedt.

The screens were there, but the most noticeable thing to me was that they were not slow developing screens that relied on deception or overuse of the bubble screen. Instead, they were quick and fairly crisply executed. Get the ball out there and let the athlete do what he can. This definitely works well with a player like Dorin Dickerson.

There was also that bit of foreshadowing about it is still a Wannstedt team. So, as usual there are always questions about the coaching and decisions.

* The passing game is not ever going to be dominant. I think we all can see that the deep ball is never going to be a strength of Bill Stull’s. But once the game was in hand, say at 21-3, I’m not sure why this wasn’t worked on more. Yes, it is nice you can line up and knock a I-AA team off the ball and run it at them and it is nice that your receivers could make their corners miss on those wide receiver screens. But a game like this enables you – almost like an exhibition game in the NFL — to work out some kinks and I’m not sure Pitt did any of it. Instead, they proved what we already know — that they can beat a physically inferior opponent by running the ball and playing defense.

* I’m not sure what was worse — the fact that there was a mix-up with putting Bill Stull back in the game or the fact that Dave Wannstedt admitted as much. Luckily Stull didn’t get hurt or throw a pick six or something because someone would have had some explaining to do had something bad happened.

I don’t think there was any way that Wannstedt could plausibly deny the mix-up occurred. Stull was out of the game. He had a baseball cap on. Sunseri was holding his helmet on the sidelines. It was clear to anyone watching the sidelines that Stull was done for the day — until he wasn’t.

Still don’t know how that could have happened, but as far as inexplicable Wannstedtian coaching brain farts go, this one was of little harm other than some booing the action and creating this hand-wringing over booing. I, however, find this explanation highly plausible.





[…] This post was Twitted by pittbuzztap […]

Pingback by Twitted by pittbuzztap 09.08.09 @ 1:31 pm

Some nice national attention for Dion Lewis in the ESPN Forde Yard Dash column:

link to sports.espn.go.com

Comment by Dan35 09.08.09 @ 2:00 pm

One thing that I found interesting was that the coaches did seem to open up the passing game just a bit after Sunseri entered the game. They were very careful in calling pass plays with Stull – most were either screens or short dumps, with the emphasis on yards after the catch. Very few down the field or over the middle attempts. When Sunseri came in I was quite surprised that they let him throw at all, let alone over the middle.

Ironically, Stull’s best pass of the day came after he was inadvertently reinserted into the lineup when he hit a receiver over the middle for a first down. This area of the field will be open in future games, and if Stull can hit it, and the coaches allow him to try, this offense could still be very good.

I have no idea what this means, if anything.

Comment by Pantherman13 09.08.09 @ 2:05 pm

Any thoughts on Buffalo sans Starks? Ironic how they’re coming off a win at the Sun Bowl.

HTscriptP

Comment by Cool Hand Nuke 09.08.09 @ 2:48 pm

Buffalo 17 Pitt 16, Wanny is out coached by the up and coming Turner Gill!!

Comment by Sam "Ace" Rothstein 09.08.09 @ 3:20 pm

Team speed is unbelievable this year.

Comment by dugdog 09.08.09 @ 3:46 pm

Yes, they look fast but without a passing game they are ging to be a middle of the pack big east team.

Comment by Henry 09.08.09 @ 4:03 pm

Henry,

I agree, Pitt does have a few highly skilled and game changing players on the offensive side of the ball.

If the QB cannot get the ball down field to stretch the defense then it will be a lot of skill not being utilized to its full potential.

Saturdays game really didn’t give us any indication of how good this offense is.

Buffalo will provide a good test on how the offense will perform in a hostile environment.

I suspect Buffalo will play the run exclusively and dare us to pass, this game reminds me of Pitt’s 2003 game going into Toledo.

Lets hope history does not repeat itself in the MAC.

Comment by John 09.08.09 @ 4:28 pm

Oh man, a Casino reference. I believe Ace was supposed to be an expert at sports gambling in that game too. Is this a sign??

Buffalo did give us a very good game last year. Playing these mid majors at their stadium is always a lose-lose proposition, I don’t really like it.

Hmmm….

Comment by Jimbo Covert's my Dad 09.08.09 @ 6:46 pm

Hoop Scoup.2 brothers, 7’2″ and 7’4″ enrolled in a western pa school today. 7’2″ may be no 1 player in the country when a senior.

Comment by alcofan 09.08.09 @ 7:39 pm

18th 2010 verbal

link to pod08.prospero.com

Comment by wbb 09.08.09 @ 7:53 pm

For those of us outside of the Pittsburgh TV market, the Pitt vs. Buff game this Saturday will be televised on Dish Network channel 438 (SNY) aka the Big East Network. This is what the current schedule for SNY shows.

Comment by HbgFrank 09.08.09 @ 8:08 pm

Man, does the national media love to jump to conclusions after one game! Last year they wanted to shut the season down and hand USC the championship after they beat down the suckeyes. Don’t they remember Oregon State. Reign it in a bit ESPN and collegefootballnews.com. Nobody wins championships in week 1.

Comment by Omar 09.08.09 @ 9:10 pm

ESPN is all about the top teams and name in any sport, and they continue to talk about them ad nauseum (Red Sox, Yanks, Favre, Tebow, UC, UF, etc …. over and over) I ove the live game coverage but take evrything else (except PTI) with a grain of salt

Comment by wbb 09.08.09 @ 9:25 pm

the mixup strangely worked out for the best. Stull came off the bench and led the team for a touchdown. Sunseri came off the bench a second time and led the team for another TD. What could be better experience than that? I liked it a lot.

Comment by IronManEE68 09.08.09 @ 9:30 pm

I’ll be interested to see what the Pitt offense does against Buffalo’s defense. Their defense managed to keep McCoy bottled up, relatively-speaking (20 carries, 93 yards), but he scored 3 touchdowns. Stull actually had one of his better days in terms of completion percentage (22-for-33) and yardage (241 yards passing) against the Bulls last year. At least five different receivers had three catches last year.

That was in Cav’s offense, so I’ll be curious to see what Cignetti has him doing in this one.

I think Buffalo would’ve had a tough time moving the ball against Pitt WITH Starks, who I believe should be a legitimate first-day pick in the upcoming NFL Draft. I do know that Brandon Thermilius is a decent back. I’ll be interested to see what Mario Henry does. Henry hails from my hometown of Erie, and I believe was recruited by Pitt.

Comment by Stoosh 09.08.09 @ 11:19 pm

Pantherman13 – regarding the staff opening up the passing game for Sunseri. I’m not sure it was specifically called like that. IMO the staff was pretty much going to stick with low-risk plays in that game no matter who the QB was until we had a big enough lead to make sure turnovers wouldn’t effect the outcome of the game.

Last year’s BG game is burned into DW’s psyche – alone with the four turnovers he continually points to as the cause for the loss – no way in hell was he going to let that happen again.

If you remember we went into the half with a 21-3 lead, and in our first series of the second half the first two pass plays were longer throws down field with Stull as QB – one the 21 yard pass to Baldwin and the other the 24 yard pass that was intercepted. Earlier we called a deep ball for Baldwin (from Stull) when he had single coverage – and missed.

Also – if you watched the game you’d see that we only called one downfield pass for Sunseri – the long completion to Baldwin. Other than that he was running just about the same plays Stull was – and Stull actually had more downfield shots called by the staff – which probably was the result of running more plays.

I don’t think the staff did anything different based on who was in at QB.

Comment by Reed 09.09.09 @ 5:44 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter