masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
March 1, 2009

It wasn’t as comfortable as I would have preferred. I think the hope was that Pitt would come out from the opening tip, impose its will on Seton Hall. Not turn the ball over, shred and dismantle the Pirates and hold them to perhaps 30% shooting. Is that about right?

That didn’t quite happen. For the second straight game, Pitt was the big game target on Senior night. Seton Hall came out extremely fired up to play. Specifically Hazell and Mitchell shot very well in the first 10-15 minutes. That allowed Seton Hall to fire up the press and actively attack on defense. Pitt struggled with turnovers for the first half. 14 turnovers in the first half. It also didn’t help that DeJuan banged knees and only played 12 very quiet minutes. Despite all the problems, Pitt held a 5 point lead at the half.

In the second half, Pitt completely took control. Not with switch flipped, but slowly and steadily. Just being the superior team — and taking care of the ball. While Pitt had 9 turnovers in the second half. There were really only 7 that took place in meaningful minutes. And against a team that presses and is that aggressive, I’ll take that. Two of the steals came in the final 45 seconds when Pitt had all bench (Frye, Tiesi, McGhee, Robinson and Gibbs) in the game. All that did was allow Seton Hall to make the final score look closer than reality. They scored 8 points in the final 45 seconds to make it only an 11 point road win.

Looking from the perspective of those in NJ, Pitt was simply a better team.

There was a ton of energy in the building at the opening tip and that rubbed off on the Pirates to start the game, but Pitt took their best bench and stayed upright. Considering how well the Hall played in the first half, it didn’t bode well when Pitt walked into the locker room with a five-point lead. A 25-8 rebounding edge helped that along.

We tend to look at it only in terms of what Pitt did and didn’t do. The fact is Seton Hall was playing very well to start the game, but Pitt did not get overwhelmed or flustered — unlike what happened in Providence. One of the beat writers from the NJ Star-Ledger had running updates during the game. Again, the theme was that Seton Hall was playing some of their best basketball early, but Pitt was just stayed with their game plan and steadily took control.

Seton Hall’s coach, conceded after the game that Pitt was just plain superior.

“It was just Pittsburgh being better than us,” Hall coach Bobby Gonzalez said. “We didn’t have an answer for Sam Young. … We didn’t have an answer for them on the backboards. So many of them can make a play.”

Pitt’s big three – Young, DeJuan Blair and Brooklyn product Levance Fields – had strong second halves as the Panthers pulled away. After intermission, Young scored 17 of his 29 points, Blair had all of his nine and Fields contributed eight of his 10.

Here’s the difference with the Providence game and Seton Hall, with regards to the turnovers. Pitt didn’t stand around looking stunned and off-balance. They got back on defense.

Unfortunately, they couldn’t do much with those opportunities. Pittsburgh turned the ball over 23 times, but the Pirates could only turn those into 19 points, while the Panthers turned Seton Hall’s 15 turnovers into 23 points.

“We’re a team where we usually convert other team’s mistakes,” Pirates guard Paul Gause said. “For some reason, we just weren’t able to do it. It had a little bit to do with them, but it had to do with us too. We have to take that into account and try and fix that.”

And once more, 4 of those points off of turnovers came in the final 45 seconds.

Sam Young had a tremendous game against the Hall.

Young scored 29 points and grabbed 10 rebounds to lead No. 1 Pitt past Seton Hall, 89-78, last night at the Prudential Center. The victory came five days after the Panthers lost in an uninspiring effort at Providence, one day after regaining the No. 1 ranking.

“Sam is a great scorer,” junior guard Jermaine Dixon said. “When he rebounds like that he’s going to get a lot of points. He saw we were struggling a little bit there, and he stepped up.”

The scary point came early. Not from Seton Hall playing close in the first half, but DeJuan Blair lying on the court in pain after banging knees.

When DeJuan Blair fell to the ground after banging knees with Seton Hall’s Jeremy Hazell early in the first half Saturday night, a shockwave rippled through the Pittsburgh bench.

“The first thing that comes to mind is, ‘Oh my God,'” Pitt senior guard and Brooklyn native Levance Fields said. “He had two ACL injuries in high school. It’s a scary sight. You hope for the best.”

Part of why Pitt was able to handle Seton Hall was that even without Blair, Pitt outworked Seton Hall for rebounds. Pitt pounded them 44-21 on the glass. The Pirates just could not get second chance shots.





Marquette has lost 2 in a row, and dominic james in the last week…we need to jump on them early and not let them make it a game……

in #1 seed news – the beast has 3 strong cases for them and only 2 of us are going to get them….we need to step up in this next week and in the BET or we are going to be a #2 seed to either UNC or Oklahoma/Memphis instead of a #1 seed with possibly Duke or Mich St……..

Comment by schoey 03.01.09 @ 5:02 pm

Before we feel too high and mighty about winning on the road, remember there is one team that has yet to lose on the road all year — UConn. Of course, Pitt may be the only team not to lose at home this year (not sure.) Marquette played well without James today; should be an interesting final week.

Funny stat about last night’s game — Pitt went 24 for 31 from foul line. 4 of those 7 misses were on tech fould shots — I read where Fields missed 7 of his last 8 tech foul shots (maybe he should only shoot them if it is in the last minute of the game.)

Once again Pitt was troubled by quick defensive players (LVille, Nova, Providence). Wannamaker and Brown continue to try to dribble thru 2 and 3 guys at a time — they (Pitt) have to improve in this area before the NCAA.

Comment by w bill 03.01.09 @ 5:07 pm

Schoey, as far as #1 seeds; if we beat UConn on Saturday, it may be hard to give them a #1 seed over Pitt since Pitt swept them. As I said in above post, this week will be real interesting.

Comment by w bill 03.01.09 @ 5:16 pm

Doubtful the Pirates can get er done against UL so we have to root for the neers. Meanwhile, there is no way PITT does not get a #1 seed if we take care of business this week. If the seeding goes as Lunardi projects in yesterday’s Bracketology, I like UL’s #2 seed chances of getting to the Final 4. Just imagine if the BE put 3 teams in the Final Four!

Comment by IronManEE68 03.01.09 @ 6:45 pm

its too bad, because the 4 best teams in college hoops are pitt, uconn, lvl and unc…..its gonna be a shame that 1 of the big east teams dont get a 1, but with pitt/uconn and the bet coming, someone is gonna have a tough time in the next 2 weeks…..

Comment by schoey 03.01.09 @ 7:33 pm

Two observations, having been there last night:

1) It really was never in doubt. I made a winning bet with my companion with 5 minutes left in the 1st half that Seton Hall would not make another 3 until it was well over (Pitt – 10) and won it. SHU was just plum tuckered out

2)Doesn’t it make you cringe when Blair leave his comfort zone, the block, to either hedge or pick? Always seems to be some sort of trouble when he does. He needs to stay put.

Comment by steve 03.01.09 @ 8:07 pm

for the people that watched it on tv.. .could you hear the Pitt fans ? Went to the game and their student section was terrible….at times 5 of us could out cheer their entire student section…

Comment by snala the panther 03.01.09 @ 8:37 pm

Seton Hall and St.Johns are two of the most storied programs in the B.East and it’s ashame that they are down as far as the are. What Colleges need are on campus facilities…Most students in urban area campuses dont drive. Even if they are bussed like what Pitt does for football this is still annoying for students to go through. So “SNALA THE PANTHER” yeah there arent any students there for one they arent good and for two the campus is some 15-20 mins away.

Comment by Nobody 03.01.09 @ 9:04 pm

The Big East in Basketball needs to spilt into two divisions like it was prior to the ACC raid on the conference…I also think that the Big East should’ve only took on Louisville, Cincy, and S. Florida because they also play football…I know it was an deal that included all but Depaul isnt doing anything and it’s in Chicago, the true midwest. S. Florida is too far away to have any true rivals in the conference hell the program for football is only what 12-13 yrs old? ANYWAY as it stands the DIVISIONS should be as followed….B.E. EAST—1.Uconn 2.Nova 3. G’Town 4.Providence 5.S.Hall 6.Rutgers 7.S.Florida 8.St.johns B.E. WEST—1.Pitt 2.Louisville 3.Marquett 4.DePaul 5.W.Virgina 6.Cincy 7.N.Dame 8.Syracuse…play each team in the divison twice and then 4 crossover games…the heck with this unbalanced schedule thing…teams beating up on each other for no reason…

Comment by BE_man 03.01.09 @ 9:14 pm

Was at the game as well. Thought the atmosphere was horrible for a college basketball game. Aside from one or two moments in the first half there was no energy in that building. Just makes me happy to know that we have a great team, great fans and a great venue.

Comment by TJ 03.01.09 @ 9:48 pm

Nobody, there were a lot of Seton Hall students at the game. They were sitting in the end zone and didn’t make much noise. To show some enthusiasum, they did stand up from time to time.

By comparison, the Zoo has prime seats and the students are enthusiastic.

Comment by BigGuy 03.01.09 @ 9:56 pm

I agree the Big East needs to go with 2 divisions. But I believe instead of trying to match up some geogrphic divisions, go with the 8 football teams in one division, and the 7 non-football schools and Notre Dame to make 8. Call them Big East Blue and Red divisions.
Also since the Big East has 16 teams and invites every team to its tournament, they should break it into 2 weekends with no byes. 1Blue plays 8Red and so on and so forth. Imagine playing a tournament that would imitate a region exactly. Thursday, Saturday back to back weekends. Of course logistics are difficult, but you know they can get the Garden.
I think the two divisions would work because the football schools would develop more intense rivalries. and the smaller basketball schools would have more level playing field being grouped together. When examined closely, the divisions are about even in overall strength. Both short term and potentially long term.

Comment by artgrz2000 03.01.09 @ 9:57 pm

Blair needs to hedge Steve, that is part of any good man to man defense team. Yes, its dangerous because they can draw fouls, but its a heck of a lot better than switching and drawing a huge mismatch, or leaving 3 point shooters without a hand in their face. Hedging is basic basketball for a man to man team. You play good tough defense, you risk fouls, but that is a trade you have to be willing to make.

Comment by Yinzer 03.01.09 @ 11:13 pm

Pitt has got to improve their press breaker. I believe the problems they are having with the press are due to their philosophy on how to break it. They are so used to walking the ball up the court the last few years and they seem to think they can go in slow motion trying to break full court pressure. Their is no movement at all from the off the ball guys and for years I cringe every time the inbounder throws the first pass to a teammate in the corner who has two guys ready to trap him. Not sure if its because Levance is not a speed burner, but we got to get someone who can attack a press at least a little. How about catching the ball on the move or better yet, get the ball inbounds quickly after a made basket. Its like we take our time to allow the other team to set up the press. For years Coach Dixon has had this philosophy and its really hurting us this year. Someone on that staff has to be able to come up with a way to relieve some of this pressure.

Comment by Z-boy 03.01.09 @ 11:47 pm

Dixon’s coaching style does not hurt this team nor does his philosophy in any way. The guy knows what he’s doing. Period. The fact of the matter is Pitt has lost 3 games, lets not freak out about the coaching or players.

Comment by Yinzer 03.02.09 @ 12:11 am

To get in on the conference makeup debate, my thoughts have been to run it like the NFL:
4 divisions. Play the 3 teams in your division 2 times (6 games). Play the other 8 teams once, alternating home and away each year (18 games total, like now). The #1 teams in each division get the double bye, the #2 teams the single bye. It makes each division important.

Comment by KeyboardKev 03.02.09 @ 7:40 am

Sorrry, math error above – play the other “12” teams once.

Comment by KeyboardKev 03.02.09 @ 7:41 am

Keyboard, What is your suggestion for the makeup of each division?

Comment by Tiger Paul 03.02.09 @ 8:01 am

I prefer the football (8) and non-football & ND (8) set-up. Note that DePaul was included for the Chicago exposure, while USF was included for football recruiting purpose.

An article in Post-Gazette addressed the turnover issue, and stated that it is a team problem — of the 41 TOs the past 2 games, 17 were from Blair & Youn, some of them being stripped after rebounds. The problem wasn’t necessarily breaking the press — below is an excerpt from P-G.

“We’ve got to be more active,” Jamie Dixon said. “We have to meet passes. We had 13 in the first half [against Seton Hall]. It’s not the press. It’s the frontcourt. We had no turnovers against the Providence press. It was all in the frontcourt again. We have to make better decisions in the frontcourt once we get across.”

Even when the Panthers weren’t turning it over after the press break, Seton Hall players were having success stripping the Panthers after rebounds and when they set up in the half-court offense

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 8:09 am

Sam Young carried that team Sat night. Offensively, he went back to what he does well — turning and facing the hoop and hitting mid-range jumpshots. He didn’t force a bunch of drives or take too many 3s. He found soft places in their D and exploited them. He also rebounded strongly, especially when Blair was out.

If Sam had even played an average game rather than a stellar game, that game would have been a lot closer than I’d like to consider…….and Seton Hall stinks.

Besides Young, the Panthers stars AND the Panthers supporting cast aren’t clicking right now. Besides the two late treys against UConn, Fields hasn’t played well on offense in quite a while and his defense has been awful and Blair’s coming off one lousy effort and one sub-par effort. Brown, Wanamaker and Dixon have all mixed a bunch of turnovers in and around anything positive they’ve done and Wanamaker has visibly struggled on defense.

Have to hope a little home cooking will rectify things, but these last couple outings were really uninspired.

I’ll be interested to see how JD handles McNeal and Matthews. Jermaine Dixon can only cover one of them at a time; guess he’ll get McNeal. Not sure who’s going to hang with Matthews, who is 6’5′” and strong. I know Fields has to be psyched that James won’t be there to hound him. It’s amazing how tough Marquette has played UConn and L-ville without him. They’re really scrappy.

Comment by hugh green 03.02.09 @ 9:05 am

Hugh, couldn’t agree more; Marquette cannot be overlooked, James or no James. I honestly believe this week is more important than next week, and if Pitt wins both then it would pretty much seal a #1 NCAA seed. And it will also give a gauge if Pitt is better able to handle pressure against athletics teams now that they are aware of how vulnerable they can be.

Not only can Marquette be a nuisance, as I posted earlier, UConn is the only team in the country that has yet to lose an away game … thus if Pitt gets any notion that since the won up there, it will be easier here, they may be in for a rude awakening.

March Madness is here!

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 9:56 am

Fields has not looked himself the last 4-5 games. He is passive on the perimeter. I know he is not a blazer, but, still, he used to reliably get to the rack a few times a game. In the last few, penetration has not even appeared to be a consideration in his mind. Penetration can open up lots of opportunities for easy hoops.

Same for Dixon. He is a really strong slasher but has not been doing enough of it. Would really like to see them focus on getting to the hoop against Marquette and, as we saw with Sam against SH, taking the good open mid-range shots instead of taking so many 3s.

Plainly put: this team is at its best when it moves the ball (and that includes against the press!) and gets to the hoop.

Comment by Carmen 03.02.09 @ 9:56 am

Marquette’s front court is smallish. If we dominate in the paint, we win going away.

Comment by steve 03.02.09 @ 10:22 am

The lack of penetration by Fields and Dixon may be atributed to the fact that Providence and Seton Hall played a lot of zone — which was the primary reason that Young always had an open look from the top of the key the other night.

Pitt does need to dominate on the boards, and to do so, they have to play a half-court tempo than to try to play uptempo.

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 10:39 am

Agree on Fields. All I can think of is that he’s just not as tough against zones. I think Marquette stays man 100% of the time, so that should be better for Fields’ game.

Pitt should dominate inside, but Louisville and Uconn also dominated inside and Marquette stayed close.

Comment by hugh green 03.02.09 @ 10:44 am

I’m wrong on Marquette — I think they’re playing some zone now with James out — not a good sign for Levance.

Comment by hugh green 03.02.09 @ 10:47 am

Agree on the zones being a factor, but even with a zone there are opportunities for a PG or SG to get into the paint. Hopefully we’ll see some of that. This is going to be a looooonnngg week.

Comment by Carmen 03.02.09 @ 10:54 am

TigerPaul, I was thinking geography and natural rivalries, with trying not to throw 4 historically weak programs into a division together. Also, 2 football/2 hoops only schools. So I would have (as a first pass):
– Pitt, WVU, Marquette, DePaul
– UConn, Syracuse, ND, St. John’s
– Louisville, Cincy, Seton Hall, Providence
– GTown, Nova, South Florida, Rutgers

Comment by KeyboardKev 03.02.09 @ 11:33 am

Maybe a silly question but why can the team handle Cuse’s zone but no one else’s?

Comment by CalvinHobbes 03.02.09 @ 12:24 pm

Cuse just lays back and plays a staright zone. Lville, Providence and S Hall presses and traps before settling into their defense whether it is zone or man-to-man,and it is the aggressive presses/traps that bother Pitt. Boeheim will never be confused as a master defensive coach.

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 1:15 pm

I also was at the game. There were lots of Pitt fans there. I’ve made my distaste for the Prudential Center known on the live blog posting. Game reminded me of the ol’ Duquense games at the Civic Arean – anyone old enough to recall those Sunday afternoon games? I agree with posters – the football & basketball teams could be in two different divisions. Since the BCS is dominating all facets of college sports do any of you really believe Providence, Seton Hall, St. John’s will ever return to their glory days? And DePaul – should never have been admitted at the expense of another football school. Guys – please keep in mind no one at the BE office is listening.

Comment by TonyinHouston 03.02.09 @ 1:40 pm

Maybe the BE office should have told Marquette they could be admitted to conference but they need to return to Division 1A football. Or maybe send the same message of Villanova? Both schools had competitive football programs not that long ago-in fact, Pitt played Marquette in fball in 1959. It seems like a hoops school should step up to be the ninth team in the football league. Don’t you guys agree?

Comment by TonyinHouston 03.02.09 @ 1:44 pm

also regarding an earlier comment… even if we win out .. we would need two losses from ville to be the big east reg season champs… since they have the tie breaker against us. (or am i missing something here?)

Comment by Snala the Panther 03.02.09 @ 1:53 pm

Actually, I believe if it is a 3 way tie for first, Pitt gets the #1 seed based on their 2-1 record against UConn and L’Ville. Of course, this assumes L’Ville loses one of their remaining games and Pitt wins out.

Just saw that Memphis jumped Pitt in the coaches’ poll.

Comment by Pantherman13 03.02.09 @ 1:59 pm

You people have lost total focus on what the Big East was all about. It was orginally set up in 1980 as a basketball conference that would attract the large east coast TV audience, and most of the original teams did not play D1 football — Nova, GTown, St John’s, Seton Hall, Providence and UConn. The only FB schools playing D1 fb was Syracuse, BC and Rutgers (which was debatable at that time.)

In fact, the BE wanted a PGH presence for the TV market and had to decide between Pitt and Duquesne in ’82. It should also be known that PSU had its application to join the BE before Pitt was accepted, but was rejected due to its lack of TV market and bb success. The BE didn’t turn into an FB conference until ’92, in which Miami and VA Tech joined and WVU came in a year or 2 later.

Lastly, DePaul was accepted into the BE for the same exact reason that Pitt was accepted — for the large TV market. (note that I may be a year off on the data I provided abve as to when teams joined.)

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 2:02 pm

What an absolute joke that Memphis jumps Pitt in the coaches poll. Conference USA garbage team. Good luck to Memphis with their horrendous shooting when they play in the tournament against real teams. They struggled against the BE in losing to both G-town and Syracuse which was at home. These aren’t the top teams in the BE by any means. I’m amazed at how dumb the voting coaches can be. I would love to see Calapari have to compete against real teams in a real conference once. But he never will. He is perfectly content in sitting in the A-10 or Conf-USA and not having to compete for recruits or against good coaches. He’ll play his 8 tough games before the conference starts and then get his conferences one bid. I’ve watched his team several times this year and they are not a good offensive team by any means.

Comment by Ralphy Willard 03.02.09 @ 2:24 pm

Well Memphis defintely would have many more then 3 loses if they were in the bigeast.. but come tourney time… they always do manage to perform. And inreality they could have won the National Championship last year,,, abiet choking hard.

But I think Pitt at number 3 makes sense right now. AP sometimes is hard to figure out what they are thinking….

Comment by Snala the Panther 03.02.09 @ 3:07 pm

AP has Pitt at #3; it’s ESPN poll that has Memphis at #3. Even more strange is that Memphis picked up 4 first place votes. Maybe there are some coaches who really do not want to see the Big East get two #1 seeds? I’ve only seen Memphis a couple times this year, and my general impression is that they are very athletic, but their offense is primarily a one-on-one isolation game. They do not seem to be nearly as well balanced as last year, and I find it hard to believe they are pulling down #1 votes. As I said, I haven’t seen many of their games, so consider the sample size before telling me I don’t know what I’m talking about.

Comment by Pantherman13 03.02.09 @ 4:03 pm

I believe the Espn poll includes one coach from each conference as well as media. It is possible that the 1 coach from Conf USA and media covering that conference voted for Memphis. Nonetheless, I don’t believe this poll has any affect on the NCAA seeding/selection as does it have on the BCS.

Comment by w bill 03.02.09 @ 4:16 pm

definitely agree on the post that march madness for pitt starts now…there are no more easy games, and we cannot have anymore lackluster performances…..fact remains, with the exception of the first round of the NCAA tourney (and that team will be a conference champion), there will be no more setons halls or depauls……

Comment by schoey 03.02.09 @ 4:17 pm

Just re-watched the SH game on SNY, but was there on Saturday. Prudential Center sucks. It’s a sterile hockey arena. Yes, reminds me of games at the Civic Arena before The Pete. And the PATH train sucks too.

Totally disagree on the some the above sentiment regarding Fields. He played well against Seton Hall. 10 assists on some really nice looks, plus a few that weren’t converted. People in our section were oohing and ahhing over his passing. He also penetrated well, drew some fouls late, and handled the press well. Plus he plays a very hounding defense. He’s not getting burned individually or anything like that. He just can’t make his technical foul shots. But he’s a great player and one of the most sound point guards in the country still.

They break the press better than before. There is no coaching issue there. It’s clear that this is something they’ve been working on. They use a standard spread out formation. There is not supposed to be a lot of movement from the off ball guys because that causes confusion from the part of the ball handler and doing that often draws defensive players in bunches toward the ball. They need to do a better job of protecting the ball, but not a lot of passes were thrown away as versus Louisville. Gilbert has issues on the press though.

Things are stacking up nicely for us now. Two competitive home games- one against the #1 team, our own senior night, then the BET at MSG (our home away from home), and hopefully a high seed in the Mid-West. Lots of great hoops ahead of us…

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 03.02.09 @ 4:40 pm

I’ve re-watched the SH game and I defy anybody to “ooh and ahh” over what anybody did besides Young last Sat night.

Guess we’re seeing something very different with Fields lately. Can’t imagine what it would be like to watch him hound anybody on defense, but I’d love to see it. He gets burned individually a couple times a game, which doesn’t bother me much because I know he’s not the quickest guy out there. I’m willing to accept that because he normally makes a big difference on the other end of the court — and I just haven’t seen that offense lately. We’ll need that difference-maker on Wed and Sat and there’s much more chance of seeing it against a man-to-man defense because Fields uses picks well and gets to the hoop way better than when he faces a zone.

My thinking on the press is pretty simple: you have to make the opponent pay for their press with easy buckets. If you’re only playing to break the press and then slow it down, then that pressure is eventually going to wear on you. I don’t mean that Pitt needs to turn these games into track meets, but they do have to attack pressure and look to score off it sometimes. Nothing discourages a press more than a couple dunks. The problem, though, is that Pitt doesn’t have a speedburner like a Lawson or a Sharaud Curry or a Kemba Walker to strike fear into anybody…..

Still would like Dixon to throw in a few press breaks involving hitting Fields in motion (as has been mentioned on this blog)……though he’s not a speed merchant, he’s still a great ballhandler and should be able to create a couple easy scoring opportunties, making it tougher for the presses to develop any momentum.

Comment by hugh green 03.02.09 @ 6:21 pm

Fields had 10 points and 10 assists, which means he was responsible for 1/3 of our points. He had assists in half-court rotation, dished out from penetration, and assisted in transition. Plus he ate up a lot of the clock in the second half with some fine ball handling. There’s no one else on the team capable of this type of contribution. He IS a difference maker for Pitt.

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 03.02.09 @ 7:11 pm

Pitt is 25-3. They are doing just fine. I’ll let the professionals decide how to play and attack the press. Meanwhile, Fields is, quite simply, a winner. Do you realize he has won over 90% of the games he has started. Additionally, him, Sam and Biggs are on there way to becoming the winningest class in Panther history.

Comment by Omar 03.02.09 @ 7:57 pm

Getting 10 assists against the second dumbest (1st is Syracuse) defensive team in the BE isn’t exactly noteworthy. All those guys do is gamble on the defensive end (and hoist up bad shots at the other end, but that’s another issue)…..

Absolutely correct — there is no one else on the team that can handle it, pass it, and penetrate like a PG should. That’s why seeing him play average ball is frustrating.

Fields is a winner. No doubt about it. He also can play a lot better.

Omar — you’re a great fan of the team, which is wonderful. If you don’t want to analyze and criticize constructively, that’s fine. Let the “professionals decide” and you’ll just worry about the W-L record at the end of the day.

That wouldn’t work for me. When you’ve spent (and am still spending) what seems like half your life on a hoop court, it’s impossible not to think about every decision you see coaches and players make. Could they have made a better decision? Why would Gilbert Brown be bringing the ball up against a press when he’s uncomfortable handling it in the halfcourt? Why would I keep Gibbs on the bench and stay with my normal substitution pattern when he’s the only zonebreaker I have?

This team just has me a little worried right now.

Comment by hugh green 03.03.09 @ 8:59 am

Ahh. Nice hedge. Yeah, it’s the dumb defense that accounted for the numbers now, not the guy himself. I get it.

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 03.03.09 @ 3:06 pm

Not hedging. Putting up numbers against bad opposition deserves praise? It’s like oohing and aahing when Kobe puts up 50 against the Knicks……

Comment by hugh green 03.03.09 @ 5:24 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter