masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
February 24, 2009

Lets not be the signature win that Providence can claim puts them back in the bubble discussion. Take care of business tonight.

UPDATE: Pitt is crapping the bed. Down 44-26 at the half.

Pitt came out slow, sluggish and sloppy. Then it looked like Pitt was putting it together, getting it to 29-25 with 6+ minutes until the half. Then Providence went on a 17-1 run to the half.

Look, Pitt is playing horrible. No question. 10 turnovers. Only 3 assists (Fields has 0). A few shots haven’t fallen.

On the flip side, credit should be given to the Friars. They have moved the ball really, really well. 13 assists to 3 turnovers. We knew they could score and they are.

Pitt also getting beaten on the boards — 19-14. Pitt only has 1 point on second chances. Providence has 8. Those are effort things, and Pitt isn’t giving the effort while Providence is.

FINAL UPDATE: Well that sucked. A 81-73 loss.

It was frustrating as there were points where it looked like Pitt was snapping out of it. About to really turn it on as the game started getting close. And then…

Well, we can expect plenty of stories on how Pitt lost because Blair was in foul trouble. It must be so since he fouled out of the game. No. Not this time. Blair spent most of the first half, playing half-assed. It was as if he expected Providence to give him the room.

Not that he was the only one. Pitt played a stand-around game. Poor ball movement to go with the sloppy ball-handling.

With the exception of Ashton Gibbs, guard play was a complete wreck. Providence was playing a 2-3 zone, which means the guards have to shoot and make plays. Wanamaker looked like he had never seen a zone. Fields and Dixon just seemed disinterested. And Gilbert Brown reverted back to enigma status. I was most frustrated by that aspect.

The officiating sucked. No question, but Pitt did plenty to themselves to lose.

Credit, though, also has to be given to Providence for playing a great game. They made their shots. They were much more active. They did their thing. Pitt didn’t.





Terrible game. Not much to discuss. Nasir Robinson and Gibbs should have played more in the first half. Fouls were irrelevant. First half turnovers were the key. Jermaine Dixon and Wannamaker were just out of sorts yesterday. They played terrible. I COMPLETELY disagree with Hugh’s take on his offensive game. He is much better at dribble penetration than his predecesors and can get to the rim and hits clutch shots. Penetrating against the zone is key. Yesterday, Dixon, Young and Wannamaker all had slippery hands and turned it over way too much. Don’t read too much into this loss. Win at Seton Hall and take care of business next week and things will be fine.

One thing I don’t understand is why is college basketball down this year? Because OJ Mayo and Micheal Beasly aren’t playing. News flash they didn’t to squat in the NCAA tournament or for their teams. UNC’s team is entirely back. UCONN has tremendous NBA talent as does Louisville. What is the rationale for saying college basketball is down? You have 4 teams with 3 losses or less. Same thing last year. It just doesn’t make a heck of a lot of sense. The mid-majors are down, but the rest of college basketball is about the same.

Comment by omar 02.25.09 @ 10:38 am

College hoops quality is terrible this year. Doesn’t take much comparison to figure it out.

Some random observations:

* Pac 10 is just plain lousy. Howland lost Love, Westbrook and Mbah a Moute and replaced them with freshmen who haven’t excelled, Wash St lost most of their team and Arizona State…….yes, you heard me right (Go Herbie!), might be the best the conference can offer. Ouch.

* Big 12 is way down. Beside OU, it’s a tough year out there. Look at what KU lost; they’ve got young talent but it’s way too soon for those kids and Missouri is just taking advantage of lousy competition. Texas, missing a PG, is also down this year.

* Big 10 stinks. Michigan St has nice athletes, plays D and rebounds…..but they can’t put the ball in the hoop regularly enough to scare anybody. Rest of the conf isn’t worth mentioning.

* Outside the major conferences, Memphis is usually a major threat, but they lost three NBA players (Rose, Dorsey, CDR) and those three guys could pick up a couple of bench players and dust this year’s starters.

* The BE and the ACC are good (not great, just good), as usual. Maybe 10 of the top 15 clubs come from these two conferences. Status quo: UNC has the most talent and is better than Duke, WF and Clemson while UConn, Pitt, and Louisville are fighting it out in the BE. Same as it ever was.

* It’s hard to even write about the SEC. This year’s UT team is way down, Fla is bad, Meeks is fun to watch but Kentucky is average. LSU is taking advantage of playing nobody every night.

* As you mentioned, there doesn’t seem to be a threat in the ranks of the mid majors. The media’s been looking for a squad to tout and usually the MVC or the Horizon has something, but all the Butlers, Creightons and Tulsas don’t look as good as they have in past years. Also, Gonzaga isn’t nearly as good as they should be.

All of which combines to tell me that college hoop is way down and Jamie Dixon has picked the right year to field his best squad. Better to be lucky sometimes, right?

Comment by hugh green 02.25.09 @ 11:23 am

Ritz,
Read my post. I stated that they were “reasonable” calls, perhaps inconsistent with other calls in the game but not phantom calls. Anytime a player doesn’t move his feet and reaches out while the opossing player is blwoing by him to the basket he is proabaly going to get called. It happens all the time. It isn’t a hard foul, but it is easy to call and is out in the open. If you are going to let him go by you, why reach out??

Comment by Tiger Paul 02.25.09 @ 11:48 am

Completely disagree with your assessment of the BE. Most teams returned almost everyone and already had talented casts of players. Explain how a team that has as much success as Notre Dame last year could fair so horribly in the BE this year. It is a great league and teams beat up on each other because there are many very talented teams. Having a dominated team or two doesn’t make a league not great. This Pitt team, with Blair, Young, and Fields is the most talented we have seen, by a long shot I believe, yet they have lost 3 times already, and once at Providence. The league is talented top to bottom and that makes it great. I would argue that Dixon is unlucky because he has his best team when a lot of the league is playing great basketball too.

Comment by Ritz 02.25.09 @ 12:02 pm

Those weren’t the fouls yesterday though…they weren’t reaches. One was a phantom over the back on a 5 foot some player who didn’t do anything to establish position. One was a phantom call when a player drove baseline and Blair simply let him go. The other I agree, was the hardest to see, and it was where Blair had position. Yes he reached down a little but it looked like nothing. That one maybe not phantom but very questionable. The other 2 yes, phantom.

Comment by Ritz 02.25.09 @ 12:05 pm

To Jimbo Covert’s Son… Thanks for the tip about the TV website. I’m glad however that I didn’t see the Providence fiasco. Hail To Pitt!

Comment by Vito, A&S '70 02.25.09 @ 12:06 pm

On the downside, the game was over at the half, and it was over because a Pitt team did something that I have not seen a Pitt team do in the Howland/Dixon era….they quit. The last nine or so points of the first half for Providence were uncontested shots. Every Pitt player and the coaches just looked like deer in the headlights. It truly was a horrible half. On the plus side, the team fought hard in the second half and scored 48 points. The real story of the game is not the refs or any of Pitts play, its about Providence, their game plan, and their near flawless execution of that plan in both halves (33 points in the paint in the first half!). They did not just beat us, they smacked us around. The team’s pride, and coach Dixon’s pride, should be wounded.

Comment by HbgFrank 02.25.09 @ 12:33 pm

everything ive read is true, but at the end of the day its one loss and one loss only…we’ll see how we rebound from this loss on saturday, and hope this doesnt happen again in march….

Comment by schoey 02.25.09 @ 12:49 pm

Everyone needs to chill out. The worst thing that was lost from this game was the number one seed in March. Oh boy…then we are a number two seed. Not much of a difference in the long run. If you are going to go all the way in March, you are eventually going to face the Duke’s, UNC’s, and UCONN’s of the world. There is no ducking it.

And now we come to the Big East Tourney. I would love for us to win it, but we might be better off if we get knocked out early so we can rest for March which is what really matters.

This is why college football can’t change its current format. Every game means something. The game against PC tonight means little in the grand scheme of things and the Big East Tourney doesn’t mean much either. It’s all about what happens at the end…. so before anyone wants to throw a 20 plus win team under the bus for having one lousy performance, it isn’t that big of a deal now. If it was next month at this time, it is the end of the world.

Let’s not make mountains out of mole hills.

Comment by AJ 02.25.09 @ 12:50 pm

I’ll be at the Seton Hall game and I hope we take it out on them and ruin their senior night. I’ve oficially moved on now to the next challenge.

Hail to Pitt

Comment by Tiger Paul 02.25.09 @ 1:04 pm

Ritz……Big East didn’t return everybody by a long shot. Who do you think Pitino would rather have in the post — senior Padgett or freshman Samuels? How about Marquette? Think they’d rather play with some size inside (Barro, Burke) or just play small ball?

Notre Dame stinks this year because Harangody puts up 30 shots a game, everybody’s figured out how to guard McAlarney, Tory Jackson’s game has gone backward and they miss that Kurz kid, who was nice to have around the boards.

And I didn’t even bring up G-town, which is the best example of a team way downhill from last year. They’re bad. I actually feel sorry for Monroe because Sapp, Summers and Wright can’t shoot fish in a barrel.

Comment by hugh green 02.25.09 @ 1:54 pm

Yes, people magically figured Notre Dame out when they had all last year to do so. I doubt it. The league is just better. Also, I don’t think Marquette would rather play with size…is this years Golden Eagles better than last years larger version? Yes, so I’m pretty sure there happy with how its going. Remember Villanova’s small ball team that had success a few years ago in the tournament, size doesn’t dictate success. Yes, I’ll give you Padgett is a big loss, but Samuels is probably more talented, and every other player has an extra year under their belt of experience to make up for it. G-town is far worse. UCONN is no doubt improved, Pitt is no doubt improved, Nova is no doubt improved, Syracuse is improved (despite losing Green, this is a much better squad, Onuaku is far improved, and Devendork and Ruatins are back). Yes Gtown is far worse, but beyond that its a pretty darn strong league.

Comment by Ritz 02.25.09 @ 3:21 pm

ND stands for No Defense, and I would put Bray on notice if I were his AD. Don’t underestimate the SEC and overestimate the Big 12 — note that Arkansas beat both Oklahoma and Texas; Arkansas currently sits at bottom of SEC with a 1 and 11 record. I agree that Memphis, UNC and possibky Xavier will be biggest non-BE threats but Izzo often has Mich St prepared for NCAA … plus whoever is this year’s version of Davidson

Comment by w bill 02.25.09 @ 3:54 pm

Never said the BE wasn’t strong, just said it’s good the same way it always is and not great like the analysts proclaimed before anybody played any games. It’s probably marginally better than last year, but nothing to write home about. Some teams are up, some are down.

You’re missing my point on Marquette. Buzz would take some size right now if he could get it. Doesn’t mean he has to change style of play, just means he’d like to have some options.

My point was that the BE and the ACC are steady and everybody else is down. It’s hard to argue with that given the state of play and the hemorrhaging of good players outside those two conferences.

A great year for Dixon to put his best squad on the floor. There’s always going to be BE and ACC comp in the tournament, but this year the other competition doesn’t look nearly as formidable.

Comment by hugh green 02.25.09 @ 5:23 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter