masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
January 31, 2009

It wasn’t a hard halftime adjustment. Frankly, it’s been the successful game plan for most teams facing Notre Dame, as I noted yesterday.

The scouting report is simple. You stay one-on-one with Harangody — he’s going to get his double-double — but completely shadow Kyle McAlarney. Keep him from getting free and dare anyone else on Notre Dame to beat you.

I was simply shocked that Coach Dixon avoided that as a gameplan in the first place. I suppose it was out of fear that DeJuan Blair would get in foul trouble, but doubling down on Luke Harangody is a recipe for disaster. Pitt did stay tight on Kyle McAlarney, but they kept leaving Notre Dame open and Luke Zeller and Ryan Ayers made Pitt pay.

The difference in the second half was stark. Notre Dame had no open threes without a double on Harangody. You can argue that the first half game plan put Harangody in a bad place mentally, but he scored 19 on 9-15 shooting in the second half, so not really. Harangody scored more than half the 35 points ND had in that half. Why? Because ND had no space on the perimeter. They only attempted 5 threes in the second half.

ND has no defense, and Pitt killed them with it. So, let’s temper the enthusiasm with the offense. It looked great, but ND tends to make most offenses look pretty good.

Other Notes: A smart use of timeouts in the second half by Dixon to rest Fields and Blair. He called a TO with 13 minutes left. Took out Blair and Fields, with Pitt leading by ten. Pitt’s offense went into slowdown mode, but efficient. In fact, the back-ups did real well with their assignments. They kept things moving and the media timeout didn’t happen until 10:22 rather than the 12 minute mark. With the media break, they got a good 5 minute rest halfway through the second half.

Blair really enjoys going against other top bigmen. One part is competition. The other, is that they get to bang and no cheap fouls.  Harangody may have outscored Blair 27-23, but no one who watched the game thinks that Harangody got the better of Blair. Blair had 22 rebounds and completely frustrated Harangody.

I like Len Elmore as a color analyst, but for god’s sakes man, Jermaine Dixon is a starter not a bench player.

On the subject of Jermaine Dixon. He just seems to get better the deeper into games. More in the flow, and feeling the game more. He has a different enthusiasm for the game than Blair. It’s more intensity and passion than smiling and joy of the game, but it is no less infectious.

Ashton Gibbs enjoys his open looks, and would like to play a team like ND that allows that many more often.

Sam Young is definitely still in a slump. One good half against WV has not changed it. He’s struggling with his shot and seems unsure when he should be attacking. Too often in the first half, he is settling for jumpers, then trying to overcompensate in the second half.





Regarding Young’s slump…my recollection may not be accurate, but didn’t he go through a mid-season slump last season, only to rebound during the BE Tournament? If so, I just wonder if his slump is more mental right now? Anyone care to comment?

Comment by Colt Convert 01.31.09 @ 3:34 pm

As always Chas great analysis….my daughter is 28 now but I remember those days with family like they were yesterday. Glad you could recover and watch…

Comment by dan 72 01.31.09 @ 3:44 pm

We showed we can win without Young. The next hurdle is winning without Blair.

Comment by steve 01.31.09 @ 4:27 pm

Rather than looking at the final score, you can pretty much tell if Pitt won or lost by looking at Blair’s points and minutes.

Comment by Joey D 01.31.09 @ 4:40 pm

Colt Convert on Young’s slump. Nice recall.

link to scores.espn.go.com

A 3-3 stretch for Pitt from Jan 14-Feb.2 saw Young go 38-100. The difference, was that he was still getting to the free throw line (almost 6 FGA/G) which meant he was still averaging over 17 PPG (103 points in the stretch).

This is roughly a 7-game stretch where he has again scored 103 points (or 14.7 ppg) on 39-101. The difference is that Young is shooting a lot less free throws — 3 FTA/G.

This is indicating that Young is doing more jump shooting rather than attacking the basket and drawing the contact.

Comment by Chas 01.31.09 @ 5:00 pm

good comment Chaz about ND (basketball’s version of the Big 12 South) can make any offense look good. Pitt can shoot, but can they make them down the stretch when they aren’t worn out from playing against a good pressing team? So far, no … but still have time to work on that, and Sam has to getback into the swing of things.

I assume that the recruit next to Wanny was Josh Evans, 4-star, and the exposure he received certainly couldn’t have hurt …. almost seemed to be an illegal recruiting stunt. For those who attended, was there any interaction between Evans and the Zoo?

Comment by w bill 01.31.09 @ 5:04 pm

anyone know what other recruits were at the game? That was a great Pitt victory – they kept battling in the first half despite all of the ND 3-pointers – many teams wouls have rolled over then. Gibbs has a great looking shot – anyone who is hitting over 60% ON 3-POINTERS needs to shoot more of them! I still worry that we get away form penetrating with our guards and forwards and sometimes spend too much time shooting from the outside. We needed to take the ball to the hoop more in the first half. Great win!

Comment by Dishman 01.31.09 @ 5:23 pm

Gibbs is a slightly better version of Ramon. He’s an absolute sharpshooter but he’s a liability with the ball and he can’t make his own shots. Ramon overcame most of that by his senior year, but I’m certainly nervous whenever I see Gibbs running the offense.

On a side note:
link to postgazette.com

Comment by matt 01.31.09 @ 8:13 pm

Sam just never seems to get comfort in the game. He seems to be trying too hard instead of just letting the game come to him. The pressure of impressing the scouts at the next level might be what’s taking him out of his game. I attended a few games early this season, and Sam seemed to be pressing from the get go. Hopefully, he just continues to play team ball, and his natural ability will eventually take over. Right now, he continues to hustle, and a subpar Sam Young is still better than most players in the BE.

Comment by ltl 01.31.09 @ 8:21 pm

Gibbs is not a slightly better version of Ramon, he is a much better player. The difference is Gibbs can already create his own shot. See the drive an pull-up in the first half. The kid is going to be player. He isn’t a true point guard, but the kid can flat out score.

Comment by omar 01.31.09 @ 9:34 pm

Matt,
Going to have to disagree with you. He doesn’t really make me as nervous running the O as a freshman. He isn’t going to be a Fields at this point, but is doing a hell of a job for a freshman. He looks to be a steal of a recruit. As Omar said, he did create his own shot twice in the first half. It’s a ridiculous comparison and is only made because both are good shooters. Gibbs also looks to be a longer player which naturally makes him a better defender, esp. with more atheleticism than Ramon. No knock on Ramon, I loved him and how he played, but I don’t think these 2 are similar players.

Comment by Willy Ralphard 01.31.09 @ 9:56 pm

I was rather impressed with the half time adjustments and second half play. And it’s nice to know we can win with Young being in a major slump, but we’re definitely going to need him down the stretch.

Comment by Dugdog 02.01.09 @ 4:24 am

I haven’t been paying close attention to whether Young is playing at the 3 or 4 mostly during this recent slump. My recolection is that he has struggled at the 3 in the past, and has done most of his damage at the 4. Last year, he primarily played at the 4, and he seems to be back at the 3 this year with Biggs starting and getting more minutes. Is this what is hurting Youngs game? Would a better starting line up be Young back at the 4, and Gil at the 3 with Biggs the 6th man? I know that would probably hurt us on the boards a bit, but its worth talking about

Comment by Scott 02.01.09 @ 7:42 am

To me, it looks like Young has lost interest – he’s watching more thanplaying.

Comment by markp 02.01.09 @ 8:14 am

I think that Young has to let the gamecome to him instead of forcing. He seems to take a lot of poor percentage shots or force drives too early in the shot clock.

FYI — Pgh Post-Gazette is reporting that Walt Harris is a finalist for the Seneca Valley High School head coaching job. (4A school just north of PGH)

Comment by w bill 02.01.09 @ 8:30 am

Gibbs was a top-20 player during his sophmore and junior year of high school. Scouts knew this kid could play. His athleticism and length is what sets him apart from Ramon. He’ll never be a defensive stopper, but he also won’t be a liability out there. The kid can play and can score a variety of ways. He will be a stud by his senior year.

Comment by Omar 02.01.09 @ 10:59 am

[…] to start the conversation. If they’re terrible, you can commiserate as a way to build rapport. When I was an undergrad at the University of Pittsburgh, our football team was…how should I say…not good. So, when I would run into Pitt alumni, I […]


Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter