Okay, perhaps more like venting. Whatever, it’s good for the soul to get this out of my system before 2009 gets underway.
First, congrats to the Oregon State Beavers. They did just enough on offense, and persevered even when some key plays and calls didn’t go their way. It may have been an ugly 3-0 win, but it was still a win. As a Pitt fan, I’m not exactly going to blast them for not having the style points. Nor am I going to go to the “they got lucky” bit. They didn’t. They made more plays on offense, and left at least 6 points on the field in two drives that failed deep. Pitt’s offense, by contrast was never in a spot where you can that they were going to come away with anything, but for a little bad luck, a call going against them or just a great effort by the opposing player to stop them.
Pop quiz. A day or two before the bowl game and a member of the starting O-line goes down. In such a situation, do you lean heavier on the stud running back that has shown he can make things happen with just the barest openings on the line, and sometimes even with less than that? Or do you come out firing deep with a QB that at his best this season was adequate and before the bowl game the head coach admits he doesn’t know where the QB is mentally?
I don’t think it is any exaggeration, that whatever goodwill OC Matt Cavanaugh had built up in the course of the season after another rough start, has been shot, stabbed, beaten with a meat tenderizer, kicked around the blocks with steel toe boots and just otherwise left bleeding and pulpy somewhere deep in South Oakland.
Apparently giving OC Matt Cavanaugh more than a couple weeks to gameplan is not a good thing. I mean it was just stupifying. You can justify one, two or even three series in the first half to take a shot deep. To try and open things up and give the QB some confidence. But at some point, there has to be a realization that he doesn’t have it. That if they are going to stick with Stull, they can’t put him in the position to have to make plays. Let alone plays that he rarely made most of the season. The lack of throwing in the 7-15 yard range with Stull was stupifying.
As ticked as I am at Stull’s performance, I am far more disturbed and bothered by the playcalling. It was a lot like the Cinci game, where the playcalling took LeSean McCoy out of the game even more than the opposing defense.
Fans never forgave Walt Harris for many things. One of which was in the Meineke Bowl (or whatever they called it in 2002), trying to get too cute on offense and forgetting the most important weapon — Larry Fitzgerald. At least Pitt moved the ball and occasionally scored in that bowl.
In the first quarter, McCoy touched the ball 3 times — 2 rushes and 1 pass. McCoy ran the ball a total of 8 times in the first half. Stull was 5-14 with an interception and a sack in that half.
In the second half, McCoy got 16 touches, but 5 of them came in the second last series after Stull was pulled due to injury. Meaning, everyone knew and the Beavers were not even bothering to worry about covering the receivers.
We can blame Stull for not making passes anywhere near the receivers. For locking in on his target at the line of scrimmage. But, put the blame on the guy making the decision to keep doing it when it was obvious and apparent very early that it wasn’t going to work.
Oregon State was without their best player and best offensive weapon in RB Jacquizz Rodgers. To say nothing of WR James Rodgers. Yet, they still did enough without the two players that accounted for 21 of the Beavers 46 TDs and over 2500 yards. I don’t even want to imagine what Pitt’s offense would have looked like without McCoy.
Pitt’s defense kept it so close that you could believe that one break. Be it a pick six, breaking off a punt return, or a picked up fumble could be the difference. The sad thing was that all of those scenarios were dependent on doing it without having to turn things over to the offense.
The defense held Oregon State to under 300 yards and created 3 turnovers. Pitt couldn’t get 200 yards in the game.
I am completely disgusted and my four year disgust with Dave the incompetent is at an amazingly high new level.
We are Pitt…being satisfied with being 9-4 doesnt cut it.
Also, I don’t want to get flamed for being negative, since there was plenty of positive stuff in the game, specifically on D, and moving into the offseason.
-The D-line’s improvement continues.
-Berry may have had some time for introspection in the last month. Either way, I think the light went on for him in the same manner that it did for Revis before his Junior year, and to a lesser extent Josh Lay before his Senior year. Look for Berry to have an outstanding year next season.
-The defense began creating more turnovers by the end of the year, as promised by Coach Bennett.
-While we do not have the depth of a USC or Florida, we were able to preserve the redshirts of some vital components of last year’s class.
-This year’s class in looking to be shaping up nicely and I think we will finish strong with 4 or 5 more commits.
HTP!
P.S. Cav has to go too. I could go on for another hour about the horrid play calling, but I’ll save that for another time.
I love this program, but Stull is a selfish, lazy player, and he does NOT deserve a scholarship. For that matter, he doen’t deserve a punt pass and kick trophy. Wanny had a major brain fart the day he recruited this worthless waste of space. I don’t know or care how much the players like Cav, the guy is as good an OC as Stull is a QB. Oregon put up almost 70 POINTS on this defense. Thank God Stull gave away the Cincy game, because this team would have been embarrassed by just about every other BSC team (OK, not VT). One more thing, can we please stop talking about how “tough” Stull is? He is about a tough as a throw pillow. I hope Stull is reading this, but I doubt it because
A) No player in their right mind would visit this blog after a loss:)
B) He probably doen’t give a shit that he sucks anyway. Stull’s probably happy to take his hair-dryer and leave. Thanks for the scholarship, suckers!
Other players have had bad games, but this is the first time that I honestly feel one of our players didn’t care if we won or lost. The effort just is not there from Stull. If were working hard and TRYING to get better, he would not be getting WORSE. This selfish, lazy, shameless young “man” makes me sick to my stomach.
We have every reason to believe that next year will be a good year, too.
I’m sober – I might not be in an hour. So long as I am, though, I can sincerely wish each of you a Happy New Year – let’s keep this blog clean (a fun place to visit).
Can we raise a toast to Chas there fellas (and gals)?
My sincere thanks for your dedication & interest to this site — has it really been 5+ years?
Hail to Pitt
However, as I walked back to the kitchen to get myself another beverage, I happened to glance at my calender and realized how long the coaching staff had to put this ‘winning’ game plan together. They had 25 days. Thats over 3 weeks to game plan.
And what a game plan Cav came up with! The play calling was typical Cavanaugh… Start off with a couple bubble screens to the recievers to loosen up the defense, then hit them with McCoy with dive plays and a couple counters, throwing only when we have to and those passes will only be screens or hook patterns unless a long yardage situation was encountered. And there is nothing wrong with that game plan if it is working. That is a textbook game plan for ball and clock control. However, if its not working it is the football equivalent to banging your head against a wall.
However, after 3 and out after 3 and out, no changes were made. Especially in the second half, Pitt just kept running the same old 7th grade football plays, hoping against hope that McCoy would eventually break one. And Oregon State just lined up with as many players in the box that they could fit, knowing Bill Stull wasn’t going to throw anywhere near a reciever. Through all of that offensive failure Cav just kept on calling one bland play after the next, like Kevin Bacon at the end of Animal House, screaming “All is well” in the face of the melee.
Didn’t we have any play action passes in the game plan? How about any play in the Wildcat formation that didn’t involve Shady trying to run directly over the center? In a time when literally nothing that Pitt was trying to run was working, where was Greg Cross? Where was a trick play? We were only down 3 points, why not try something, anything for God’s sake? Why did Stull, just keep throwing fade patterns out of bounds barely in the same vicinity as an overmatched Baldwin?
The Pitt offense today was utterly ineffective and relentlessly stubborn. Cav refused to alter his gameplan and wasted away any chances that we had with idiotic play calls. I realize that Oregon State played well enough to win the game and should have won that game, their defensive line dominated the game and their linebackers plugged the holes superbly. Their offense moved the ball on us at times and should have scored more points. But Cavanaugh and the Pitt offense should have put up even a little bit of a fight. He squandered away the best defensive performance of the year.
The person who I feel worst for however is Scott McKillop who absolutely played like a champion today. Hopefully he gets drafted by a team with an offensive coordinator.
Happy New Year
Clearly, Pitt may be better served by not fielding a quarterback at all.
With our struggles on the offensive line, I believe we need someone who can evade the rush and give our quality wide receivers a chance to get open.
Also, the current bowl system is a mess. Four weeks off is just enough time to develop some rust. A playoff could have been decided in that time.
Finally, McCoy should touch the ball 30 times a game. He’s the best player on the field for Pitt and he gives us the best chance to win.
Good analysis.
A few additional thoughts:
1. We never rolled our QB out, since the only passes working seemed to be “north-south” passes, due to the wind (How many times did they tell us about the wind…it was discussed more than the game itself). Rolling out Stull would have given him time ( i hope) to look vertically downfield…and hopefully set and then throw, “north-south”.
2. I kept waiting for playaction on first downs, and throws over the middle to TEs, or quick slant-ins to our WRs. And am still waiting.
3. I do believe our OL struggle was a bigger problem than the wind…but give credit to the OSU DLine–they came to play.
4. The only problem I had with going for the first down on fourth down, is we didn’t set it up on third down….it’s as if we weren’t thinking ahead.
5. The most exciting plays were the OSU punts…their punter kept launching long kicks…and Porter did a good job returning them (and at least he had the presence to fumble out of bounds and pick up a few more yards), and came close to breaking one all the way.
6. D-Line was terrific!
7. My OSU friends were pretty good about the game…one started dozing off in the third quarter, and the others just thought it was an overall bad game. They were happy to win…just not excited, and were pretty much on mute the whole day…as opposed to the Duck fans who went crazy when they beat another OSU in yesterday’s Holiday Bowl (exciting and wildly offensive game, especially in the second half).
8. Where was Cross at all in this game..with his speed, and as I noted above, the roll-out would have been nice to see.
9. Cav, I thought during the year (other than the BG fiasco) called plays built for the strength of our players…today, I don’t know what he was thinking…everybody has a brain freeze…maybe he had too much ice cream…but doubtful if Wanny pulls the plug on him, as they seem to be connected to the same scheme, albeit way too much.
I am still pleased with a 9-4 season..though not happy with the first game or last game play…but I like to think this is but the first step to a return to glory!
Hail to PITT!..and Happy New Year to PITT fans around the world!
-al-
Stull rolling out is hilarious because he can’t progress to the second receiver. Slight pressure and he falls apart. He looks for the most part what a bad HS QB looks like. I have had a hard time watching them this year even when they won because they have QB who is inept.
If he starts next year I just don’t know if I will watch them. I could not bring myself to watch a QB who just goes through the motions and does not have one iota of playmaking ability. Freakin dead weight for sure and that is why I beleive this team was good.
Seriously.
Beaver fan here, just to tell you in case you didn’t know…
Stull suuuucks.
Your O-cord is quite possibly the worst I’ve ever seen.
Whine-stedt exceeded my lowest expectations.
I honestly pitt-y you guys.
I especially feel that, again, this outcome rests on the shoulders of two people – Cavanaugh first and foremost – and Bill Stull.
It was painfully obvious that Bill Stull just couldn’t get it done early on, and yet Cav refused to either acknowledge that, or held out hope we could get one big play. Either way the OC refused to see what was painfully obvious to the rest of America (at least those interested) and that was the QB was not able to function.
All year long I’ve tried to be a realistic as possible in following this team. I don’t get too excited after the wins and I refused to get too upset over the losses – and I’m not pulling my hair out over this either. But I’ve also felt that, as poorly as Bill Stull has played all season – and it wasn’t all like yesterday – he still gave the PITT offense the best chance to move the ball and score points. That said, I was crying for Cav & DW to start Bostick in the second half as it was just too apparent Stull couldn’t make it work.
The best, absolute best, I can say about Stull’s performance yesterday was that he didn’t throw any pick 6s. But, I still would have taken the chance that Bostick might do that for the trade off that we’d somehow finally get in FG range.
As to the cry for firings. We’re crazy if we call for DW’s head over this. We just finished a 9-4 season, on the heels of a 5-7 season the year prior. No, DW’s done a good job in my book.
However, we’ve seen as much as we can from Matt Cavanaugh. If we can’t depend on someone to be willing to 1) acknowledge the obvious and 2) have the guts to act on what the obvious has presented him with, then that person is of no positive use to the team.
We’ve done well this season – but it’s plain to see that we have enough of a quality base that we can afford to stretch in other areas – take some risks to shake things up.
A new OC and honestly evaluating the QB position has to be the first step.
I hope that’s the New Years Eve booze talking, because it’s pretty sad to think that an adult would take the opportunity to be as insulting as you are, just because of a lost football game, when they are sober.
1929 Jock Sutherland loss to USC 47-14
1955 John Micheloson loss to Georgia Tech
21-14
1973 Johnny majors loss to Arizona State 28-7
1987 Mike Gottfried loss to Texas 32-27
1997 Walt Harris loss to Southern Miss 41-7
2008 Dave Wannstedt loss to Oregon State 3-0
We are consistent.
Happy New Year and at least you didn’t invest with Madoff.
PS: I think we could hire a child that is good at Madden to call a better game than Cav.
“I’ll need some time to think about that,” Wannstedt said. “We need to improve at a lot of positions, and we’ve got to play better at the quarterback spot, no question.”
The above was copied from today’s Trib. I’m not sure how to interpret McKillop’s and Shady’s laughs … either that they know Cav will stay with Stull no matter what, or every knows that Timo is the best QB in the program (I guess ths is more speculative hope than anything else.)
As I had indicated in previous posts, it pains me to think that the 09 team which has a good chance of being the best Pitt team since the early 80s will suffer because its QB cannot make a play and the OC cannot adapt to anything but a straight drop-back QB approach anyone for Kyle Boller or Trent Dilfer?) At least Dilfer had an overpowering O-line; Pitt does not.
You can sit and rail about Stull being bad…he is. But Bostick always looks like a deer in headlights.
Lastly, this goes on the coaches. Not particularly for the play-calling (which was bad), but for their adamant refusal to get Greg Cross involved earlier in the year. By not using him, the team was forced to rely on to completely incompetent quarterbacks. In the Sun Bowl, they couldn’t rely on him because they never gave him a shot.
Go get em, Pete Carrol, destroy those hicks.
Stull is horrible. Unfortunately, I still think he is the best we have. Isn’t that pathetic? What I want to know is why we insist on having him throw the ball deep down the sidelines. Our line was horrible and he didn’t get adequate protection. He can’t make the big throws when he isn’t under pressure. Do we have a 3-step package? Where are quick slants and outs? And where was the screen package yesterday? Just an embarrassing game offensively. It is so frustrating b/c the offense has talented players who don’t touch the ball.
Also, can we just put Dickerson at WR? He made two beautiful grabs on our last possession. I’ll take that over Turner and Porter dropping balls all over the field any day.
Hopefully this embarrassing performance serves to motivate this team in the off-season and spring ball b/c they are talented and can play much better.
What I am specifically referring to is the style of QB play. In the last 4 years, PSU had two BCS bowl teams when using a mobile, option-type QB (Robinson and Clark; but hen they had the strong-armed, pro-style Morelli (Cav’s wetdeam), they were just an above-avrage team.
Unless you have an overpowering defense AND a dominant O-line, you will run into some games when you need your QB to make a play; not one that just succumbs to pressure but actually can improvise. (Robinson & Clark vs Morelli & Stull.)
I have no problem with the loss – you win bowl games, and you lose them. I also have no problem with the way anyone played. Players have good and bad days, and some have more ability than others. My problem is the way the coaching staff keeps letting the team down, especially in key game situations.
Three of Pitt’s four losses this year are on the staff, as well as several from last year. Several of our wins were IN SPITE of the coaching staff. Not good when you have good athletes playing their hearts out, only to lose because of poor game coaching. And I’m not talking about reasonable calls that just didn’t work. I’m talking about calls that anyone with the slightest knowledge of the game would know are bad calls (I know most of thats on Cav, but Wannys the HC. He could change it). These men have devoted their lives to the game. I would expect more from them.
I’ve heard plenty of Zeise this year, telling me that Wanny has a “philosophy” that “is not going to change”. Believe me, I understand that. But that has never been the issue. Good coaches will make adjustments to that philosophy for personnel and situation. Wanny does not. He almost seems content to lose games rather than try something different when the game plan isn’t working.
Not that the game plan is ever that spectacular. With a Heisman Trophy caliber running back in the backfield, how many times did they throw long on 3rd and short? Or throw the fade X and goal from the two? Or, in general, not put the game in the hands of the guy who got them there? How do you game plan for the run when you admit the week before the game the only chance your opponent has is to throw?
When it was clear at halftime of the Sun Bowl that Stull didn’t have it, why didn’t Bostick, or Cross, or ANYONE start the 2nd half? When it was clear Stull wasn’t going to hit the deep ball, where were the short routes? Why, on the last two drives, when a field goal could have sent the game into overtime, did Pitt leave 3 timeouts on the board?
This hasn’t happened in just one or two games. Its been happening for at least two years. When you lose after putting forth your best effort, that’s just the game. You got beat. When you lose because the coaches didn’t put forth their best effort, or freeze in game situations, its disheartening.
Sure, I’m thankful to be 9-4 with a bowl game. Its part of the progression, from bad team, to…to what? Elite status? Maybe. But if Pitt ever gets there, we will then be complaining about the lost opportunities. The missed major bowl, or possibly the lost national championship. There will always be those 1 or 2 losses a year that fall directly on the coaching staff. Unless Wanny learns. So far, he’s shown no inclination to learn.
(By the way, I still say ‘What IF?’ What if we had gone back to Script before the game? ITS A JOKE! Fer chrissakes.)
Take personal shots at the coaches if you want, they get paid well. Stop throwing the insults at Stull. Yeah he is not a good qb, but he’s a kid. Hail2Pitt, have you ever competed in anything in your life? Fat asses who sit on their coaches everyday who have never done anything competitive in their lives are usually the first to throw those kind of personal insults around. Yeah he had a bad day and is not a great qb, lets keep it at that.
As for him being the best QB they have. If I have to hear that excuse one more time I will vomit all over my computer screen. PAT BOSTICK IS BETTER THAN BILL STULL. He came in yesterday and completed 2 big passes over the middle that without doubt Stull would have overthrown. Lets take a look at Stulls stats from his first full season compared to those of Bostick a year ago.
NAME CMP ATT YDS CMP% YDS/A TD INT RAT
Pat Bostick 155 252 1500 61.5 5.95 8 13 111.7
NAME CMP ATT YDS CMP% YDS/A TD INT RAT
Bill Stull 181 306 2304 59.2 7.53 9 9 126.2
Keep in mind that was a true freshman thrown on to the field with a horrible line and no options at receiver.
I’m really not sure how anyone can defend this kid anymore. The fact is he can’t play football. Give me Pat Bostick.
Good job to the D. They made the plays when they were needed and have improved through the season.
Hail to Pitt! Happy New Year.
I went to Pitt in the 70’s and have been a follower ever since. Lived through Foge, Hackett, and Harris debachles. This is worse. Like an earlier poster said, Pitt only got 9 wins because of the Big Least.
I am in business and I can tell you that the problem here is Wannstedt. The players, and the assistant coaches, do what the head coach directs. He needs to move into some kind of an ambassador role where he can still help recruit ( like Johnny Majors did when he realized he didn’t have it anymore)but he needs to stay home on Saturdays. He won’t, of course, and that is why people like me will remain casual fans and not buy season tickets of travel to Bowl games. I know that is not what people want to hear, but I know I speak for most followers who desparately want Pitt to be a major program but won’t be with bad head coaches. Bring Skip Holtz in and I stand in line to buy season tickets and donate the the Panther club, but invest in this charade-fughedaboudit.
1) This was the single worst offensive performance that I have ever seen at any level of football.
2) It is evident that Cav has no confidence in Stull completing quick slants or crossing patterns over the middle – he simply doesn’t call these plays, relying instead on trying to get lucky on a deep fade when we only need 5 – 6 yards for a 1st down.
3) Given this, it is inexcusable that a competent 2nd option at QB wasn’t developed during the season – Bostick, Cross, Sunseri, whoever. This failure falls squarely on Cav and Wanny. How can you continue to play a guy that you have no confidence in?
4) As bad as Stull played, our offensive tackles played worse. Clowser was so overmatched that he couldn’t even get in the way of his guy. Yet, he played the entire game.
I have no confidence that Wanny and Cav will open up the QB position during Spring camp or become more creative in play calling. Unfortunately, I think we are in for a repeat performance next year.
Hail to Pitt!
I watched the Oregon, OSU game to see how Ore. got 60. Their QB is a 5’10 sparkplug that reminds me of Grothe. S. Fla. and WVU would have beat Ore. St. by 4 touchdowns.
To Stull’s credit, he took blame for the offense’s ineptitude and said he felt bad for letting his teammates down. He said what made accepting his performance harder was that his grandfather had died last week and he had dedicated the game to him.
“Things just didn’t click, but I blame myself for playing [so poorly],” Stull said.
“This is the worst game I ever played in my life. It is just horrible, I feel sorry that my teammates had to be a part of the way I played and I feel so sorry for the seniors.
“[The wind] didn’t affect anything, I just played horribly. This is definitely not how I wanted to play for my grandpa and everything, it is just horrible.”
Wannstedt on the 58 yard FG:
“I think it summed it up when it was fourth-and-8 and I had more confidence kicking a 58-yard field goal than going for it.
“I did feel like Conor could make it, I did not feel like our offense could, and when you are 2 of 15 on third down, I felt like I needed to give our team the best chance to win.”
Your comments are right on target. Why do some incompetent people get promoted? They demonstrate qualities their bosses want to see. They are often very hard workers, say the right things, and are loyal to a fault. Wanny rewards such players with playing time, and will overlook almost anything they do on the field. The great bosses, and coaches, are more ruthless. Wanny is truly a nice guy – which is terrific for recruiting, but maybe not so good when a player is not cutting it. I think Pitt will continue to have reasonably good seasons, but championships and top-ten rankings are probably unrealistic given the circumstances.
DW’s toughest three hours each week are those during the game. ADJUSTMENTS are something he and his staff are just incapable of perhaps because they assume it will always go their way? He never has plan B or C. Football games are like wars and business today….they never go the way they are planned. A good coach, like a good business manager today has to be sharp, accountable and make adjustments on the fly.
With Wanny and Co….it has always been his biggest problem (See Miami and Chicago blogs during his tenure there). Start off w. the BG game and their adustment not to line up and play
smash mouth football in the second Q. Game over.
The moment I heard Pinkston was out, I knew we were in trouble. DW is a great guy, recruiter and rep. of UPitt but until someone teaches him to make a plan and have effective alternatives….the “what if” scenerio…he will never improve as a coach. Ditto’s Cav. Think about it….no single active coach is constantly thought to be more ineffective and stupid on game day than Wanny….It’s planning for the unexpected that does him in year in and out.
One last comment….could not agree more on Lundquist and Co. yesterday …the worst announcing I have ever heard.
who can blame him????
he should go, we will only hold him back and ruin him……
Let me answer that. Stull played the entire game and was 7-24 with a fumble and a pick in Oregon St. territory.
Bostick actually moved the ball downfield with a minute to go, getting more yards than Stull did all damn game. Sure he took two sacks. But he also hasn’t played all season other than the ND game (which he won), so it isn’t like our starting QB, the one who has all the experience and the reps took those sacks. It was a backup thrown in to rescue the team with 54 seconds to go in the game. The other 59 minutes it was Stull pissing away opportunity after opportunity.
Does that answer the question?
Wanny really needs to look long and hard at Cav in the off-season and quickly too! Despite Stull’s poor performance and missing a key OL, to not have a better shot at scoring other than one attempt at a FG and at 58Yds too, is an absolute disgrace!
Great win against Georgetown!!!
Hail to Pitt.
BOO CBS…you can do better than that!!!!