Okay, perhaps more like venting. Whatever, it’s good for the soul to get this out of my system before 2009 gets underway.
First, congrats to the Oregon State Beavers. They did just enough on offense, and persevered even when some key plays and calls didn’t go their way. It may have been an ugly 3-0 win, but it was still a win. As a Pitt fan, I’m not exactly going to blast them for not having the style points. Nor am I going to go to the “they got lucky” bit. They didn’t. They made more plays on offense, and left at least 6 points on the field in two drives that failed deep. Pitt’s offense, by contrast was never in a spot where you can that they were going to come away with anything, but for a little bad luck, a call going against them or just a great effort by the opposing player to stop them.
Pop quiz. A day or two before the bowl game and a member of the starting O-line goes down. In such a situation, do you lean heavier on the stud running back that has shown he can make things happen with just the barest openings on the line, and sometimes even with less than that? Or do you come out firing deep with a QB that at his best this season was adequate and before the bowl game the head coach admits he doesn’t know where the QB is mentally?
I don’t think it is any exaggeration, that whatever goodwill OC Matt Cavanaugh had built up in the course of the season after another rough start, has been shot, stabbed, beaten with a meat tenderizer, kicked around the blocks with steel toe boots and just otherwise left bleeding and pulpy somewhere deep in South Oakland.
Apparently giving OC Matt Cavanaugh more than a couple weeks to gameplan is not a good thing. I mean it was just stupifying. You can justify one, two or even three series in the first half to take a shot deep. To try and open things up and give the QB some confidence. But at some point, there has to be a realization that he doesn’t have it. That if they are going to stick with Stull, they can’t put him in the position to have to make plays. Let alone plays that he rarely made most of the season. The lack of throwing in the 7-15 yard range with Stull was stupifying.
As ticked as I am at Stull’s performance, I am far more disturbed and bothered by the playcalling. It was a lot like the Cinci game, where the playcalling took LeSean McCoy out of the game even more than the opposing defense.
Fans never forgave Walt Harris for many things. One of which was in the Meineke Bowl (or whatever they called it in 2002), trying to get too cute on offense and forgetting the most important weapon — Larry Fitzgerald. At least Pitt moved the ball and occasionally scored in that bowl.
In the first quarter, McCoy touched the ball 3 times — 2 rushes and 1 pass. McCoy ran the ball a total of 8 times in the first half. Stull was 5-14 with an interception and a sack in that half.
In the second half, McCoy got 16 touches, but 5 of them came in the second last series after Stull was pulled due to injury. Meaning, everyone knew and the Beavers were not even bothering to worry about covering the receivers.
We can blame Stull for not making passes anywhere near the receivers. For locking in on his target at the line of scrimmage. But, put the blame on the guy making the decision to keep doing it when it was obvious and apparent very early that it wasn’t going to work.
Oregon State was without their best player and best offensive weapon in RB Jacquizz Rodgers. To say nothing of WR James Rodgers. Yet, they still did enough without the two players that accounted for 21 of the Beavers 46 TDs and over 2500 yards. I don’t even want to imagine what Pitt’s offense would have looked like without McCoy.
Pitt’s defense kept it so close that you could believe that one break. Be it a pick six, breaking off a punt return, or a picked up fumble could be the difference. The sad thing was that all of those scenarios were dependent on doing it without having to turn things over to the offense.
The defense held Oregon State to under 300 yards and created 3 turnovers. Pitt couldn’t get 200 yards in the game.