masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
October 13, 2008

B. DeCicco Does the Expected

Filed under: Football,Recruiting — Chas @ 9:17 am

Brock DeCicco has long been thought to be Pitt’s recruit to lose. The Tight End is the brother of Pitt safety Dom DeCicco. Pitt has been recruiting him for some time. He has been a regular visitor to the Pitt facilities and practices. He decided during Pitt’s bye weekend to make it known.

“Pitt is moving forward and I want to be a part of it all,” said DeCicco, who is 6 feet 5, 225 pounds. “It is as simple as that.”

It apparently caught Coach Wannstedt by surprise.

“When I told Coach Wannstedt,” DeCicco said, “he said, ‘You caught me off guard. I didn’t see that coming at all.'”

Really? You’ve been recruiting his family for three years, essentially. Pitt is coming off a major win. The major competition was Wisconsin, who has now lost 3 straight including being absolutely blown out at home. And he didn’t see it coming?

The only thing less believable than that will be if Brock says something to the effect of, “The coaches indicated I’ll have an excellent shot at playing as a freshman.” With Dickerson and Byham both being seniors next year, DeCicco is the closest thing to a lock to redshirt among the recruits.

DeCicco is a 3- to 4-star recruit. The redshirt year will probably be a necessity according to the ESPN.com/Scouts, Inc. evaluation.

Should develop into a strong blocker with additional bulk. DeCicco needs to hit a college weight program, but he’s a good player who should become a well-rounded college tight end.

Being able to block, of course, is the first thing Wannstedt and Cavanaugh look for.





Hope B. DeCicco fares better than what his brother has done so far. But the up side is he’s only a sophmore with great size and abilities. Hope his brother is like that too?

Comment by Lou 10.13.08 @ 10:22 am

I think Dom will be fine- it’s not like he’s playing poorly. He’s a redshirt freshman who now has a grand total of 5 college games under his belt- and he made a nice pick last week. If he completely flatlines and is playing on the same level at this point next year, then it might be fair to criticize.

Great news getting his brother- I guess I didn’t think it was the lock a lot of other people thought it would be.

Also in recruiting news, WVU’s big QB recruit has de-committed. He was the #3 multi-purpose QB in the country. Looks like WVU might be joining Rutgers on the recruit de-commit wagon.

Comment by Dan35 10.13.08 @ 1:24 pm

I would hate to see the Big East start tanking in the next few years…but its not like the schools were recruiting great before…they just have done more with less talent.
i.e. UCONN, USF, Cincy, Rutgers

Comment by DW4Prez 10.13.08 @ 10:11 pm

Chas, you’re kind of taking pot shots at DW any chance you get. It was pretty easy to infer from that quote that DeCicco took Wannstedt by surprise by committing at that day’s practice – not that he committed at all.

Comment by Reed 10.14.08 @ 4:39 am

Ditto Reed. Chas needs a pad. The constant moaning about the coaches, Wanny especially, is starting to get old on this site. Pony up the $1K, buy http://www.firedavewannstedt.com, and move the Blather there.

Comment by LGP 10.14.08 @ 7:49 am

And a lot of you have lost anything resembling a sense of humor over Wannstedt. Choosing instead to parse that for anti-Wannstedt bias.

I found it silly for many of the reasons I listed. Is it out of context, second-hand or a perfectly rational reason for what he said? Sure.

Is there anything in the article to explain it, though? No. So why not have a little fun with it? Oh, because it isn’t what you want to read.

Comment by Chas 10.14.08 @ 8:54 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter