masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
July 28, 2008

It’s not expansion per se, but a kind of interesting plan/negotiations that makes some sense. Army and Navy wouldn’t actually join the Big East, but they would each play 4 games each year against Big East teams.

For example, in a given year, Army would play Connecticut, Cincinnati, Louisville and Pittsburgh. Navy would face Rutgers, South Florida, Syracuse and West Virginia.

So far the service academies have said no, but it strikes me as in the early negotiations. Working out the money and how the schedule would work.

It preserves Army and Navy’s independence. Gives them both two solid home games each year. Gives both sides some more set games and less travel issues with the geographic proximity.

It’s not a long term fix — the conference splitting is the ultimate end point — but it could be a good way to lessen the number of 1-AA games and ease scheduling issues.





Both those teams suck (well, Navy was good for a short time under Paul Johnson but look for that to revert back to normal soon). How does the Big East benefit from this? Scheduling cannot be that much of an issue, especially with smaller conferences. We already play MAC teams, might as well play Conference USA teams as well if an opponent is needed that bad.
Why the Big East would want to lock themselves into any contract with those schools is mind boggling.

Comment by Roman 07.28.08 @ 12:37 pm

I like both Navy and Army as non-con games, provided: (1) We never schedule the Youngstown States of the world again, and (2) At least 2 of the 3 remaining non-con games are against BCS opponents.

Comment by HbgFrank 07.28.08 @ 1:01 pm

I’ve always favored playing the service academies.
They’re both east coast schools; they’re both old eastern independents (like Pitt, WVU, ‘Cuse, Rutgers, and the traitor BC, and of course PSU and ND), and Pitt has played both many times (particularly Navy); it beats the hell out of playing 1-AA schools.

Plus, provided we DON’T play them on Wednesday nights, having the cadets’ and midshipmen student bodies in town is a draw for fans – and we need all the draws we can get.

Comment by Patrick 07.28.08 @ 2:49 pm

If you are upset that Pitt schedules Furman, Youngstown St, or Grambling, why are you any happier with Army or Navy? I agree they would draw to Heinz Field but Pitt could go out and get other BCS conference teams if they agreed to Home/Home series. Playing the service acadamies is equivalent to a 1-AA team b/c if you win you are supposed to and if you lose it is a disaster. Scheduling Michigan St. the past two years and now Iowa are great non-con games. Pitt should look for mid to lower level BCS teams to fill their non-con schedule each year.

Comment by Roman 07.28.08 @ 3:46 pm

If it draws people to Heinz, then I think it is a good idea. Maybe we could eliminate playing any 1-AA teams if Steve aggressively pursued some more BCS teams.

Comment by James 07.28.08 @ 4:29 pm

this is a great idea…as long as pitt continues to schedule AT LEAST 2 bcs non-conference games every season.

Comment by dithridge 07.28.08 @ 5:17 pm

You guys are nuts…this is a great deal, Pitt will actually get to play division I teams from now on instead of those lower tier DI-A or DII schools. Besides it’s Army and Navy schools with history, something the Big East is lacking.

Hey Roman, before you say how much Navy sucks, they beat us last year at our home. As for tailgating in upstate NY and in Annapolis, MD are truly fun tailgates, and only a day or 1/2 day drive away…so I say welcome to the Big East Army & Navy!

Comment by Marco 07.28.08 @ 5:24 pm

Love the idea of Army or Navy on the Schedule every year.

Comment by ChrisA 07.28.08 @ 7:57 pm

I am fine with Army and Navy. Those can be good games to build some story out of. We need to create some drama, like WVU last season. You can’t build off Bowling Green or Buffalo, nor would I want to. Iowa is good, let’s keep that game rolling :).

We should play some lower tier Florida schools(C.Fla or FIU) for recruiting if we have an open date. East Carolina or Maryland are good options as well.

Comment by Panthoor 07.28.08 @ 10:15 pm

For the record, the Big East is saying that the it isn’t happening.

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/bigeast/0-0-21/Big-East-has-no-plans-to-add-Army–Navy.html

I don’t think the matter is dead. In fact, the story seems leaked as a way to measure reaction to the possibility.

Comment by Chas 07.28.08 @ 10:37 pm

Why would Navy agree to this???? This would making it to a bowl game that much harder.

Comment by joel 07.29.08 @ 11:26 am

youngstown state travels well, is local, has a nice program. I know Nebraska travels well, and is willing to play about anywhere, what about Miami, weren’t they coming back on the schedule?
I like Army & Navy, we alway used to play them. at least, as mentioned above, we have a tradition with the service schools.

Comment by Kurt 07.29.08 @ 12:41 pm

doesn’t a win over Div 1 Army or Navy give you a bowl eligible win vs a win vs 1-AA team which doesn’t?

Comment by square44 07.30.08 @ 12:39 am

[…] reports that the Big East may be trying to work a deal with Army and Navy. Um, not so much. Mike Tranghese dispelled the recent New York Post story on the Big East looking […]


Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter