Damn. Damn. Damn. Damn.
Here’s the Cliff’s notes summary of what happened in that second half/final 12 minutes.
- Notre Dame was 2-12 on 3s in the first half, and 6-12 in the second.
- Pitt 5-13 on 3s in the first, 2-12 in the second.
- Pitt let up on defense to allow ND to really get out in transition to allow quick scores
- Free throw differential — specifically Harangody 7-8 vs. Blair 2-7
- Tory frickin’ Jackson.
- Guard scoring. Pitt got 17 points in the first half from Benjamin, Fields and Wanamaker; 9 points in the second half
- ND guards had 11 in the first and 28 in the second half.
- 2nd chance points — ND 17, Pitt 9
Now to the notes.
1st half
Early in the game, Rob Kurz had 7 of the first 11 points for ND. Sam Young didn’t exactly come out fired up to play defense.
An excellent job by Pitt to keep Notre Dame from getting out on transition. To the Irish’s credit, they showed a fair amount of patience and moving the ball around to get a good shot. Especially working it inside.
ND’s 3s not falling in the first half, but they were good about attacking the basket. Or at least Tory Jackson was.
DeJuan Blair will probably be the biggest beneficiary of Levance Fields getting healthy. It’s been a struggle to get the ball to Blair with consistency since Fields went down. There are already glimpses as the ball is coming inside to him better — on the money and less fumbling for it.
Fields looked a little bit sharper than in the Marquette game — thankfully. Still has some rust, but showing a little more confidence.
The missed 3s by ND in the first half were huge. eFG% by Pitt was 50% while ND was only 38.2%.
2nd half
Early in the second half: “Ramon can’t buy a bucket, but McAlarney struggling cancels it out — for now.”
At about the 13:50 mark: “Pitt goes up by 11, but slips on defense allowing ND one of their few quick scores out of transition”
When Blair missed those two free throws at the 11:40 mark, Pitt gave up another quick score and promptly turned the ball over and ND capitalized. That sequence made it a 4 point game and brought the crowd back into it. It had the effect home court should have. The Irish picked up their intensity on both ends.
Even then, Pitt still was in the game. But then McAlarney and ND hit their groove on the 3s when they nailed 4 of 5 in a 3 minute stretch to tie and take the game away from Pitt. Pitt turned the ball over on back to back possessions — on the ND end.
Even as Pitt might have had a chance to keep it from getting away, Pitt blew the opportunity. Blair made a great rebound and fed a wide open Young who just plain blew a wide open dunk that would have brought the game back to within 3. Instead ND got it and scored again. That blown dunk will haunt Pitt fans for a while.
It is worth noting that Harangody — despite being a beast inside — is a hell of a whiner when he doesn’t get a call. His own coach had to yell at him as he came within a hair of being T’d up for what he was saying to the ref.
Also give him some credit – he was being mugged, particularly on defensive boards and narry a call, while getting no-contact calls against him [see his first foul on Blair in the second half].
Blair’s tough for a freshman, but how is he supposed to battle whole front lines inside all by himself? (Dixon’s recruiting led to a situation where the poor guy is alone in there.)
When you combine a small, thin front line with an adequate backcourt you don’t exactly have a recipe for BE success. (when I say adequate I mean a decent PG in Fields and very average players like Ramon and Benjamin playing alongside him.)
they’ve been surviving because they play systematically and don’t make that many stupid mistakes…..but this team just doesn’t have the bodies inside this year to play that way.
Young 36, and not much good defensively
Ramon 32, and not much good offensively
Brown 30, but where was he in the 2nd half?
Fields 25, and he doesn’t have the stamina back yet
And the lack of depth comes in where:
Biggs 11 completely useless minutes
McGhee only 2
Wanamaker only 5
Until we start playing D again, this team is going to be awful. I really thought after that EMBARASSMENT at MU they were going to pick it up and show they have some pride. I guess not.
Well, they’ve finally done it. I’m not very hopeful at all for the rest of the season, cause we have a headcase on our team, and a few other kids that aren’t playing D. If its due to injuries or inexperience is neither here nor there. They’re awful on D, we’re gonna keep losing until they fix it. I think Dixon should spend every minute of every practice for the rest of the year on defense. 70 points should get us a win EVERY TIME on the road.
That, and stupid ass turnovers. Start benching kids who are giving the other team the game. I don’t care how many points they score in between dumb turnovers. And blown dunks, easily blocked shots when taking it 3 on 1, and shit passes out of bounds are turnovers….
I would love to see a rematch on a neutral floor.
It seems that this team lacks the killer instinct it had before the injuries. I can remember several games where other teams made runs at us and Fields would calmly come in and make a basket or get a steal for an easy 2. Now if a team makes a run to get within a couple baskets or tie, we crumble. There is still plenty of games left so I’m not throwing in the towel. Especially with how much better Levance looked last night. We need to regroup for the big game on Sunday. I’m confident Pitt will.
Finally, Dixon did not coach his best game last night. Calling our second to last timeout with 10 minutes left really hurt us when ND made the run to take the lead. I also thought he sat Benjamin too long in the second half. A player like him can go on a 15 point run by himself. No reason to rest him when he is killing it like he was. He is so streaky being on the bench kills his momentum. I thought Blair sat a little too much during the last 10 minutes as well. Dixon is a great coach and I’m sure we won’t see the timeout debacle again. The substitutions, I’m not so sure about. I think we’ll have to live with that for a few more years.
Ramon and Biggs played terrible as well. Ramon especially. No offense and left McAlarney free for a couple easy threes on defense. I know some of those shots were deep, but Ramon is a senior and knows ND likes to chuck it from anywhere on the court. He should never have left him open, even from 25 feet. Ramon is smarter than that. He couldn’t get anything down on the other end either. 0-8 with no points from a starter playing 30 minutes isn’t going to get it done.
Does that mean Dixon needs to go? Of course not. Can we count on him not to hold Pitt’s feet to the fire should another offer come his way? Don’t be foolish. People have long memories and remember having to stave off other programs trying to cherry-pick Howland and Dixon. The logic behind the Miller push is that he’s a “Pitt guy” and won’t be looking to climb the ladder. Take that for what you will. I’ll be honest, though. The thought of going after Miller has crossed my mind.
BTW – I saw only a snippet of the St. Anthony’s game last night during which Woodall threw the ball away on one end and then played some matador defense at the other end. Also, I understand that St. Anthony’s is an excellent program. But Woodall isn’t even starting. Does that have anybody else worried?
If we don’t get our heads our of our collective @$$ we could potentially (read: long shot) find ourselves on the outside looking in. Time to buckle down and knuckle up.
Conversely, we’re only 3.5 games out of first place. What a wacky year. I don’t think we play very consistently but I will admit that the BE is absolutely brutal this year. Quality teams from top to bottom. You simply cannot lose focus in this league or you will suffer as Pitt has.
I just feel Sean Miller would bring back the intensity of the teams we saw with Howland, and I don’t think it’d take very long for him to land some top notch recruits. I am from the area he grew up, his dad is a legend around me for his HS coaching. Not only was he an awesome coach, but somehow awesome players always ended up in our backyard. I’d be willing to guess that good recruiting runs in the family.
Team has a problem with leadership right now….hopefully Fields can fill that holecause Ramon and Young are not getting it done. Your main guy can’t miss a dunk like that…ok if a freshman makes that mistake but not your main guy. Not having an experienced player like Cook right now is really hurting.
As Ian mentioned above, it takes time to put together a championship team … You people are acting like its as easy as snapping your fingers … It took Boeheim 27 years as a head coach to win a title and he’s considered one of the best coaches of our era
Chris – regarding your comment about Sean Miller and his dad recruiting … I grew up around that area too and the reason Blackhawk got the best talent is because he was the only high school coach that actually recruited his players … He didn’t have any recruiting competition … I’ll admit that he was a good coach but going out and recruiting kids to play on a high school basketball team is ridiculous
You’ll note that I said “read: long shot” about missing the BE tourney. But it is possible and every one of the teams remaining on our schedule is talented enough to beat us. Whether Providence or St. John’s wins out is another story.
But, hey, if you think the only reason we lost last night was because Young, a senior, missed a dunk you’re right — we do need to get real 😉
As for Omar’s athleticism argument — I don’t agree. I do believe our players are getting more athletic — and that’s a good thing. I don’t agree that they’re necessarily better basketball players as a result.
Are we more athletic than ND as a team? Yes. Did we win? No.
Also, I want to state for the record that I’m not asking the administration to look elsewhere for a coach. That’s silly. I only stated that Miller – the dreaded “Pitt guy” — is doing a heck of a job at Xavier and it’s unlikely that Dixon will finish up his career at Pitt. You’re kidding yourself if you think he doesn’t want to go back out west at some point.
As to this being the most “athletically” talented team Pitt has had in the Howland/Dixon era — again — I won’t argue that. But this isn’t the most skilled or focused team by far. In fact, this is probably the most inconsistent, fundamentally challenged Pitt team I’ve seen in the past seven years. Injuries and youth obviously contribute to that. But you’re not judged on potential. You’re judged on results.
As for results, most posters complain about the team not taking a step past the Howland teams. Well they can’t do that in February, they can only do that in March. I’ll trade some growing pains now with Fields back in the line-up, for an in shape and confident Levance come the stretch run in 3 weeks. Educated fans should have expected a bit of an adjustment when Fields returned and I think that is what we have seen.
The fact is this teams ceiling is much, much higher with Levance getting back in the groove. It would have been nice to play better the last couple games. Hopefully Pitt can get the home win they sorely need on Sunday. If not, then there are several games after that. My point is that fans should not throw in the towel just yet. This team has great coaching, athletes and talent. They just need to play with all of the pieces for more than a week or two.
1) failure to get big time recruits. He is give the excuse the All-Americans want to go to places with proven coaches who send plers to the NBA. I say look at Bruce Pearl of Tennessee. Not only does Tenn. not have the same caliber program as Pitt, but what has pearl ever done. He coached at UW- Milwaukee.
2) Since Howland left, the defense has regressed every year.
3) Poor game management. last night as an example – Poor use of time outs, leaving himself with only one time out for the final 10 minutes. He substitutions are the same every game. He does not take into consideration of who’s hot. he makes the same subs at the same time every game.
Pitt reached when they hired him, I think he interviewed for the Chicago state job the same year and did not get it.
It’s well within the realm of possibility, and 10-8 would be outstanding considering what people were saying once Fields went down. Come on, the only bad loss is the Rutgers game – I agree the defensive effort has been very disappointing, but I’m shooting for 10-8.
Not to pin it on one guy, but I can’t stomach watching Young fly by shooters and not even think about boxing out 9 times out of 10. Is he more talented than most recent players? Absolutely. He’s not making them better right now, though.
(On the other hand, watching Blair and thinking about his potential makes me borderline giddy when I think back to Gray’s painful performances during the final month or two of last year…)
Next years class are all 3* if I remember correctly. After the job Dixon did with A. Grey you would think a high profile center couldn’t wait to join Jamie.
All teams go thru ups and downs during a season.
Then you press…see home run pass to no one…missed dunk…pass to no one etc.
I still believe this Pitt team is special. Blair may turn out to be one of the best players in Pitt history, Young is an emotional stud, agreed on Wannemaker’s good future etc. Hindsight in coaching is 50-50 and I bet you asked Dixon today about benching Benjamin (think his hand is finally healed!), he would tell you he didn;t even notice it, and would not do it again.
Lots of cause for all of us to worry, including the coaches. I will tell you the Duke game and the Georgetown games were NOT flukes…and this is a very young team. We are capable of beating anyone in the USA on a good day.
Fields is the key…we all have to admit that for about 25 minutes, he looked very good and we looked like a top ten team.
If we can just slow down Louisville’s guards, we have a shot.
Let’s all calm down and root hard…locking the scotch away Sunday…Pitt 72 – Louisville 55
Not that I want Walt Harris back by any means but just food for thought.
That said, I concur with the post lamenting that our defense has gotten markedly worse in the last 2 years. Until then, our greatest shortcomings were a lack of a quality 3 pt shooter and the Dwayne Wade type “take over” player. But at least we knew we could count on the team to play lock down D and fanatical rebounding. After the injuries this year I stated in a post here we would need to keep each team at or under 60 to win. The team was woefully not lived up to that commitmeent to D in most of the subsequent games and have gotten embarrassed on the boards at times (letting that 5′ 7″ kid get ANY rebounds last night was a disgrace). D and Rebounding are much more about effort than talent. We seem to be lacking the effort in many parts of games…specifically, the most important parts!
But overall I still maintain this is a transition year, nothing much was expected at the start, and if it weren’t for 2 very narrow wins (Wash and Duke) and the (now obvious a fluke) Georgetown game, I think we’d all be pretty happy right now with our record. I (still) am.
tory jackson is actually 5’10” and a pretty solid rebounder, averaging over 5 a game. but i agree, our defense and rebounding is not where it was, or needs to be
Overall, he’s had an awful year. Regressed back to his freshman year. Not what we need from a senior…
ltl you are an ASS. Your opinions are baseless, that is why I don’t respect them. You are a critic, that’s it. You don’t like Dixon and you really don’t like Pitt. Don’t attack me because I’m not constantly calling out 18 year old kids and a gentleman like Jamie Dixon. If that makes you feel good, then continue doing it. Sometimes it’s okay to state an opinion is stupid.
ltl your opinion is stupid!
Is it that Pitt sucks? Is that Dixon sucks? Is it the players that suck? Maybe the Petersen Events Center sucks? Tell me ltl, what else sucks?
We are currently in the midst of the golden age of Pitt basketball, in case you missed it. We’ve never been this successful before, and may never be again. Pitt’s been to the NCAA’s six times in a row! I remember back in the dark ages (before Howland/Dixon) when getting to the tourney was mostly just a dream. So please enjoy it while you can if you really are a Pitt fan.
Also, it is quite alright to critique Dixon for specific plays or moves he did or didn’t make, but you’ve got to keep the big picture in mind. This year has been dramatically altered by injuries, and without those, we’d probably be fighting for a one seed in the tourney. Dixon is a great coach and maybe will go down as the best one Pitt’s ever had.
One or two years, i wasn’t sold on Dixon. But 5 fluke years? Cmon, moron. One of the fastest coaches ever to 100 wins, IN THE BIG EAST? I’ll “settle” for this poor coaching the next 100 years…
Go look at history, go look at ALL the coaches you consider great, and tell us all how many years it took each and every one of them to make it to a final four, and how many years for each to win a NC.
I understand Dixon doesn’t have a final four or national championship. But what he has done this early in his career is comparable or ahead of what they did. What Dixon has accomplished in a few short years has been to establish himself as a coach that almost every school in the country would love to have on the sidelines. There are coaches in place at many schools (Duke, UNC, etc) that will be there until they decide to retire. But if any of those coaches retired this year, I guarantee that Dixon would be one of the first coaches on the list to replace them.
I thought hiring Jamie Dixon was the wrong guy to hire when he was picked. I was disappointed that Pitt didn’t spend more time searching for a real coach and that they settled for Dixon. He has more than changed my mind these last 5 seasons. But lets run him out of town. That is what we do in Pittsburgh. As soon as a coach has a down season (not that Pitt is going to even be close to a losing season or anything), we demand that they are fired. With that kind of attitude, see how many high profile coaches want to come here and deal with that crap when they can be basically godlike at other schools for the same success Dixon is having now.