So anyways, family was in town over the weekend to keep me away from the computer.

Pitt has a new Linebackers Coach and I’m guessing the guy who will be doing recruiting in Florida: Joe Tumpkin.

Tumpkin also coached the linebackers while with the Mustangs (2005-07), serving under then-SMU head coach Phil Bennett, who is now Pitt’s defensive coordinator.

“The addition of Joe to our coaching staff fills three important needs for us,” Wannstedt said. “Number one, Joe is a seasoned linebacker coach. Secondly, he has worked extensively with special teams. Finally, as a Miami native, he is very familiar with the state of Florida and has recruited there the last several years. We’re excited about him joining us.”

Tumpkin, like the now departed, Aubrey Hill, also received a minority NFL fellowship. Tumpkin spent his last summer with the Tampa Bay Bucs.

Apparently Rivals.com — despite putting Pitt at #28 in the national recruiting rankings, which is actually a place higher than right after signing day — likes Pitt’s recruiters. Greg Gattuso was named Big East recruiter of the year and Matt Cavanaugh made the list of top Big East recruiters.

Rivals.com highlighted an assistant coach for their recruiting prowess from seven conferences, including each of the six BCS leagues. Gattuso was lauded by the website for “(pulling) off a huge upset when he reeled in cousins Cameron Saddler and Shayne Hale from Gateway.”

Gattuso “was a huge part of Pitt’s success in Western Pennsylvania,” Rivals added, also mentioning his role in helping to recruit quarterback Tino Sunseri (Central Catholic), linebacker Manny Williams (Clairton), defensive back Antwuan Reed (Greater Johnstown) and tight end Mike Cruz (Bishop McCort).

…

Rivals also lauded Pitt offensive coordinator Matt Cavanaugh on its Big East Top 10 Recruiters list, crediting him with helping the Panthers attract standout wide receivers Jonathan Baldwin (Aliquippa) and Mike Shanahan (Norwin) as well as running back Chris Burns (Wilmington Area).

Rivals.com also produced a Big East signing day dream team (only HS players). Pitt had the most players on the roster with 5: Jared Holley, Shayne Hale, Lucas Nix, Jonathan Baldwin and Cameron Saddler. Louisville and ‘Cuse placed 4 each, WVU and Rutgers with 3 a piece, Cinci and UConn 2 each and USF with 1.

Marcel Pestano — who it was already known that he was leaving Pitt — and Greg Webster have transferred to D-II California (PA) University.

Phil Bennett made SI.com’s Stuart Mandel’s list of impact coordinators hired.

The recently deposed SMU coach made a name for himself under Bill Snyder at Kansas State, where his defenses ranked in the top five nationally all three seasons (1999-2001). At Pittsburgh, he inherits another that ranked fifth in the country last season, trailing only Ohio State, USC, LSU and Virginia Tech.

Led by star LB Scott McKillop, the Panthers return 18 of 22 players on the defensive two-deep that bottled up West Virginia in their memorable season-ending upset. That defense is a major reason many prognosticators (myself included) expect Pitt to make the leap from 5-7 to top-25 contender next season, but it will require a successful transition from Paul Rhoads (now at Auburn) to Bennett.

He, who I would rather not mention, was not on the list.

I think sometimes we — as fans — get so wrapped up in what is or has happened in just a few day period that we lose sight of the full season. Expectations are fluid things. Going into the season, it was unsure. Pitt was ranked, but there were lots of questions. Some expected big things, others saw a transition season and others saw struggles for a very different looking team.
Pitt raised expectations in the non-con by going undefeated through most of December, including a huge win over Duke that only looked bigger further into the season. The cost, though, was the loss of starting small forward Mike Cook.

Cook was averaging over 10 points, was one of Pitt’s most athletic perimeter defenders and best free throw shooters. His loss was immediately felt in the Dayton loss immediately afterwards. Brian Roberts was able to take advantage of Cook’s absence, and torched Pitt. Dayton was also hyped and primed for this home game — from the players to the fans.

In addition, Pitt lost Levance Fields in the second half with a broken foot. Despite losing two starters, Pitt managed to go 8-4 without him (7-5 in the conference). In that period Pitt beat Georgetown and had a bad loss to Rutgers. The team did it with only 8 scholarship players — half of whom were freshmen or redshirt freshmen. by going back to the slow tempo, hard defense approach that was required without Fields and Cook. Pitt also had to be efficient on offense since the possessions will be limited — and a common theme in all the losses is that when Pitt didn’t shoot well and/or turned the ball over they lost. All of their losses had Pitt’s efficiency at 100.5 or lower — Duquesne, Duke and WVU were the only games where Pitt’s efficiency was horrible but Pitt won.

Levance Fields returned for the Marquette game, but he was not near where he was with only two days of regular practice under his belt. The blowout loss wasn’t on him, though, as Pitt just stunk. Yet it was still just one loss — no matter how bad.

Consider that Pitt has 3 “bad” losses. Either because of a poor opponent beating them soundly or being blown out: at Dayton (25 points), Rutgers (13) and at Marquette (18). How about other teams in the top-25?

Marquette (25/24) has 4 “bad” losses: at WVU (15), at Louisville (20), Louisville (24) and at UConn (16).

Notre Dame (21) has 2 bad losses: at Marquette (26) and at Georgetown (19).

Xavier (10/12) has 2: at Arizona State (22) and at Temple (19).

Texas (7) has 2: at Mizzou (13) and at Texas A&M (17).

Texas A&M (22) has 2 (and soon to be 3 after this Texas game right now): at Texas Tech (15) at K-State (21).

Vandy (20/16) has 3: at Tennessee (20), at Florida (22) at Ole’ Miss (16).

Michigan St. (19/17) has 3: at Iowa (7, but only scored 36 points), at Penn St. (9) and at Indiana (19).

Are any of these teams going to make the Final Four? I don’t see it. I do think all of these teams have a damn good chance of making the Sweet 16 and a few even to the Elite 8. If that happens, well then it comes down to match-ups and who has the big games.
Pitt had big questions going into the season about their flaws. Some were shown others not so much. It sucks that if Fields and Cook didn’t get hurt Pitt might have been a Final Four team, but that’s the way things go.

Pitt still has flaws, but so do most of the top-25 teams. Parity is very high right now. The good news, is that Pitt can get better as Levance Fields gets his game legs back.

It’s easier to be pessimistic, because you are rarely wrong.  I’m just not there with this team.