masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
January 8, 2007

SIonCampus is back with the Monday Awards, Pitt popped back into the top-10 at #8, and I offered some of my thoughts.

The ESPN.com Weekly Watch includes Levance Fields in the list of “Five you should know”

So much was made about who would replace Carl Krauser, but Fields has the ability to make it moot. Fields scored 24 points and was impressive in a road win at Syracuse.

And of course the Georgetown-Pitt game was on the list of games to be. No kidding. Considering ESPN’s college basketball show will be at the Pete.

While still on the subject of ESPN, d**k move by the WWLS to schedule “Big Monday” to start as counter-program against the BCS. Well, at least for the Big East teams it’s G-town and ‘Nova. Might as well go with the b-ball only schools.

Polls Left and Right

Filed under: Basketball,Big East,Bloggers,Polls — Dennis @ 4:20 pm

All kinds of new polls come out each Monday and here’s a few with Pitt. New AP and ESPN/USA Today polls are out with the Panthers checking in at the seventh spot in each poll. Each has the same teams rounding out the top 10 and a very young, possibly unready North Carolina team takes over the top spot.

The Big East Bloggers Poll came out after the first real week of conference play and Pitt continues to hold onto that #1 rank. The ‘Eers are closely coming in behind us; even though Pitt got many of the 1st place votes, WVU got a few and then raked in the rest of the second place votes.

This Week’s Poll (first place votes in parenthesis):
1) Pittsburgh (16): 300 pts.
2) West Virginia (3): 274 pts.
3) Georgetown: 256 pts.
4) Notre Dame: 234 pts.
5) Connecticut: 221 pts.
6) Providence: 207 pts.
7) Syracuse: 205 pts.
8) Marquette: 181 pts.
9) DePaul: 150 pts.
10) Villanova: 144 pts.
11) Louisville: 114 pts.
12) St. John’s: 82 pts.
13) Seton Hall: 79 pts.
14) Cincinnati: 54 pts.
15) Rutgers: 45 pts.
16) South Florida: 31 pts.

Looks like we managed to make South Florida bad enough that they took over the last (and definitely least) spot.

A couple ESPN Insider looks at the conference favorites and such as conference play gets under way from Fran Fraschilla:

Built in the mold of recent Panthers teams in the Howland/Dixon era, this team has no McDonald’s All-Americans but it does have a lot of depth, toughness and balance. Is there a style of play in the country that is a better fit for a city like Pittsburgh?

Doug Gottlieb:

What we know: The Big East will be a much-hyped conference, but this is clearly a transition year for the league. Gone is just about every star from last season. No more G-Mac, Quincy Douby, WVU’s Kevin Pittsnogle and Mike Gansey, Steve Novak, Taquan Dean, UConn’s five draft picks and Brandon Bowman. We are left with Aaron Gray, Roy Hibbert and Dominic James as the exceptions, so a drop-off was to be expected.

Pitt is the favorite because of its depth, but the Panthers do not have real star power, unlike some of the younger teams in the conference.

What we think: Georgetown, Notre Dame and Marquette seem like the best bets after Pitt to be consistent winners in the Big East, with Georgetown’s guards the biggest key in its ability to win the conference.

What we wonder: Is UConn any good? Is Doug Wiggins a better point guard for the Huskies than A.J. Price? Over the last eight games, Price is averaging 12 points per game in 27 minutes per while Wiggins is scoring 13 points in just 23 minutes. Yes, Price is averaging more assists but also more than twice as many turnovers as Wiggins. With Jerome Dyson and Marques Johnson as UConn’s go-to guys on the perimeter, maybe Wiggins is a better fit because of the lack of scoring punch that Hasheem Thabeet gives the Huskies?

He also wonders about Louisville and DePaul.

I have to admit that at this point, the Big East definitely seems down this year. That can change by Tourney time, but right now the Big East looks a little down.

Of course you can also say that about the Big 11, Big 12 (especially the Big 12) and the ACC as well. The drop-off after the top few teams seems steep. Right now the SEC and the PAC 10 are looking like the deepest conferences this year. This doesn’t make them the best or where the national championship is coming from. It’s just where the competition seems especially strong and deep.

You know where a team ranks on the sports landscape at times when you take a look at the byline of the articles. To be fair most of Florida is preoccupied with the Florida Gators and the BCS game tonight (*ahem* blatant plug AOL Fanhouse will be liveblogging it, I’ll be helping with peanut gallery snark on the side). The beat writers for USF apparently were pulled in and shipped off to Arizona. (At least when the Steelers were heading to the Superbowl last year the beat writers for Pitt stayed with the b-ball.) So, the articles from the Tampa and St. Pete’s papers were from Pittsburgh sportswriters.

Colin Dunlop who usually covers high school and recruiting for the P-G moonlit for the St. Petersburg Times. Meanwhile the Tampa Tribune hired the Trib-Review‘s beat writer, John Grupp to do the story (labeling him as a “Tribune Correspondent”), meaning Grupp got to do two for one. Just one of those things that amuses me.

Mike Cook wonders if the Pitt team just lacks morning people or something.

“I think it’s the early game,” forward Mike Cook said. “We struggled with that last year, too. We weren’t shooting well. We weren’t passing well. We weren’t doing anything well. We relied on our defense.”

Despite shooting 34 percent in the first half, Pitt led, 32-22, at the break after limiting the Bulls to as many field goals (9) as turnovers in the opening 20 minutes. USF managed only three field goals in the final 7:16 of the first half.

“I think we’re improving defensively,” coach Jamie Dixon said. “I don’t think that we’ll ever turn the corner. But we’re getting better. And we should improve. We are working a lot on it.”

That’s about as close as Coach Dixon will come to publicly calling out the defensive effort from his team, and it just got tossed in there as an aside comment. It was a good defensive effort, though, and nice to see Pitt clamp down when the shots weren’t going.

“When arguably your best player can have an off night and you can win convincingly you have to feel good about your team,” McCullum said. “Their perimeter shooting is one of the areas they have improved greatly. Offensively, it gives them so much more balance. It sort of makes you pick your poison. You can drop off and help on Gray and make him kick it out. They do a great job of knocking down jumpers. They have good chemistry.”

Fields was 3 for 4 from 3-point range and Ronald Ramon was 3 for 5. Levon Kendall, Keith Benjamin, Antonio Graves and Tyrell Biggs made one apiece.

I have to be honest seeing Biggs make a three bothered me. Mainly because he will probably take more 3s when he should almost never do that.

Ron Cook wonders what is going on with Aaron Gray? Well most of us are at least a little concerned at this point. I’m more concerned about the poor shooting than the lack of touches.

Pitt’s competition is about to improve dramatically. Maybe it won’t happen so much when it plays at DePaul Wednesday night, but it certainly will when it plays Georgetown, Connecticut and Marquette in a three-game homestand that begins Saturday night. Those teams are capable of lining up and playing Gray man-to-man and covering Pitt’s perimeter players. It’s fair to believe the Panthers will need Gray’s offense to win.

“Absolutely,” Gray said, nodding. “The big thing is we’re winning, but I know I have to be more consistent. I have to do my part. I think I bring a lot to the table for this team. I just have to show it.”

Wednesday night at DePaul would be a nice time to start.

The DePaul game scares the hell out of me. DePaul is unbeaten at home. They have knocked off Kansas and Cal there, and blew Wake Forest completely out of the water. The Blue Demons are a Jekyll and Hyde team, and at home they are Hyde.

Is Fields Going To Keep This Up?

Filed under: Basketball,Players,Tactics — Dennis @ 7:09 am

Maybe I’ve been wrong all along. Maybe the choice for the Big East Preseason POY was wrong. Maybe, just maybe, it isn’t imperative for Aaron Gray to need to score in double digits for us to win, but instead someone else does. Enter Levance Fields.

He’s now gone for 10+ points in seven straight games while Gray has been held to under 10 for four straight games. In the three games prior to the beginning of this streak, he was within 2 points of hitting double digits. It took Fields a few games to actually get going this year since he was not in any starting situation like this last year. Now he’s broken through as the present and future point guard for the Panthers. He’s shooting well, driving well, he knows when to pull up for the shot, and the quick release on his passes to other guards have lead to a good deal of points. (I wouldn’t mind seeing more passes down low but if it would mean he’s forcing it and turning it over then obviously I’d take the lower risk pass to another guard.)

The combo of Fields and Ramon has looked like pure gold. Fields shoots well (even with that odd over the head shot) but if he’s not shooting, he’s probably finding Ramon lining up for a three pointer.

Ramon touched on that point after yesterday’s game saying:

”When they double-team the big guys, we know it’s going to open up shots for us,” Ronald Ramon said. ”Aaron’s a smart player and he sees the double team coming. The way he passes the ball, that’s going to open up guys on the perimeter.”

Fields and Ramon have capitalized on that very well and it’s hard to ask for much more from those guys.

None of this is to bash Gray and there are probably going to be games when Fields doesn’t shoot lights out or there is a great defensive guard matched up on him. At that point, Gray is going to need to use some more athleticism to get open and get feeds from Mike Cook or Sam Young (but at the same time he probably won’t be double teamed and it’ll be easier to get the ball to him any way). Fields has been a great surprise this season though and if teams are going to do everything to stop us from getting it to Gray then Levance will be glad to take the game into his own hands.

The Panthers have some of the most balanced scoring in the nation so it’s not like there is a ton of pressure put on one player, but as with any point guard, Fields has to know there is probably a little more on him than anyone (even with all of Gray’s expectations) and moving deeper into Big East play it’ll be interesting to see if he can keep up with it all.

January 7, 2007

Petrino On His Way Out

Filed under: Big East,Coaches,Conference,Football,NFL — Dennis @ 10:31 pm

All of the major sports websites have confirmed that the Big East will be saying farewell to one of it’s coaches; Luhlvuhl’s Bobby Petrino will be heading to Atlanta and will be named the new head coach of the Falcons.

There are two ways to look at this from a Big East standpoint. Either you say it’s great that B.E. coaches (Petrino, Rodriguez, Dantonio, Schiano) are considered for jobs like these…or you can go the opposite way and say it’s not good that the conference is losing such a good coach.

I’m not sure which way to think yet, what about you?

Just a quick look about at what happened today between noon and 2 pm down in Oakland. The AP article focuses on how we were simply able to wear them away which is to be expected from us playing a team fighting off a boatload of injuries. The game was close when their starters weren’t in major need of some oxygen but as the game moved along the USF players just had a tough time keeping up.

South Florida coach Robert McCullum made gave his own comments on the Panther’s nine man deep rotation:

”Their depth makes them one of the best teams in the country. Maybe they’re not the prettiest – they won’t get a lot of style points – but they’re one of the best teams.

”Depth is one of the strengths they have,” McCullum said. ”They could take a run well into March – or April.”

All of this was easily seen for the first 8 1/2 minutes of the second half; we held them to four points in that span while opening a 42-26 lead.

I love how he mentions how this helps in March. The Big East tournament can be brutal on most of the teams because of needing to win 3 games in 3 days (or maybe even the “Orangemen Sweep” of 4 games in 4 days) but Pitt is a team built to win all those games in such a short span.

You’ll see a more on this game over the next day before we prepare for DePaul.

I’ll be making comments throughout, but I won’t be doing a full liveblog. Everyone knows the drill by now.

12:12: Pitt is looking to have the Bulls aggressiveness against the Pitt size inside work against them by drawing fouls. It looks like it will be a bit ugly and unncecessarily tight, but it should make things wide open later. Still waiting for a little more aggressiveness from Gray to the basket.

12:21: The bad, Pitt is looking a bit sloppy especially on offense. The good, they are a bit more aggressive going for rebounds.

12:29: If there is a game for Pitt not to have the shots fall — and there have been several that have just bounced around and out — this would be it. 5-21 shooting. Pitt is killing on the offensive boards (9-2 advantage), but not getting the ball back in the bucket.

12:32: Kendall gets his 3d foul with 7:15 in the half. Guess we’ll get to find out how Pitt plays with more time for Young and Biggs.

12:42: Pitt took a quick TO after Gransberry just blew past them for an easy lay-in. Biggs totally lost him. Biggs is out of the game after the TO.

1:00: Halftime. Pitt leads 32-22. A mix of things for the poor Pitt shooting — 12-35. Pitt seems to be pulling up a lot more for jumpers and taking outside shots (not 3s, but just jump shots). Cook’s jumper isn’t going, and Young seems to be pulling up again rather than taking it straight to the hoop. 3 point shooting is steady, and not over done, 5-10.

1:06: Gray picks up his 3d foul right away going over the back trying to rebound his own miss. Correction, Kendall only has 2 fouls, the third was given to Graves who also has 2. Biggs, despite poor play in the first half, looks like he gets some extra minutes. I’d like to see them move Kendall to C and bring in Young.

1:19: The Bulls are already worn down, under 14 left. USF is standing around a lot on offense trying to conserve energy. Pitt now leads 41-26.

1:29: In a scrum for the ball under Pitt’s basket USF’s Saaka is rolling and writhing in pain, forcing John Sanders to comment, “Saaka might be hurt.” Really? Way to hedge. 48-29, 10 minutes left.

1:35: USF had to expend so much energy in the first half against Pitt — keeping things close, but they have no bench to help and they are already wiped out. Pitt with under 8 minutes left has played 9 players at least 12 minutes. Fields leads with 25 minutes.

1:45: Pitt may not have been able to hit their jumpers or finish close to the rim, but man, Pitt has been hitting the 3s. 63-41, 3:14 left. Kendall and Biggs have even hit 3s. 10-16 on 3s. 13-40 everywhere else.

 1:53: 69-48 Final. Pitt had 10 players score, as Hudson added a basket at the end. Depth. Have to love having it. Inside game was lousy, but this was the time to have that kind of bad game.

The Last Easy Game

Filed under: Basketball,Big East,Conference,Opponent(s) — Chas @ 11:40 am

I love this story on the Bulls coming to the Big East with the Mike Cook quotes. Mainly when it goes off-topic to the subject of East Carolina out of C-USA.

Cook was asked to picture his former team making the transition to the Big East.

“Man, that would be real tough,” Cook said. “It would be good for the school because you could get better recruits. But as far as competing in the Big East, I don’t think we would be able to compete.

“South Florida will have a better chance than East Carolina. You have a lot of players in Florida. They’re in a much better situation than if East Carolina would be if they came into the Big East.”

East Carolina’s fanbase is more than a little miffed that it was not one of the teams invited to join the Big East and still dreams of getting into the conference. That loss in the papajohns.com bowl to USF was more than a little painful to them, since the fans were hoping it would turn into some sort of “statement” on things. Personally, other than another team, I don’t see ECU offering the Big East much to make it worth considering them. But that’s a bit of a digression.

The article has a nice discussion on recruiting Florida and how in basketball, it’s as much about TV market penetration to get recruits.

“It’s good,” Dixon said. “It’s not so much that we’ll be traveling down there because this is year two and we haven’t been down there yet. I think it’s the presence. That will happen in the Midwest as well. The games will be carried there. They will be covered more in the papers. Coming here eight years ago I thought going to Ohio would be good for us. You think location-wise it would be a good place, but they don’t affiliate with the Big East like New York does or D.C. or New Jersey, which are farther in distance but worlds apart as far as familiarity in terms of basketball.

“I think it will have an effect. We were down there with Miami, so maybe South Florida takes their place.”

Definitely so, regarding Ohio. Mahoning Valley is about the only exception, but most of Ohio has little awareness of the Big East in the local media. Antonio Graves has been about the only Ohio recruit in I don’t know how long.

As for preparing for the Bulls, well it’s game film and little else.

The matchup will give Dixon and his staff the challenge of scouting a Big East opponent with almost no familiarity or history to draw upon. Dixon started breaking down film after returning from Syracuse on Thursday night.

“We’re going to catch up real quick,” Dixon said. “We’ll have every tape of every game they’ve played. As far as familiarity, it has a nonleague feel to it. But that will change. ”

One Pitt player with at least some knowledge of the Bulls is Mike Cook. The junior forward faced South Florida for two seasons while at Conference USA opponent East Carolina.

“From watching film, they play the same type of game,” Cook said. “They play hard on both ends of the floor and try to get the game up-tempo. It’s not really that much different. They’re strong, physical and athletic.”

The Bulls are undersized as Junior Center Kentrell Gransberry is 6′ 9″. Gransberry, though, averages a double-double (13.5 ppg 10.8 rpg). USF just came from a loss at UConn and expect the same sort of style of play.

“Pittsburgh has a lot of the same qualities as UConn, except you throw in experience,” USF coach Robert McCullum said. “They defend as well as anyone in the league. They’re one of the more physical teams in the league and they don’t give you easy baskets.

“They’re so rock solid tough in man-to-man defense. It will be quite a challenge going in there. A big challenge for all those reasons.”

Pitt needs to take care of the Bulls quickly. The next 4 games are going to be brutal. Starting with a road game at DePaul, where the Blue Demons are unbeaten.

January 6, 2007

Noon tomorrow, Pitt and USF meet for the first time in conference action. Last year, Pitt missed USF on the unbalanced Big East schedule. This time its ND and Rutgers that misses Pitt.

Now, we all know that Pitt can never take a game against the Bulls for granted in football, but Pitt is O-2 against the Bulls in basketball. Losing in 1975 and in 2001.

The Bulls, as they seem to be every year, come in hurting.

The most recent casualty is sophomore forward Aris Williams, who will miss an undetermined amount of time with a femoral chondral defect in his right knee. He has already missed five games with tendonitis in his left knee.

Senior point guard Chris Capko has missed the last five games with an ankle injury and he isn’t expected to return anytime soon.

Redshirts Chris Howard and Zaronn Cann, who are both recovering from ACL surgery, have yet to see action for USF in 2006-07. Howard hopes to make his Bull debut next week, while Cann’s return remains unsure.

The Bulls lost freshman Dante Curry during the preseason because of an achilles injury suffered in conditioning.

Pitt is 1-1 this year against undermanned teams. Game notes for Pitt and USF (PDF).

ESPN is doing its free week of Full Court — both on TV and online. So if you don’t live in a place that is showing the game, you can catch it for free anywhere.

Pitt got a nice verbal today. Tony Tucker out of Washington D.C. gave a verbal to Pitt. Interestingly — as pointed out by Dokish — Tucker came from the high school where Pitt Basketball’s Director of Basketball Operations used to be an assistant principal. It probably didn’t hurt, but it didn’t help as much as when GT stopped recruiting him.

This is a solid 4-star verbal for Pitt by both Rivals.com and Scout.com. Scout.com has him as the #24 DE. Rivals.com includes him in their top-250, the #3 recruit out of D.C. and #11 at weakside DE.

ESPN.com/Scouts, Inc. also likes Tucker (Insider subs). They rank him as the #34 DE and say this about him.

Ideally, his best fit in college is on the defensive side of the ball. You would like to think he is going to continue to grow and will be able to play defensive end. If not, he may need to switch to outside linebacker. Playing out of a three-point stance, he has a good get off. He can get after the quarterback and displays some of the tools to be an effective pass rusher. He has enough burst to get upfield and get to the corner. He can make a tackle work. However, he also shows a command of how to use his body by working a quick swim or using his hands to knock blockers’ arms down. He also shows he can get to the shoulder of blockers and use the rip to work his way around the corner. He is also good enough on his feet to get tackles opened up and then take an inside charge. He takes a tight path to the quarterback. He is also a solid defender against the run.

[Emphasis added.]

Okay, I’m sold.

It’s worth noting that Kyle Hubbard, a TE commit out of Lakewood, OH has recently been downgraded to “soft verbal” according to Scout.com. Apparently Butch Davis and UNC have been coming hard after him. He appears to be going down for a visit next weekend.

And, not that I’m feeling too defensive, but I think based on the comments, I need to clarify a little regarding my post on the verbal from Maurice Williams.

I’m not upset or objecting to the recruitment of Williams. I’m quite happy he gave Pitt the verbal. I just have questions about how well he will fit what Pitt wants under Coach Dave Wannstedt.  Pitt wants speed at all positions, but wants the players in traditional rolls. Especially on the offensive side of the ball. The QB drops back, the fullback blocks and is in there for short yardage, the RB is the horse, the TE blocks first… You get the picture.

If you put the system ahead of the talent, you have to recruit the players that fit your system first. The best example might be QB Pat White for WVU. WVU got him out of Alabama because everyone else recruiting him wanted to move him. WVU gave him the promise to play QB and even they didn’t realize how well he fit the option style they run until injuries last year. Given the decisions he has to make in the offense: run, pitch or throw each time; he has the smarts to play the position. His arm was the question, but the WVU offense works for his arm strength.

I was reflecting on Wannstedt’s own words about player evaluations. It cuts both ways. That was really what I was trying to point out. If Pitt and Wannstedt want to get the best players out there. The ones that will help Pitt win, then the team has to have a better idea of how and where it wants to use the players. And be decisive about it.

Big East Improves To 5-0

Filed under: Big East,Conference — Dennis @ 3:49 pm

Cincinnati defeated Western Michigan earlier in the International Bowl up in Toronto moving the Big East’s bowl record to 5-0. Thank god Pitt didn’t get picked to play in this game or else we’d have blown it for the entire conference. Even going undefeated, the TV personalities (who like to call themselves experts) will still hold out on giving respect to this conference. No one is asking them to put us about the SEC or Big Ten (yet) but we are deserving of a BCS spot and I think we’ve shown that the last two years.

It’s still forward progress which looks like it will only keep building with the BE’s “lesser” teams such as UConn and South Florida making giant strides towards the top of the conference.

In some conference basketball news, tonight at 9 pm #14 Connecticut will travel to #19 LSU. We’ll see if UConn is a serious threat or not. They haven’t looked too great after losing to WVU in their only real challenge.

Before I hit on the stories a few other thoughts from the game.

It is very clear to me, that teams preparing for Pitt are going in with the plan of keeping Gray as far from the basket as possible when he’s on defense. Did you see how far Daryl Watkins was playing outside during the game? That is not his style. It’s been something I’ve been seeing since the Wisconsin game. Teams are doing it to keep Gray from getting good position for rebounds and to try and wear him down since it forces him to move and cover a lot more ground on defense.

Gray had 9 rebounds. Cook, Kendall, Young and Biggs had 10. The forwards have been doing a terrible job on helping on rebounds. I saw way too many possessions where Gray was the only Pitt player around the basket — on either end. It’s very hard to get defensive rebounds when no one is helping to box out. Likewise on offense, there’s no help for Gray and he’s stuck fighting off at least 2 other players for the ball.

As for the lack of touches on Gray. Obviously part of that is the fact that teams are doing everything they can to keep him from getting position down low for the easy basket, but there is something else. I think this is the one area where Pitt really misses Krauser. I know many aren’t missing a lot of the other stuff, but one of the best parts of his game as a point guard was how well he could get the ball inside. Troutman, Taft and even Lett all benefited greatly from being able to go inside and Krauser getting them the ball.

This is still a work-in-progress thing for Fields who is improving — especially as he starts penetrating more forcing the defender to play off of him a bit more. Still, it’s an area where Pitt needs improvement.

Gray for his part has to do a better job of fighting off the defenders. He is too passive in trying to establish position and is too willing to give ground. Forcing him to reset, move around and try again. His passivity is also apparent on defense where he was too willing to give ground to a player attacking the basket. Apparently afraid to get called for fouling. When he gets pulled out on defense, he has to make a decision. There was one play where he ended up in the middle two feet from the foul line and Devendorf with the ball about a foot further back. He let himself get trapped there not sure if he should step out to block Devendorf or go in to prevent an inside pass and/or be ready for the rebound. It allowed Devendorf time to just line up his shot and hit the basket.

I do love the aggressiveness from Fields and taking it inside. I think this is especially vital for him with his 3-point and mid-range shootings. With the way he cocks the ball from over his head, he needs a bit of time to essentially “wind-up” for his perimeter shot. If he doesn’t show some drives, it doesn’t create space from the defender to have time to shoot.

Okay, on to the stories. Everyone’s probably read the local recaps and lauding (deservedly) Fields’ performance. Though, the play everyone on Pitt really was happy with was Graves burying the 3 after Syracuse made another run, appeared to get Graves trapped and forced the timeout. It was the play that Syracuse remembers too.

The biggest shotof the game came with a little less than six minutes left in the game.

Syracuse had erased an 11-point second-half deficit to close the gap to 60-58. Pitt had the ball out of bounds with just five seconds left on the 35-second shot-clock. After a timeout, the Panthers inbounded the ball directly to Graves, who buried a 3-pointer from the corner for a 63-58 lead.

“We were too tight,” Boeheim said. “We were worried about the interior pass.”

Syracuse would get no closer than four points after Graves’ shot.

“That was a big shot,” SU freshman Paul Harris said. “That kind of was a dagger.”

“It was huge,” Gray said of the shot. “They actually did a great job defending it. Nichols was right in his face, but he knocked it down. It was a just huge lift at an important time.”

Graves also got lots of credit for helping contain Demetris Nichols.

Pitt used several players on Nichols, but the one who spent the most time on him was 6-foot-3 senior Antonio Graves.

“We made sure we had good quickness on him,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “He’s a great player, similar to a lot of guys at Syracuse. They just get better year after year. He’s now become an NBA-type player.”

That may be a bit of hyperbole, but his game looks so much better than last year — as has been often mentioned.

Ron Cook even gave Pitt plenty of credit. Coach Dixon — and sometimes its hard to know what is spin and what is truth — somewhat defended Gray not getting the ball much and only scoring 9 points.

Gray attempted one shot in the first 13 minutes, and at one point in the first half, eight different Panthers had scored — and Gray wasn’t one of them. But Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said he was pleased with Gray’s play against a 2-3 Syracuse zone. “We talked about that he wasn’t going to get a lot of touches, but he had to occupy the defense,” Dixon said. “He did a very good job of that.”

Syracuse spin is that Daryl “Mookie” Watkins neutralized Gray. Watkins got his props, but the concession was that Pitt was okay with that.

Still, Gray was the catalyst for an offense that beat Syracuse with its 3-point shooting. Instead of attacking Watkins on the baseline, the senior center drew the attention of multiple defenders in SU’s 2-3 zone. When the defense collapsed on him, he used his height to pass over the zone and find open shooters.

“The zone is really targeting a big man, packing it down,” Gray said. “My job is to keep the guys up and try to draw as much attention as possible. We were getting a lot of great looks on the perimeter, and our guards did a great job of knocking down shots.”

He finished with just one assist, but his passing started the good ball movement that freed the guards for open 3-pointers.

Terence Roberts doesn’t think that Kendall’s elbow to his mouth was intentional. There’s a bit of concern in Syracuse over this team, as they have to play Big East games — on the road, even.

January 5, 2007

Last night up in the Air Conditioning dome looked like we were going down do the wire for a long time and yet we pulled away in the final few minutes. The first half almost got ugly for us at points but the way we finished the half, combined with the quick start at the beginning of the second half, got us back on track quickly.

Most of this was thanks to Levance Fields carrying us through. 24 points, 3-7 on three pointers, and a handful of assists to go along with those. So far he’s filled the Krauser role well and leading us to a win over Syracuse up at their place, no matter how good or bad they are, is a breakout type of win.

Two worst stats of the game?

Free throw shooting was 9 of 17. As a ton of commenters asked, “Do we even practice foul shots?” Big Aaron Gray missing one or two in a double overtime is different since he can barely pick up his feet, let alone concentrate and shoot a good foul shot. Missing them in the first and second half (not just Gray, all players) is inexcusable. Thankfully, Fields and Ramon did a good job making most of them when they were intentionally fouling us in the last minute but missing on that many free points that they’re handing to us is not going to take us to the Final Four. Maybe not even the Sweet Sixteen.

Aaron Gray scored 9 points. The main focus of your offense needs to get the ball more than he did last night. Terrence Roberts sat out for a while and we still couldn’t feed it into him. If Levance wasn’t hitting shots like that (which I guarantee won’t happen every night) and teams keep the ball from getting inside then we might as well not expect a win. Forget the fact that they were changing defenses and packing the middle. We had plenty of time to prepare and still they held him in single digits.

Complaining after a win is hard because, after all, we won. A tournament game played like this is going to send us home though and we’ll know exactly why.

I could be premature or simply unfair, but one of my (many) concerns after this past year with Pitt football is how Pitt handles the decisionmaking on the best way to use the players and athletes.

With the successful recruiting of Maurice Williams out of Erie, PA; and thinking back to Wannstedt talking about recruiting and evaluating players earlier this week on the Sugar Bowl pregame. Now what? Williams was recruited to be a WR, but he hasn’t played the position since he was a sophomore, and he has been playing DB as well as QB.

Whiel Rivals.com and Scout.com both put him as a WR, ESPN.com/Scouts, Inc. argued that his potential lie in being a Safety (Insider subs.):

This kid is a special athlete. We are projecting him as a cover safety who can play corner and has the size to match up in press, but he is also electrifying with the ball in his hands on offense and would make a scary wide receiver. He possesses the size, strength, agility and foot speed to play any position in the secondary effectively. He is a playmaker in coverage and has the big play ability on interceptions. He is a smooth and fluid moving athlete.

A fairly glowing review, that ends with this.

In our opinion, Williams is a supreme athlete who you take regardless of what position he ends up playing because you can’t coach some of his natural tools; he could become an impact player at more than one position.

And that’s what scares the crap out of me with Pitt. Do they have a plan on where to play him? Or are they going to make a late change and potentially waste him while trying to figure out what to do with him.

Credit has to go to my favorite target Paul Rhoads who was the lead in recruiting Williams. That also means there is potential for the defense to want to get him. Especially when you consider how crowded the WR position is looking these days (and anyone want to hazard a guess as to where Dorin Dickerson will be playing in 2007?).

I go back to Wannstedt’s point on TV about the importance and challenge of making good evaluations of kids. That also goes to evaluating the right players who fit what you (want to) do. Wannstedt wants speed everywhere. Great, but he has to know where to put players like Williams and Dickerson. They are talented players, but they aren’t strictly/necessarily a single-position player in any traditional sense coming out of high school. That puts it on the coaches to figure out quickly what to do with them.

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter