Apparently if the truth is bludgeoned home enough times, you have to admit a coach may need to go. Ron Cook has had great affection for Defensive Coordinator Paul Rhoads over the years. By all accounts, Rhoads is a “good” guy and a solid interview. If you are looking for reasons why Rhoads has skated free over the years from the press asking real questions directly of Rhoads and his defense — this seems to be the simplest reason. He can’t have incriminating pictures of everyone.
Ron Cook appears as close as he is willing to come to admitting that Rhoads needs to go. I’m sorry, he doesn’t need to go. He’s the unfortunate victim of the failures of the defense.
How can someone not take the fall for that?
No, it won’t be coach Dave Wannstedt. It’s true, his first two seasons have been painfully disappointing. It’s also true his approval rating has plummeted faster than President Bush’s. But Wannstedt deserves more time. He deserves at least four seasons to show what he can do.
Defensive coordinator Paul Rhoads doesn’t have that time on his side.
His time appears to be all but up.
It would be unfair to put all of the blame for Pitt’s significant defensive shortcomings on Rhoads, in his seventh season as defensive coordinator.
Cook then proceeds to heap most of the blame on Coach Wannstedt — and there are some points that I’ll come back to in a moment — but eventually Cook has to concede to reality (sort of).
Go back even farther, to the ’03 and ’04 seasons, Harris’ final two seasons. Pitt has played 46 games since then. Its defense allowed individual backs or quarterbacks to rush for more than 100 yards 24 times, including six games of more than 200 yards. Four times, it gave up 100-yard rushing games to two players in the same game.
How can that all be personnel problems?
How can there not be schematic issues that Wannstedt needs to take a hard look at?
How can Rhoads survive?
How could any coach in his situation?
I guess he really wanted to stick with the “how” theme, but the final 2 questions shouldn’t be “How can” and “How could” but “Why should?”
Imagine that, the howling ignorant masses of fans on message boards and this blog might have been right.
As usual, there is also the ignoring of any responsibility that the DC bears in recruiting the personnel over the years — I mean, unless its a star like Revis.
Cook ends his column noting that Wannstedt has time, but sadly enough, it seems Rhoads does not.
As for what Cook said about Wannstedt, there is no doubt Wannstedt was highly defensive about his defensive approach and strategy. That Wannstedt needs to do more adapting to the players he has and the offenses the team faces is not a new complaint. It’s something, frustratingly enough, I don’t think Wannstedt is willing to do.