masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
November 10, 2006

It may not shock anyone, but AOL has no Rutgers blogger. As the lead for the Big East, it fell to me to do a lot of Rutgers blogging this week. Some things about the Rutgers game.

Greg Schiano made some astounding halftime adjustments to the defense (remember, he’s also the DC) — and there must have been one hell of a halftime speech. One of my fellow Fanhouse bloggers, Brian Cook (Michigan) came away suitably impressed by what he saw from the Scarlet Knights. Schiano recruited speed — high motor guys — for the defense, and even if the players were undersized and/or not major prospects he coached them. Taught them fundamentals. Utilized their talents in the best possible ways with some great calls and schemes.

Made the whole unit more than the indvidual players. Much in the way West Virginia and Rich Rodriguez does with the O-line. Louisville has a tremendous offense. It is balanced. They can run, they have great receivers, probably the best pro-ready QB in the Big East (and top-3 in in the country), and rather good O-line. Rutgers’ defense made Louisville’s offense in the second half look like Pitt when they faced Rutgers. You can’t tell me, there weren’t moments when you thought it was Pitt not Louisville getting swarmed. Like when they played Pitt, they compensated for the disadvantages in the secondary against receivers by keeping the QB off balance and under pressure.
Once can be an aberration. They’ve been doing this all year. It is a quality defense that isn’t afraid of any team or situation.

The offense for Rutgers did what it does. It runs. It runs a lot. Mike Teel is not the worst QB, but he definitely gets little help from his receivers. Those drops. Ugh.

For this year, it is a blow to the Big East as the odds of a Big East team making the BCS Championship are just a step above the ACC. Long-term, the Big East just demonstrated some significant depth is happening in a conference with only 8 teams.

Success for Rutgers makes recruiting there that much tougher for schools that have had a lot of good times poaching talent — BC, PSU and Maryland are going to find the going much harder. Of course, it also means, the price to keep or hire Schiano just went up.





Man, I hate BC. Seems I’m not alone according to Areton in today’s NYT:

“Not the interstate to Columbus, Ohio, or Norman, Okla., or Austin, Tex, and certainly not to Chestnut Hill, Mass., where three years ago Boston College bet its competitive future on the belief that Rutgers was genetically incapable of hosting such a festive and meaningful football occasion. That there would never be a night where the ESPN trucks would be out en masse, alongside the giant satellite dishes, with the smell of enhanced ratings, cooked meat and major bowl hopes in the air.

Robert Mulcahy, the Rutgers athletic director and chief football enabler, had the figurative knife pulled from his back, spiked it defiantly onto his desk and vowed never to schedule the B.C. deserters in any sport, ever again.”

Comment by steve 11.10.06 @ 10:43 am

Steve, I feel the same as you…I hate BC. I was not mad that Miami left the BE, I was mad that they let the ACC tell them that they had to bring BC and SU with them (purely for TV rights not because they had any love for either of those schools). I was really mad at BC and SU. In the end we are better off without Miami because I think that Louisville can be an equal program without all of the drama. Losing VT hurt, but I always thought that they were an over rated, ESPN created “powerhouse”. Losing BC was the dagger, particulary after they were not voted in to the ACC on the first try. Having Miami and VT stab you in the back was like having a second cousin turn on you. Having BC stab the BE in the back was like having an immediate family member turn their back on you. To quote the Boss: “Man turns his back on his familiy, well he just ain’t no good”! It would make my day if UConn, SU, and RU would seal off their recruiting areas and turn BC into an ACC bottom-tier team, year in and year out. It’s what they deserve.

Comment by Frank 11.10.06 @ 11:22 am

Question of the day:

If BC wanted back in to the Big East, would they be (select only one):
a)welcomed with open arms
b)permitted in but only on double-secret probation
c)deep-sixed like tea in Boston Harbor

Comment by steve 11.10.06 @ 12:19 pm

I don’t know about RU half-time speaches but Rutgers has buried their opponents in the 3rd quarter. They play like animals after the break.

I remember when the punkass schools defected to the ACC and Big East proponents would say, “Now it’s time for Rutgers, (etc.) to step up”. Well, team, now they have, and it’s nearing the time for Pittsburgh to step up.
RU made me proud last night – and I could care less about their stinkin’ football program. I was proud to see that a team that was SO bad for SO long could achieve national recognition and earn a place at the CFB dinner table.

We can forget the topic of “will the Big East keep their BCS bid?”… after last night, every fan for any team in the Big East should set their seasonal expectations a little bit higher.

When the BCS was created right before Walt Harris was hired I believed that it was possible for Pitt to play for a national championship. 10 short years later Rutgers is playing their way into the national title picture. I don’t like Rutgers, but their story is one that pretty much every Big East team can take something from. To me, Rutgers’ improbable undefeated run validates my thought that Pitt can become a factor in the national title mix. Personally, I used to think “It could be Pitt.” I will not wait another full season before I’ll be saying, “It should be Pitt.” I’ll say it and I’ll mean it, because it’s true.

Comment by Chris 11.10.06 @ 12:44 pm

“The ACC took away the 3 Big East powerhouses.”

Someone tell me the last time BC was relevant?

Comment by Jon C 11.10.06 @ 12:59 pm

If you type in “Rutgers sucks” into google (with quotes), the first result is chas’ article about Pitt losing to Rutgers on the AOL Sportsblog.

Comment by Steve 11.10.06 @ 1:54 pm

rutgers was freakin amazing last night.

Comment by danrut 11.10.06 @ 2:46 pm

This game was a disaster for the Big East. This conference really needed a team to play for a national championship and prove itself. That won’t happen now. I was rooting for L ville the rest of the way. At the very least, we would know what to expect if Pitt were to be undefeated in the futre, just as L ville almost was. Rutgers representing the Big East in the BCS? Sure it’s good to root for the underdog, show depth and all that junk. But I think it’s more important for an undefeated L ville go to a national title game then it is for Rutgers to “challenge” Wake Forest in a BCS game.
I tunred on the radio and heard these boneheads trash the Big East once again.

Comment by Eric R 11.10.06 @ 2:56 pm

Eric, the guys on ESPN were the exact opposite, heaping praise on the conference.

I mean it’s ESPN, but they are in charge of most of the unenlightened people’s conception of sports.

Comment by Aaron 11.10.06 @ 3:16 pm

im not even really stressing over Pitt football anymore this season, it is almost Bball and Pitt will not disapoint in that, this is the year they finally get past the sweet 16 and make the final 4… GO PITT

Comment by Max 11.10.06 @ 5:16 pm

Agree with Aaron that this might really work for the best for the Big East. Here’s a realistic scenario. After this weekend Rutgers is 9-0, Louisville should be 8-1 and WVU should be 8-1 – and all should be in the top 10. Rutgers should jump from 13/15 to above 10 in my mind, and Louisville will drop some spots.

But, if Rutgers beats WVU and then they all win out we could have as many as three teams in the Top 10 at the end of the season. Could look like this…

RU = 11-0
UL = 10-1
WVU = 10-2

Remember that the end of the season is when the BE strength of schedule kicks in for computer rankings.

If the BE wins their Bowl games would make it even better, but certainly we can finish strong.

Actually the worst thing that could happen was for the BE to field a team in the Nat’l Championship and have it blown out (since hind sight is 20/20 could you imagine Louisville going up against OSU or UM considering what we saw last night?).

Comment by Reed 11.10.06 @ 5:32 pm

While watching the game last night I had the thought that Rutgers was fielding a team exactly like the one DW wants to have in the future. Strong running game with a power runner and an effective FB; a passing game that complements the run and can get first downs (WRs dropped a lot last night) and fast, mobile defenders that flow to the ball. Rutgers has it all and as I have thought, they are very good.

What I was left with after those thoughts were that all that goes well only if you have coaching that gets the best out of the players, and have players that can believe in that coaching and have the character not to toss in the towel as soon as the other team get a decent lead. It seems to me that that has been a hallmark of PITT teams over the years; they can’t seem to understand that the game is played for 60 minutes. Correct me if I’m wrong – but have there been many come from behind victories in the last decade where we had to make up a large deficit in the second half – and did it?

There has been a lot written lately about PITT, the coaching staff and what needs to be done in the future – and if it even can be done. I don’t have a coaching background, but I do know this… if DW can’t take some of the approach he saw Rutgers so successfully use against Louisville, and at least try to apply it in our game, then we are in trouble.

Comment by Reed 11.10.06 @ 5:48 pm

The rampent rumor is will Schiano coach at Miami next year?

Comment by Jimbo B 11.10.06 @ 9:11 pm

Has anyone else heard the rumor that “the U” is considering dropping ALL sports programs? Apparently that is the talk in Miami this week. I am sure that it is wishful thinking, but I know that they do have budget issues when it comes to sports. If they fire Coker they will have to pay him ~$9M. That will hurt.

Comment by PantherSig 11.10.06 @ 9:51 pm

Watching that game the other night made me want to go out and buy some Scarlet Red clothing with a R on my chest! That school more than anyone deserved that win, those are the type of wins I wish Pitt could pull off, a fun stadium rocking with purely home fans…a last second win over a national top five team….that’s what I buy season tickets for….how much longer do we have to wait for wins like that…..go Rutgers, and yes they get my vote for #1 in the country, b/c who has Ohio played other than Texas? Who has Michigan beat other ND…..Big East is better than ever….all we need is one more school and we’re set for the future!

Comment by Marco 11.11.06 @ 11:30 am

The best thing that could have happened was Lville winning on a last minute field goal. That way Lville stays undefeated and still can play for the title while Rutgers still gets the respect and shows that they are legit. Now the BE is F’d.

Comment by Rex 11.11.06 @ 11:40 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter