Morning everyone. I’m nursing a bit hangover this morning, and I still have to drive back. I haven’t had time to read all the comments yet, but I’m looking forward to it. I assume it was as frustrating to watch on TV as it was live.
A couple questions. Was that really a late hit by Blades on the sidelines in the second half? It sure didn’t look like one to us. Did Kinder fumble? As soon as they announced it was under review, the jumbotron shut-down any replays for the fans to see. An annoying thing at Heinz Field to not show any replays of reviewed plays. There was a general sense in the stands that the officials sucked for this game. Either that, or they were instructed by the Big East offices to make sure Rutges won.
No, I’m not feeling bitter this morning.
Rutgers didn’t need the help. They were the better team then Pitt last night. Their lines far outplayed Pitt. DC Paul Rhoads is now reaching Hackett-levels of my disgust for the way he calls defenses. Isn’t it about time for one of the papers to run a soft feature on him, that paints him in a human, favorable light?
Direct comments that I wrote down in my notepad at halftime:
“Pitt hasn’t played particularly well. Bad O-line and no running game. D has been out a lot. Continually unable to stop Rutgers on 3d and short. Noting going Pitt’s way right now.
“That Pitt is only down 6-0 is because RU’s receivers can’t hold onto the ball.
“The band is now playing some Phantom of the Opera. I hate Andrew Lloyd Weber.
“Neither team should be happy with their play in the first half. Problem for Pitt is that RU is running real well, and will probably continue to do so and wear down the D further. Help needed on the line.”
These were some other comments from the second half.
“No pressure and soft coverage in a Paul Rhoads defense? What are the odds?”
The box score just disgusts me. Rutgers had 14 more plays on offense (and it seemed like more). Teel only attempted 18 passes because Pitt made no effort to adjust to stopping the run.
I’ll have more later. I need some more time and I have to leave soon.
Someday we can only hope we’re the undefeated ranked team that Trangrehese tells his officials to favor. But so far we haven’t gotten those kind of calls in hoops games…
but lets face the fact that pitt lost this game. pitt couldn’t control the lines, pitt couldn’t keep any drives going, and pitt was the team that stupidly refused to put another man in the box because paul rhoads wants a cushioning defense. ray rice running for 215 yards is unnaceptable, and not all but much of the blame should fall on rhoades.
i have never seen a team lose moment like the way pitt did when they scored the td (one of the best plays of palko’s career), capitalized on foster’s mistake on the KO to down him at the 10, and then gave up a 65 yard run.
Opponent has rusher with over 200 yards (Julius Jones), lackluster play from their QB (Brady Quinn)….couple this will soft non-run-blitzing defense from Pitt, an 0-line that got dominated up front and couldn’t protect their QB (at the time it was Rod Rutherford).
The similarities are striking.
Sorry for the following up my own post…My mood is the same as every other Pitt fan right now.
It was a big play (mistake) because it directly led to Rutgers first TD.
And I was one of the people who asked if Tranghese called the refs and reminded them that Rutgers was ranked higher.
So it’s a loss, but I wasn’t that upset because Rutgers was obviously faster and stronger. Palko kept us in the game. And I think Hillgrove said during the game that Schiano’s had enough time to establish his program and this is where Wanny wants to be. Just don’t let up at South Florida.
And I think this quick Rutgers team could potentially beat both WVU and Lousiville, both teams that have looked human lately.
The team has had a lot of success with that quick three-step-drop-and-throw rhythm passing game this year, and it seemed like they had no interest in even trying it last night. Why?
*&^%$!!!!
The short over the middle passes weren’t there becuase the safeties were up in run support (imagine that) and clogged the holes.
Basketball is right around the corner.
1.) Pitt was the better team hands down.
2.) The officials called one of the worst games I’ve witnessed in 5 years.
3.) Pitt WRs choked when they were needed the most.
4.) Paul Rhodes can’t call big games…matter of fact he makes a living at sucking at it!
5.) Pitt hasn’t won a big game since Walt Harris…how much longer do we have to say…next year!
6.) It’s called Blitzing, try it some time Paul / Dave!
7.) How the hell does NJ have such big guys on the line and we don’t?
8.) Pitt wins that game 2 out of 3 times…
9.) Another big deflating loss to a ranked team…go figure…I’m so sick of it!
Dude, are you sure you were watch the Pitt/Rutgers game? Rutgers dominated both lines. They were probably 12/12 on 3rd and short. Exactly what aspect of the game did pitt win? The refs may have made a couple of bad calls but none of them had to do with Rutgers coverting all 3rd and shorts. Rutgers is better. They will compete with Louisville…not WVU though.
Take away all the bad calls, dropped passes, poor defensive coaching and the fumbles and what do you have left? Rutgers still beating us up on both lines, and Rice and Leonard still rushing for good positive yardage and first downs all night long.
We are a better team than last year, and not as good as we will be in the next few years. But that’s where we are.
Guys, this team can (and likely will) go 8-4 and go to a decent bowl. Frankly, after last year, I’m taking that kind of progression.
Call it defeatist thinking, but it’s true.
2.) The officials called one of the worst games I’ve witnessed in 5 years. get over it. We wouldn’t have won if we got all the calls
4.) Paul Rhodes can’t call big games…matter of fact he makes a living at sucking at it! Nothing new here
5.) Pitt hasn’t won a big game since Walt Harris…how much longer do we have to say…next year! Walt Harris is gone, stop bringing up his name
6.) It’s called Blitzing, try it some time Paul / Dave! agree
7.) How the hell does NJ have such big guys on the line and we don’t? I have no idea
8.) Pitt wins that game 2 out of 3 times… You’re smoking something
9.) Another big deflating loss to a ranked team…go figure…I’m so sick of it! We all are.
Even with all the angst of last night, I still think we might have a chance to steal a game against Louisville – maybe keep it close going into the 4th quarter and come out on top. Not that we will, but I’m not chalking up a certain loss at this point.
As good as Rutgers is, and I think they are very strong, we were down by 6 at the half, and by 3 in the fourth quarter. Pretty close, and close enought to have come out with a win with a lucky break or two. We’ll get some turnovers going our way against UL hopefully.
WVU will blow us out of the water I think, unless something drastic changes in the defensive coaching philosophy. Strong as ever on the ground and their passing game is getting better as the season progresses.
Looking forward to the SFU game, and the team rebounding, which they have shown they can do already once this season.
P.S. This time in 3 weeks Pitt BBall is 1-0.
tommy campbell = bigger faster version of zeke gadsen turn him loose. against a “bigger, stronger” team big hits and resulting turnovers are key. do mike phillips and sam bryant have to wash their jerseys after the game? they could have played better sitting up in sec 523 with me.
next year w/out palko will be very grim. both louieville and wvu games will be ugly. uconn and south fla are playing better lately. not a sure win either one. i thought rutgers d backs were over matched. the shots downfield that were droped were open yet never went back to them. go to max protect and let the wr beat his man once in a while!
Bottom Line: Pitt is still a joke. We beat up on a few cupcakes and lose every game against a legit team. Thats just the plain ugly truth and it pains me to say it but you know what they say the first step to recovery is admitting the problem.
The ONE difference between what is going on now and all the Harris years is: We are getting kick ass recruits. In all the time Walt had: 1 5 stars and 2 4 stars….most of our recruits were 2 stars. If you think we have bad coaching, well if we can at least have good players, we should start winning. Don’t underestimate the kind of players Wanny is bringing in. Things will change after he has been there 4 years. I know as Pitt fans we are tired of hearing that, but for the first time in 30 years, we are getting the players. Walt’s best recruiting class was ranked #25, all the others never cracked #40. Wanny’s first was #9. Not bad.
Ummm… I guess I could be happy the Penguins won or something, but it’s not the same.
I saw Rice running down the road in full pads being chased by H.B. Blades. So I guess that one commenter is right, Rice is still running for yardage on us!!
Blades (19 tackles) and Session (10 tackles) were outstanding. They will be difficult to replace next year. Enjoy watching them while you can.
The vast majority of Wanny’s recruits are freshman. I believe he only was able to get a few recruits in during the short time after he took the job in late 2004 (Stull was one of them I believe).
We’re going to get better. With the class that came in and the classes to come, it’s all but guaranteed. Wait until Wanny’s first full class hits their junior year. That’s when we’ll be seeing REAL improvement.
But so far this year, we’ve already improved. I’ll take 8-4 or 7-5 with a bowl game over having a losing record anyday.
It’s silly to let losses to good teams shake your faith at this point.
Not to get into a whole rant or anything, but I always see people complaining and whining about how nobody shows up to the games, and how we can never get over the hump, but then when we lose a game, people start acting like we’re Temple.
Just for the record:
RUTGERS is GOOD. REAL GOOD. This isn’t 1993, and they aren’t going 1-11 every year anymore. We didn’t lose to a 1-AA team last night. No, we weren’t “embarrassed” last night, as much as some of you want to think. We still are 30th in both polls, for Pete’s sake! It’s not like people saw this game and said, “oh, Pitt sucks hard” – they probably said, “damn, Rutgers went into Pitt and played tough and won”. I’d bet anything that for every person that lost respect for Pitt after this game, 1,000 gained a lot more respect for Rutgers.
I guess people can dismiss me as a fan that doesn’t truly care, but you have to look at the big picture sometimes. Jimbo said it perfectly, “It’s silly to let losses to good teams shake your faith at this point.”
All of our “National Championships” save one – 1976, were before WWII when college football was parochial, and Western PA really had the toughest HS football anywhere in the country on a consistent basis. It’s not like that anymore.
Can we be a consistent Top 25 team? A resounding yes! Is that a worthwhile goal for PITT? In my eyes it is, and one that we can achieve. But, to think that we are ever going to be a football factory like USC, Ohio State, Notre Dame etc. and have that kind of modern day success is, to me, not going to happen. We’ll have our ups and downs, make runs at BE and Natl titles some years, and play in some major and minor bowl games. So, if we can maintain a consistent winning program I believe we will have met our program’s realistic aspirations.
Any school’s success is going to be like a sine curve, up for a stretch and down for a stretch. The best programs never go down to far for too long. Our long term focus should be to never have another decade like the 1990s.
DW has this program moving in the right direction, the BE is moving in the right direction and we are seeing a general rise in the level of football – recruiting, W+Ls, and yes, competitiveness. I’ll not compare this version of PITT football to Harris’ last years because it serves no purpose. I’ll be patient and enjoy what I can as a fan, even if there are some setbacks along the way.
3 unbeaten teams in the top 16 will do that.
The big east is much much better. Better than the ACC. Who would have though that too years ago?
is there anybody here that didn’t think they would try and run the ball?? what was the defensive scheme to stop the run? what adjustments were made?
the game could have been ugly, they missed a field goal, dropped a touchdown pass, did almost anything they wanted at any time. it is time to start expecting MORE not justifying how good rutgers is! everybody should be TICKED, we lost to rutgers! unacceptable any time, any year, any place……….
Harris was 52-44 over his 8 years at PITT, with a career winning percentage of 60%. His first three years were 13-21.
Wanny is 11-8 so far at about 57% win percentage, in a year and a half.
It took four years for Harris to have a better than .500 final season record. I’m thinking DW will probably be at that point in this, his second year.
Point to this? People gave Harris a grace period before he started producing. DW should be afforded the same.
I’ll say it again: this isn’t 1993, and no matter how much you want to beat Rutgers 70-7 every year, it ain’t happenin’. Get over it.
And to back up John’s point:
I am a young alumni. Want to know why I don’t go to Pitt games? It’s TOO DAMN EXPENSIVE. It has NOTHING to do with some of the crap reasons I’ve heard here – like “oh, well we can’t beat teams that we shouldn’t beat at home.” A Pitt football game, including transportation, food, alcohol, the tickets, and incidentals would run me around 300 bucks for one day of entertainment. Not to mention the six hours in transit. I was planning to go this last weekend to the Rutgers game, but when it costs me, a 23-year-old entry level employee, one whole week’s paycheck and six hours of travel, it’s just not worth it.
I’ve spent an hour every Friday trying to find somewhere to watch the game, searching through other alumni, and bars where I’ll be the only Pitt fan there watching – so, my non-football attendence has nothing to do with my desire to root the team on, and everything to do with simple economics. I just can’t afford it.
Here’s what we should do – if this loss really, really bothers you, tune it out. If your opinion of PITT and it’s program is so low that you can’t stand it, get another hobby or switch your emotional and financial support to something else.
Pointing out a team and coaching staff’s weaknesses and mistakes are one thing, explaining how those mistakes can and should be corrected is another, and speculating on what the results might be is part of being a fan. But ranting on and on about what has already happened, serves no purpose.
The other thing– if you think we are complaining about the attendence now, after this L it will probably be even worse (I am sad to say). I live in central PA and I would pay the $200 every year for season tickets if I didn’t have to work so much on the weekends. I was able to go to most games last season, but the $200 for 7 home games isn’t all that terrible to me. At first I wasn’t sure, but $200 probably touches the limits of my tolerance. I would think long and hard about season tickets if they went up anymore though. Not many alumni stay in the city or even western PA, and that is why a city school like Pitt must keep the tickets reasonable. Residents in the city will only compare everyone and anything to that other team that plays at Heinz.
Reed, I see your point but you cant really compare Harris’ first 4 years with DW’s tenure. Harris came to a dead program with a crumbling stadium. The program was on life support. DW inherited a team that while not great had a lot of talent at the skill positions, had good senior leadership, and a team that has been consistently winning since 2000 with brand new first class facilities.
I’ll say it again, It is time to expect more. If we lost to Michigan or USC then I am willing to overlook things because we arent at that level yet. But we should be at Rutgers level right now and not in a few years. I’m sorry thats just my opinion.
I’m willing to give a new coaching staff a couple years to get things moving in their direction. I think we are seeing it already in some ways. It’s exciting to be a fan, and disappointments come with the territory. And, while I speculate with the best of them (my prediction for Sat. nite was 27-17 PITT) I also understand that I have to take the good with the bad.
If we should be at a certain level, and we are not – what do you do? Well, make staff coaching changes for one – and I wouldn’t be surprised to see that happen in this offseason. I should hope DW takes a good long look at just where our weaknesses are – rushing defense specifically, and over all defensive deployment generally. i.e. Rhoades’ input.
Secondly, take a good look at the Head Coach’s vision for the program and if it fits. I’m not sure about this, and have a niggling belief that DW might be a little too stubborn in his pushing the power running game at this point, and with this group of young players. Sometimes I wonder if there is a big difference between coaching in the Pros and in College, and if he is having a hard time adjusting. But, again, I’ll defer for a couple years.
Thirdly, we can get better on field personnel. I think DW’s done pretty well with that so far in his recruiting, and seems to be continuing it this year.
Lastly, we can make sure the meetings, practices, and games are being entered into as a team, and that internal disruptions and distractions are minimal. Again, sounds like that was a problem last year, and has been corrected well. But, I don’t know what goes on behind the scenes. I do know that we suffered a big loss to MSU, could easily have tucked our chins down and tanked, but instead bounced right back. If we can do the same against SFU and U Conn after this much closer and more dramatic conference loss, I’ll have to think that DW has the kids pretty well in hand.
If we are having these same aguments at the end of 2007 and 2008 then the program will have to really take a look at itself. For now though, I think I’ll give DW the benefit of the doubt and ride out this season, however it plays out.
The personal foul on Blades was an absolutely atrocious call. The guy was still in bounds and running up the sideline; what is Blades supposed to do? Politely ask him if he wouldn’t mind stepping on the white line? And why the hell wouldn’t one of the other officials overrule the guy who threw the flag? Ugh.