Yesterday, SI.com listed Pitt at 60 out of 119 Div. 1-A schools. Behind Rutgers and USF in the Big East. Today they have their snippet BE Preview. Basically they put Pitt at 6-6 (3-4 in conference), and tied for 5th in the conference with UConn. I realize there are diminshed expectations, and I’m trying not to be all fan-boy, but this sort of thing ticks me off. I guess, in large part because there is no explanation for anything. Just their predicted final records. Not even a capsule exlpanation (I know, you have to buy the magazine). Here’s how they rank some of Pitt’s non-con foes this seasn
Virginia — 44
Michigan St. — 33
UCF — 46
Toledo — 61
The rankings for Virginia, UCF and Toledo have me flummoxed. And I am just not seeing USF (50, 4th in the BE) as that good with the loss of Andre Hall at RB. Their top WR gone, the same QB because the other had to leave because of grades and a dope bust, and a third of their recruiting class learning to read or fighting legal issues.
As for the best players in the BE. SI.com has H.B. Blades at #4, and that’s it. I mean, sure they have Darrelle Revis listed as an All-American CB, but he isn’t one of the top-10 players in the Big East. That about sums up the preview.
CBS Sporsline has its Big East preview posted. You have to get through the puff piece on WVU first — in fact it’s the majority of story — but it is essentially the same thing they had in their print preview mag (hmm, I still have a couple more of those to do). The big difference is that Pitt is now listed ahead of Rutgers in order of finish (3d instead of 4th).
Both previews single out H.B. Blades as the team’s star and big performer for the year.
Rutgers has a very long tradition..
let’s just leave it at that.
Mason’s gone & DelSardo is apparently not happy with the direction the coaches have gone with the youngsters (I’m assuming this is the reason behind the ‘conduct suspension’ and I might be off base). But, TJ Porter keeps shining – pretty dramatically it sounds like from the camp reports – and DelSardo probably wasn’t going to get much playing time in DW’s emphasis on fielding speed. I’m of two minds with DelSardo’s case, on one hand he stuck it out for three years and should be rewarded for that, on the other hand we need to win now and there are other receivers who fit into the system better. Tough choice for a coach, but looks like DW made a decision on it during last year’s training camp and is sticking to it.
Pitt has 9 national titles, that is something to be proud of. When Pitt was winning in the 70’s, even though I didn’t live through those years, I still have the impression we garnered a decent amount of national respect. I can still see it today. I hope DW can get us back there. He’s the man to do it. Hopefully our pateince will be rewarded- it is about time.
I think Pitt basketball has made large strides in gaining national respect. Maybe not as much as it sometimes should, but it has gotten better. It can happen.
I try to temper my expectations to doing well in the conference, being competitive in every game and having the team progress each year.
I really believe a national championship – while it’s a good thing – should not be the make or break standard to hold PITT to. That’s just unrealistic in my view.
Now, that said, if DW can get a winning season this year (not too much to hope for) and have some of his players drafted in the higher rounds (again, could happen) we’ll see more talent, and media, look our way and begin to see a strengthening program. His recruiting has been good (even this year with a slower start) and the proof will be how he produces with his own players, meaning I think 2007 & 2008 are his critical years. If everything falls into place talent wise, DW can get these kids to play as a team, and his X&O coaching is good, maybe we can get to the top of the heap, but a lot of things have to fall into place.
I’m betting he’ll do well, although I’m concerned about the personnel issues that have cropped up.