masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
January 7, 2006

Some National Notes

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 6:27 pm

Keith covered them before I had time, but there were some items in the big sites concerning Pitt. Mike DeCourcy, laments the loss of conference teams playing each other in a season by virtue of conference expansion and raiding.

Villanova at Pittsburgh. Two of the few remaining unbeaten teams in Division I are in the same state, the same league, but will not play during the regular season. How does that happen? I’m not blaming Mike Tranghese, the Big East commissioner. I’m blaming those who plundered his league a few years back.

But what an intriguing matchup this would be. Pittsburgh has three players with point guard skills who might be able to drive the ball against Villanova’s disturbingly disruptive defense. The Panthers have a legit center in 7-0 Aaron Gray. They’ve got an athletic power forward, freshman Sam Young, who might be able to defend one of the Wildcats’ four guards and also make good use of his size advantage. The Panthers are not quite on Villanova’s level, but they would provide a good matchup.

It also happens because of TV and expectations. Pitt and Villanova have played every year except the 00-01 season since 1977. While the rivalry between the schools hasn’t been anywhere near what it was in the late 80s when ‘Nova and Pitt were swiping recruits from each other and really pissing both off, and I wasn’t too upset going into the season given the expectations of both teams. I admit some curiosity as to what would happen. Perhaps in the Big East Tournament?

Luke Winn does his power 16 and debuts Pitt at #16. I’ll offer the explanation as to why he seemingly inexplicably talked about Kendall rather than the other players on Pitt. Kendall’s U-21 performance meant that every college basketball writer made a mental note to keep an eye on Kendall once the season began. Pre-planning their stories on how the game was a springboard to the season and stardom. It hasn’t happened, and that’s annoying when you want a storyline. So, on one of the first chances to talk about Pitt this season, of course Kendall will get mentioned. Just as next Thursday for Pitt’s ESPN season debut, you can bet Kendall’s U-21 game will be mentioned at the first chance they get.

Then Joe Lunardi has to make his semi-compliment to how Pitt is doing in his weekly chat (Insider Subs.):

Rob : New Castle Pa.: Any love starting to come Pitts way after their last 3 wins. This also is a team that is really starting to look even better for next year. If tourney started today where do you see them placed.

Joe Lunardi: Now that we’ve seen the Panthers succeed against quality competition both at home and on the road, their NCAA profile is dramatically improved. At this moment, I have Pitt’s in the nieghborhood of a 5-6 seed (and certainly rising).

Bracketologists like Lunardi and national columnists in general don’t like to note their own inconsistencies. In the chat he also comments that Illinois is a border #1 or #2 seed. On the RPI, Illinois is #7 and Pitt is #8. Their non-con SOS’s aren’t too far apart 125 to Pitt’s 137 at the moment. It has as much to do with preseason expectations and reputations (short and long). Pitt is dinged for not being thought too highly going into the season and a recent history of pathetic non-cons. Illinois is coming off losing in the NCAA championship and preseaosn rankings.

While on that subject, Seth Davis whacks UConn and other schools for a weak non-con as, of course, being the reason they dropped a seeming gimmee.

The question burns: How could a veteran team like Connecticut, which is ranked No. 2 and has designs on winning a national championship, get shellacked 94-79 at Marquette, which starts three freshmen and has lost to Winthrop and Nebraska?

I’ll give you seven reasons: Army, Texas Southern, UMass, New Hampshire, Morehead State, Stony Brook and Quinnipiac. Those are the seven opponents UConn faced after winning the Maui Invitational in late November. And all of those games were at home.

That is hardly the way to prepare a team for a conference road game, but that’s the kind of schedule Huskies coach Jim Calhoun usually puts together in December. To be fair, UConn has two legit nonconference games ahead, at home against LSU on Saturday and at Indiana on Feb. 4. You could also argue that the Big East is so deep and tough that there’s no sense adding extra difficult road games outside the conference.

Nor is Calhoun the only coach to get snakebitten by this home-schooled approach. According to Collegerpi.com, No. 20 George Washington’s schedule is ranked 297th out of 334 schools. When the Colonials faced their first road test on Dec. 30, they lost to N.C. State by 21. Likewise, No. 9 Louisville’s home-heavy slate is ranked 191st. The Cardinals’ comeuppance came in a 12-point loss at Kentucky.

Meanwhile, no mention of Pitt and a very grudging acknowledgment that weak non-con scheduling hasn’t exactly been a problem for UConn for winning national championships. No one is exactly taking BC’s non-con to task because there were expectations for them, and even if they don’t seem to be meeting them, it is early.

Here’s a few things. I don’t like weak non-cons for more experienced teams because those are the teams that need to stay sharp and not get complacent. Younger teams have the whole confidence and learning to play with each other vibe going to excuse a weaker non-con — an argument that could be made in Louisville’s favor. In fact, I think there is an argument to be made for a sliding scale as to how important a tough non-con is to a team, depending on their experience.

I dislike a weak non-con for Pitt on purely selfish grounds. I want to see them play. I live out of market and the weaker the opponents the less likely they will be shown on TV. I mean, they don’t make their national TV debut until mid-January. They only had 3 non-cons out of 11 even televised for ESPN Full Court PPV. To some degree, the weak non-con argument becomes an easy crutch for writers. A shorthand explanation when a team loses without having to think much about it or even look closely as to what happened. I know I used it last season after the Bucknell, G-town and St. John’s losses.





Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter