masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
August 23, 2005

BlogPoll, Week 1, Pre-Season

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 12:47 pm

The inaugural BlogPoll debuts. Big props to Brian for the time and effort in putting this project together. You can see every voter’s ballot here, by clicking the green checkmark. Here’s my ballot with my comments from last week.

In the Poll, Pitt is ranked at #24. Apparently, Pitt had one of the lowest variations of rankings from poll to poll. I ranked as having high bias (defined as where you put your team versus where they came out on the blogpoll) for putting Pitt at #15. I’m not surprised where Pitt ranked. To some degree it’s my own fault for not getting around to doing a blogpoll question on the subject of making a case for why a team(s) should or shouldn’t be ranked in a spot. I like to think I could have made a persuasive case to have at least gotten Pitt to #21 with the voters.

Still, this should be an interesting venture.





Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter