masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
February 20, 2005

Pitt-Villanova: Game Plan and Personnel

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 11:45 pm

First, all respect to ‘Nova. They had a game plan for dealing with Pitt, and executed it well. Everyone looks to Allen Ray as being the reason when he went off hitting 5 of 6 3s at one point in the second half as keying the win. They were big scores no doubt. They were created, though, because Pitt had to respect Villanova making shots inside. Curtis Sumpter — who could go inside or out on his own, Lowry and Foye; all 3 could penetrate and take shots from anywhere. Pitt was chasing these guys all over the place. It kept Pitt off balance. It gave guys like Ray and Nardi a chance to set up or take a shot right off of a screen.

How many times did you see Troutman all the way out on the perimeter? That just shouldn’t happen. It wasn’t just the foul trouble that limited Troutman to only 4 rebounds. He was not inside to get position.

Villanova shot the ball well from everywhere. In the first half, they shot 4-7 from beyond the arc and 9-19 everywhere else. In the second half, despite how it seemed, they shot a little worse 8-16 on 3s and 4-11 the rest. For the game, they shot over 47%. Pitt can’t win when an opponent shoots that well against them. Few teams can.

Still, the frustrating thing, as I look at the box score. Pitt was so close despite it all. It just took too long before they got it together to make that final run, and the hole was too deep. Against Syracuse, they were down by 8 with almost 7 minutes left. This time, down by 11 with a little more than 4 minutes left. Krauser worked it hard in the last couple minutes, finally drawing the contact to get Sumpter and Sheridan to foul out on consecutive possessions. Pitt got it to within 3 with a minute and a half left — 71-68. They just couldn’t stop Villanova.

Ray hit a tough jump shot on the penetration and drew the foul. Then at the other end, Krauser got trapped on a double team. No help was coming right away and when he tried to split it, he went down and was called for the travel. At that point, Pitt was forced to start fouling, and the final score ended up 80-72.

Here’s what can make it even worse to me. You look at Pitt’s offensive numbers for the game, and you realize they were essentially only 1 or 2 shots from their season average by percentage. Pitt shot 4-13 on 3s, 30.8%. Make one more of those and it is suddenly at 38+%, closer to Pitt’s average of 41%, and it raises the overall shooting percentage to about 49%. Same with free throws. Just one more conversion and they would have been about at their season average. I know, pointless. Just one of those things when you look at the numbers after a while.

Individual comments

Aaron Gray had a solid game. Gave Pitt 15 points, 7-8 shooting, in 15 minutes. A lot of easy buckets when other players drew the attention. What I liked, was that he caught the ball and put it right up. He didn’t try and put the ball on the floor first. A major step and a big reason why no one was able to contest his shots. Only 2 rebounds, though. Villanova was creating a lot of long rebounds with their jump shots. He still needs to work on free throw shooting.

Chris Taft played well. 11 points and 8 rebounds. A couple points where he settled for a short jump hook, rather than muscling inside further for the better shot. Team’s leading rebounder in the game.

Ronald Ramon did not look comfortable. He expended a lot of energy on defense, which was good, but the speed of Villanova’s guards definitely caught him off-guard. He did not seem happy with his shot.

Antonio Graves actually played better defense than usual. He needs to be better with his shot selection, but is showing more willingness to try and penetrate on offense — he just needs to finish. Grabbed 7 rebounds, necessary when the rebounds are coming out further.

Levon Kendall actually played well for being totally out of water for this game. Despite ‘Nova’s fast guards, Kendall did a good job of keep them in front of him in his 18 minutes. Played very smart.

I keep hoping that Mark McCarroll will suddenly get it going. It just hasn’t happened. The scariest thing is when he goes to the free throw line. McCarroll is now 4-23 (17.4%) at the line this year. Even basketball stats guru, Ken Pomeroy estimated that McCarroll may be the worst FT shooter in the major conferences.

Carl Krauser had a rocky game, but he still nearly pulled it out at the end for Pitt. 16 points, with half coming at the FT line. He had 5 rebounds, and 4 steals. Unfortunately he also had 6 turnovers and only 2 assists.

Chevon Troutman was the focus of ‘Nova’s defense. He constantly faced double teams, but did a good job of passing out of them, as represented by having 4 assists and only 1 turnover. Still, not a good game for Troutman. Only 9 points and 4 rebounds. The Wildcats were able to draw him out to the perimeter on defense where he there was more room for the ‘Nova players to run and avoid banging against him. As a result, he got into foul trouble and had to sit for a stretch in the second half.

Crap

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 3:42 pm

Another team that could hit the 3. Not as simple as that, but this is a frustrated snap reaction. Villanova hit jumpers, they could score quickly. You want to know why Pitt lost to WVU and ‘Nova, but not ND? Penetration. ND couldn’t the other 2 teams could. Pitt is just unable to handle teams that can go inside and out with consistency.

Pitt-Villanova: Issues of Threes

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 8:56 am

In 2 of Pitt’s 4 losses and the 3-drink minimum to watch game with ND, the issue was the other team dropping 3s. That is what Pitt will be facing with Villanova.

Villanova is a lot like West Virginia and Notre Dame in that the Wildcats use the 3-point shot as a major part of their offense. They shoot 36.7 percent from behind the arc, behind only Pitt (41.0) and Notre Dame (39.5) in the Big East. They average almost 20 3-point shots a game.

“They’re kind of similar to Notre Dame as far as perimeter scoring goes,” Dixon said. “But they do it off the dribble and use penetration to find guys. They let them create.”

Villanova is the highest-scoring team in the Big East, averaging almost 76 points per game in conference play. The Wildcats are led by the high-scoring guard trio of Allan Ray, Randy Foye and Mike Nardi. All three average in double figures for the season. Ray (17.2 points per game) is the top scorer and 3-point shooter (43.1 percent).

That means Pitt’s guards will need to stay on them. Graves and Ramon will get the bulk of the time. Benjamin may only get extended minutes if one of them gets into foul trouble.

Shooting a lot of 3s, especially deep ones, means Pitt will have to contend with long rebounds. Something they are a little inconsistent about doing. Taft and Gray are not particularly adept at moving out quickly to grab rebounds. If Troutman drifts too far out, it can be a risk because then Pitt’s best inside defender is out of position and risks giving up an easy lay-up or inside basket. A lot of pressure on the perimeter defense.

Villanova is tough at home. They are 10-1 — the loss last weekend to Syracuse. This team has been big on potential for a couple years, but now appears to be putting it together. They survived near death earlier in the season when their charter plane suffered instrument failure. Naturally, they all say that only brought them closer together.

Villanova needs this game to help solidify its resume for the NCAA Tournament. They have a big win against Kansas, but need to show a little more. In a rarity for ‘Nova they have some control over whether they make it.

Either way, the ball is in VillanovaÂ’s court. The Wildcats donÂ’t need to make a run in the Big East Tournament or have the rest of the conference tournaments go according to plan to earn an engraved invitation to the “Big Dance.”

“We control our own destiny,” point guard Mike Nardi said. “ItÂ’s a good feeling.”

It sure is, because the Wildcats have not been in this position in this millennium. And that makes it exciting, especially this week with Pittsburgh and Boston College coming to town.

Controlling your destiny is overrated. Generally that’s just code for, “we are still trying to make up ground for blowing some games earlier in the season.”

The Wildcats do not get much love from their local papers. There is no previewing the game. No hype. Nothing. I realize there are a bunch of colleges in Philly playing Div. 1 basketball, but only one is in the top-25; and only one has a big game today.

As far as the NCAA Tournament goes, Joe Bendel speculates that Pitt may be the best hope of the Big East to make a deep run.

Somewhat of a reversing of the field from P-G columnist Ron Cook. A couple weeks ago, ostensibly in the context of questioning the teams effort against WVU, Cook spent most of his column criticizing Krauser. Actually complaining that Krauser wasn’t able to hoist a wild shot as the half came to an end. This piece lauds Krauser for his toughness and willingness to take the last shot. Whatever.

There’s a piece relating to Pitt’s swimming teams’ successes and the hope to improve the facilities via the “Quest for Excellence” fundraising drive.

Another story regards former Pitt head coach (1975-1980), and present Portland Trailblazer assistant, Tim Grgurich. Grgurich was also the top assistant for Jerry Tarkanian at UNLV in the 80s. Turns out he turned down an opportunity to become head coach at Providence after Pitino left.

Grgurich went 69-70 at Pitt, but his team was improving each year. Despite him being from Pittsburgh and having gone to school at Pitt, the story gives a pretty good indication why he was fired.

So listen to Pete Newell, Hall of Fame coach, talk about Grgurich.

“I remember Tark telling me one time, ‘You hire Timmy and there’s certain things you’re going to have to accept. He won’t meet with press and he’s not going to meet with the alumni. And when he’s scouting, he wants to go out and scout by himself.’

“That’s Tim.”

That is a career assistant. He now lives in Las Vegas in the offseason. Seems a shame if Pitt couldn’t find a way to tap his knowledge.

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter